{"title":"Influence of pesticide exposure on farmers’ cognition: A systematic review","authors":"Suelen Finhler, Gabriela Putton Marchesan, Cristian Ferreira Corona, Andressa Talita Nunes, Karen Cristine Silva De Oliveira, Amanda Tapia de Moraes, Letiére Cabreira Soares, Fernanda Oliveira Lima, Camila Dalmolin, Dalila Moter Benvegnú","doi":"10.25259/jnrp_58_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Pesticide application has become necessary to increase crop productivity and reduce losses. However, the use of these products can produce toxic effects. Farmers are individuals occupationally exposed to pesticides, thus subject to associated diseases as well as cognitive impairment. However, this relation is not well established in the literature, requiring further investigation. To assess the potential association between farmers’ pesticide exposure and cognitive impairment, we followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, considering participants, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and study strategies. Materials and Methods: This study included articles published between 2000 and 2021 on the Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and PubMed databases, retrieved by the terms “ pesticides and cognition ” and “ pesticides and memory .” Results: In total, ten studies fit the established criteria and were included in the sample. All had farmers occupationally exposed to pesticides in their sample and only one study dispensed with a control group. Of the neurobehavioral tests, four studies used mini-mental state examination, six neurobehavioral core test batteries (tests recognized in the area), and the remaining, other tests. We observed that 90% of articles found an association between cognitive impairment and pesticide exposure. Overall, five studies measured the activity of cholinesterases in their sample, of which three found significant differences between groups, confirming intoxication in those exposed. Conclusion: Despite the limited number of trials, we found scientific evidence to support the existence of adverse effects of pesticides on farmers’ cognition. We recommend that future studies research similar projects, expanding knowledge on the subject.","PeriodicalId":16443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jnrp_58_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Pesticide application has become necessary to increase crop productivity and reduce losses. However, the use of these products can produce toxic effects. Farmers are individuals occupationally exposed to pesticides, thus subject to associated diseases as well as cognitive impairment. However, this relation is not well established in the literature, requiring further investigation. To assess the potential association between farmers’ pesticide exposure and cognitive impairment, we followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, considering participants, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and study strategies. Materials and Methods: This study included articles published between 2000 and 2021 on the Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and PubMed databases, retrieved by the terms “ pesticides and cognition ” and “ pesticides and memory .” Results: In total, ten studies fit the established criteria and were included in the sample. All had farmers occupationally exposed to pesticides in their sample and only one study dispensed with a control group. Of the neurobehavioral tests, four studies used mini-mental state examination, six neurobehavioral core test batteries (tests recognized in the area), and the remaining, other tests. We observed that 90% of articles found an association between cognitive impairment and pesticide exposure. Overall, five studies measured the activity of cholinesterases in their sample, of which three found significant differences between groups, confirming intoxication in those exposed. Conclusion: Despite the limited number of trials, we found scientific evidence to support the existence of adverse effects of pesticides on farmers’ cognition. We recommend that future studies research similar projects, expanding knowledge on the subject.
目的:农药的施用已成为提高作物生产力和减少损失的必要条件。然而,使用这些产品会产生毒性作用。农民是职业上接触农药的个体,因此易患相关疾病和认知障碍。然而,这种关系在文献中并没有很好地建立,需要进一步的研究。为了评估农民农药暴露与认知障碍之间的潜在关联,我们遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,考虑了参与者、干预措施、比较物、结果和研究策略。材料与方法:本研究纳入了2000年至2021年间发表在Scopus、Web of Science、ScienceDirect和PubMed数据库上的论文,检索词为“农药与认知”和“农药与记忆”。结果:总共有10篇研究符合所建立的标准并被纳入样本。所有研究的样本中都有农民在职业上接触杀虫剂,只有一项研究没有对照组。在神经行为测试中,有四项研究使用了小型精神状态测试,六项研究使用了神经行为核心测试(该领域公认的测试),其余的研究使用了其他测试。我们观察到90%的文章发现认知障碍与农药接触之间存在关联。总的来说,有五项研究测量了样本中胆碱酯酶的活性,其中三项发现了组间的显著差异,证实了暴露者的中毒。结论:尽管试验数量有限,但我们发现了支持农药对农民认知存在不良影响的科学证据。我们建议未来的研究研究类似的项目,扩大知识的主题。