The Bologna in the Field of Social Sciences and Humanities: A Precondition for Successful University Education

Q4 Social Sciences Athens Journal of Education Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.30958/aje.10-4-8
Jelena Osmanović Zajić, Jelena Maksimović
{"title":"The Bologna in the Field of Social Sciences and Humanities: A Precondition for Successful University Education","authors":"Jelena Osmanović Zajić, Jelena Maksimović","doi":"10.30958/aje.10-4-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Bologna Process represents the most significant extensive reform of higher education in Europe. The particular aspects of the Bologna Process still incite critical evaluations as regards the successfulness of its implementation. The theoretical part of the paper analyzes the fundamental principles defined in the Bologna Declaration, requirements and critical views of the Bologna Process, as well as the relevant research conducted on this issue used for the comparative analysis. The introduction of the Bologna Process into the Serbian university education has initiated numerous changes, the increase of the student mobility being the most striking one. The empirical part of the paper focuses on the study of the following problem: the manner in which students of social sciences and humanities perceive the Bologna Process fifteen years after its implementation into the Serbian university education. Consequently, the subject matter of the research is the observation and description of students’ attitudes to this phenomenon with the purpose of acquiring relevant information “firsthand”. The achievable objective of the presented research reviews the context and condition of the Bologna Process during 2019/2020 academic year and its feasible improvements, which can contribute to comparative study of similar researches in the time of the pandemics. The specific research tasks include the study of the Bologna requirements, attitudes to the Bologna Process, benefits and restrictions of this reform, and particularly the attempt to suggest the improvement of the Bologna Process realization from the perspective of students of social sciences and humanities. The research sample consisted of the Bachelor students of social sciences and humanities from the Faculty of Philosophy in Niš (N=150). The survey technique and the scaling technique with a rating scale questionnaire were used (BOL-JM-JOZ). The questionnaire had five closed-ended questions, while the Likert scale was comprised of 23 items. The test of the instrument consistency proved its reliability. The obtained results were shown by the chi square test, which proved a statistically significant difference in the respondents’ answers as regards the year of study, p<0.05. The main factors were extracted from the assessment scale by the application of the factor analysis. These factors examined the students’ perceptions of the Bologna Process, comparing the answers provided by the students of the first, second, third and fourth year of study of social sciences and humanities, p<0.05. Keywords: Bologna, present state of affairs, perspectives, perceptions, students","PeriodicalId":36453,"journal":{"name":"Athens Journal of Education","volume":"227 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athens Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-4-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Bologna Process represents the most significant extensive reform of higher education in Europe. The particular aspects of the Bologna Process still incite critical evaluations as regards the successfulness of its implementation. The theoretical part of the paper analyzes the fundamental principles defined in the Bologna Declaration, requirements and critical views of the Bologna Process, as well as the relevant research conducted on this issue used for the comparative analysis. The introduction of the Bologna Process into the Serbian university education has initiated numerous changes, the increase of the student mobility being the most striking one. The empirical part of the paper focuses on the study of the following problem: the manner in which students of social sciences and humanities perceive the Bologna Process fifteen years after its implementation into the Serbian university education. Consequently, the subject matter of the research is the observation and description of students’ attitudes to this phenomenon with the purpose of acquiring relevant information “firsthand”. The achievable objective of the presented research reviews the context and condition of the Bologna Process during 2019/2020 academic year and its feasible improvements, which can contribute to comparative study of similar researches in the time of the pandemics. The specific research tasks include the study of the Bologna requirements, attitudes to the Bologna Process, benefits and restrictions of this reform, and particularly the attempt to suggest the improvement of the Bologna Process realization from the perspective of students of social sciences and humanities. The research sample consisted of the Bachelor students of social sciences and humanities from the Faculty of Philosophy in Niš (N=150). The survey technique and the scaling technique with a rating scale questionnaire were used (BOL-JM-JOZ). The questionnaire had five closed-ended questions, while the Likert scale was comprised of 23 items. The test of the instrument consistency proved its reliability. The obtained results were shown by the chi square test, which proved a statistically significant difference in the respondents’ answers as regards the year of study, p<0.05. The main factors were extracted from the assessment scale by the application of the factor analysis. These factors examined the students’ perceptions of the Bologna Process, comparing the answers provided by the students of the first, second, third and fourth year of study of social sciences and humanities, p<0.05. Keywords: Bologna, present state of affairs, perspectives, perceptions, students
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
博洛尼亚在社会科学和人文领域:成功的大学教育的先决条件
博洛尼亚进程代表了欧洲最重要的高等教育改革。博洛尼亚进程的具体方面仍然引起对其执行是否成功的批评性评价。本文的理论部分分析了博洛尼亚宣言确定的基本原则,博洛尼亚进程的要求和批判观点,以及对这一问题所进行的相关研究进行了对比分析。在塞尔维亚大学教育中引入博洛尼亚进程已经引发了许多变化,其中最引人注目的是学生流动性的增加。本文的实证部分着重于以下问题的研究:在博洛尼亚进程进入塞尔维亚大学教育15年后,社会科学和人文科学学生如何看待博洛尼亚进程。因此,本研究的主题是观察和描述学生对这一现象的态度,目的是“第一手”获取相关信息。本研究的可实现目标审查了2019/2020学年博洛尼亚进程的背景和条件及其可行的改进措施,有助于对大流行病时期的类似研究进行比较研究。具体的研究任务包括研究博洛尼亚要求,对博洛尼亚进程的态度,这一改革的好处和限制,特别是试图从社会科学和人文科学学生的角度提出改进博洛尼亚进程实现的建议。研究样本为尼乌斯哲学学院社会科学和人文学科的本科生(N=150)。采用问卷调查法和量表法(BOL-JM-JOZ)。问卷有5个封闭式问题,而李克特量表由23个项目组成。仪器一致性测试证明了其可靠性。所得结果经卡方检验,被调查者的回答在学习年限上有统计学差异,p<0.05。应用因子分析法从评价量表中提取主要因子。这些因素考察了学生对博洛尼亚进程的看法,比较了社会科学和人文学科一、二、三、四年级学生提供的答案,p<0.05。关键词:博洛尼亚,现状,观点,观念,学生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Athens Journal of Education
Athens Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fostering Students' Active Participation in Higher Education: The Role of Teacher-student Rapport Metacognitive Strategies and Tendency to be Open to Learning: A Predictive Study Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its Potential Impact on the Future of Higher Education COVID-19 Global Pandemic Upheaval: CTE Teachers Response in the United States Supporting Distributed Learning through Immersive Learning Environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1