Symptomatic women experience long waits for endometrial cancer diagnosis and treatment in Brazil

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of gynaecological oncology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22514/ejgo.2023.063
{"title":"Symptomatic women experience long waits for endometrial cancer diagnosis and treatment in Brazil","authors":"","doi":"10.22514/ejgo.2023.063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to assess the elapsed time for symptomatic women with endometrial carcinoma to achieve diagnosis and treatment and its impact on staging and survival. A cohort study was carried out with 430 women divided into in two groups: “Type I” (n = 289, endometrioid carcinoma grade 1 or 2); “Type II” (n = 141, nonendometrioid, endometrioid carcinoma grade 3, or carcinosarcoma). Clinical information, diagnostic methods, histology, staging, and time elapsed between symptoms-diagnosis-treatment were considered. Descriptive, survival, and regression analyses were performed. The symptom-to-diagnosis interval was 284 and 249 days in Types I and II (p = 0.014), with only 30% getting a diagnosis within 90 days. The diagnosis-to-treatment interval was shorter for Type II (100 vs. 123 days for Type I; p = 0.001). Only 12.5% of Type I and 22.7% of Type II started treatment within 60 days after diagnosis. There was no association between symptom-to-diagnosis interval and staging (p = 0.377). The symptom-to-treatment interval did not change the overall survival for Type I and had a paradoxical effect for Type II, with greater overall survival associated with a longer elapsed time (p = 0.003). Symptomatic Brazilian women with endometrial carcinomas showed very long wait times for diagnosis and treatment, and less than 23% started treatment within the regulatory period of 60 days. This critical situation does not exhibit any clear effect on cancer staging or overall survival, possibly counterbalanced by the faster care of patients with a poor prognosis, such as those with Type II endometrial carcinomas.","PeriodicalId":11903,"journal":{"name":"European journal of gynaecological oncology","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of gynaecological oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/ejgo.2023.063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the elapsed time for symptomatic women with endometrial carcinoma to achieve diagnosis and treatment and its impact on staging and survival. A cohort study was carried out with 430 women divided into in two groups: “Type I” (n = 289, endometrioid carcinoma grade 1 or 2); “Type II” (n = 141, nonendometrioid, endometrioid carcinoma grade 3, or carcinosarcoma). Clinical information, diagnostic methods, histology, staging, and time elapsed between symptoms-diagnosis-treatment were considered. Descriptive, survival, and regression analyses were performed. The symptom-to-diagnosis interval was 284 and 249 days in Types I and II (p = 0.014), with only 30% getting a diagnosis within 90 days. The diagnosis-to-treatment interval was shorter for Type II (100 vs. 123 days for Type I; p = 0.001). Only 12.5% of Type I and 22.7% of Type II started treatment within 60 days after diagnosis. There was no association between symptom-to-diagnosis interval and staging (p = 0.377). The symptom-to-treatment interval did not change the overall survival for Type I and had a paradoxical effect for Type II, with greater overall survival associated with a longer elapsed time (p = 0.003). Symptomatic Brazilian women with endometrial carcinomas showed very long wait times for diagnosis and treatment, and less than 23% started treatment within the regulatory period of 60 days. This critical situation does not exhibit any clear effect on cancer staging or overall survival, possibly counterbalanced by the faster care of patients with a poor prognosis, such as those with Type II endometrial carcinomas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在巴西,有症状的妇女在子宫内膜癌的诊断和治疗方面经历了漫长的等待
本研究的目的是评估有症状的子宫内膜癌妇女获得诊断和治疗的时间及其对分期和生存的影响。一项队列研究将430名女性分为两组:“I型”(289名,1级或2级子宫内膜样癌);“II型”(141名,非子宫内膜样癌、3级子宫内膜样癌或癌肉瘤)。临床信息、诊断方法、组织学、分期和症状-诊断-治疗之间的时间间隔被考虑在内。进行描述性分析、生存分析和回归分析。I型和II型患者从症状到诊断的时间间隔分别为284天和249天(p = 0.014),只有30%的患者在90天内得到诊断。II型从诊断到治疗的间隔时间较短(100天vs. 123天,p = 0.001)。只有12.5%的I型和22.7%的II型患者在诊断后60天内开始治疗。从症状到诊断的时间间隔与分期无相关性(p = 0.377)。症状到治疗的时间间隔并没有改变I型患者的总生存期,但对II型患者却有矛盾的影响,总生存期越长,时间越长(p = 0.003)。有症状的巴西子宫内膜癌妇女的诊断和治疗等待时间很长,不到23%的人在规定的60天内开始治疗。这种危急情况对癌症分期或总生存期没有明显的影响,可能通过对预后较差的患者(如II型子宫内膜癌患者)的更快护理来抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJGO is dedicated to publishing editorial articles in the Distinguished Expert Series and original research papers, case reports, letters to the Editor, book reviews, and newsletters. The Journal was founded in 1980 the second gynaecologic oncology hyperspecialization Journal in the world. Its aim is the diffusion of scientific, clinical and practical progress, and knowledge in female neoplastic diseases in an interdisciplinary approach among gynaecologists, oncologists, radiotherapists, surgeons, chemotherapists, pathologists, epidemiologists, and so on.
期刊最新文献
Timing and duration of bevacizumab treatment and survival in patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer: a multi-institution study. Vulvar cancer in young woman—case report Identification of an immune-related metabolic gene signature to predict possible prognosis in endometrial cancer and reveals immune landscape feature Evaluation of colposcopy and LEEP results performed in gynecology and gynecological oncology surgery services The infrequent large pelvi-perineal tumors as a surgical dilemma: en bloc resection and long-term results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1