ASSESSMENT OF METERED DOSE INHALER TECHNIQUE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE

Dr maliha Batool, Dr savida ilyas dar DAR, DR RIZWAN AHMAD, Dr hareema saeed khan Khan, DR SHABIH HAIDER HAIDER, Dr aroosa Farid
{"title":"ASSESSMENT OF METERED DOSE INHALER TECHNIQUE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE","authors":"Dr maliha Batool, Dr savida ilyas dar DAR, DR RIZWAN AHMAD, Dr hareema saeed khan Khan, DR SHABIH HAIDER HAIDER, Dr aroosa Farid","doi":"10.35787/jimdc.v12i3.950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background
 Appropriate selection and correct use of inhalation devices is an integral component in the management of asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease (COLD). It is well known that no one device suits all patients. Metered Dose Inhalers (MDIs) and Soft Mist Inhalers (SMIs) are widely used even if benefits to patients are strictly related to their usability. Our aim of the study was to assess the frequency of patients with chronic obstructive lung diseases having improper metered dose inhaler technique.
 Methodology
 It was a cross-sectional study done at outpatient Department of Medical Department, Federal Government Polyclinic Hospital, Islamabad over a period of 3.All Patients with COLD presenting in OPD were assessed as having either a correct (performed ALL 6 steps correctly) or incorrect (not performed all steps correctly) inhaler technique, data being recorded on proforma.
 RESULTS
 A total of 250 patients were included in the study ranged between 14-70 years with mean age of patients 46.5±15.7 years. Total of 6 steps of inhalation technique was observed. Mean steps was 3.8±1.4. Incorrect inhaler technique (≤5 steps) was adopted by 220 patients (88%) and correct technique (6 steps) adopted by only 30 patients (12%). Stratification for age, gender, duration of COLD, education, marital status, occupation and BMI was also carried out.
 CONCLUSION
 Our study demonstrates that incorrect technique during inhalation is common among our patients with COLD hence it emphasizes an essential role of health professionals in regular evaluation of their patients and caregivers to ensure correct application of inhalation devices.
 
 KEY WORDS
 Metered dose inhalers (MDI), Chronic obstructive lung disease (COLD), Correct technique
","PeriodicalId":33701,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamabad Medical and Dental College","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamabad Medical and Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35787/jimdc.v12i3.950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Appropriate selection and correct use of inhalation devices is an integral component in the management of asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease (COLD). It is well known that no one device suits all patients. Metered Dose Inhalers (MDIs) and Soft Mist Inhalers (SMIs) are widely used even if benefits to patients are strictly related to their usability. Our aim of the study was to assess the frequency of patients with chronic obstructive lung diseases having improper metered dose inhaler technique. Methodology It was a cross-sectional study done at outpatient Department of Medical Department, Federal Government Polyclinic Hospital, Islamabad over a period of 3.All Patients with COLD presenting in OPD were assessed as having either a correct (performed ALL 6 steps correctly) or incorrect (not performed all steps correctly) inhaler technique, data being recorded on proforma. RESULTS A total of 250 patients were included in the study ranged between 14-70 years with mean age of patients 46.5±15.7 years. Total of 6 steps of inhalation technique was observed. Mean steps was 3.8±1.4. Incorrect inhaler technique (≤5 steps) was adopted by 220 patients (88%) and correct technique (6 steps) adopted by only 30 patients (12%). Stratification for age, gender, duration of COLD, education, marital status, occupation and BMI was also carried out. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates that incorrect technique during inhalation is common among our patients with COLD hence it emphasizes an essential role of health professionals in regular evaluation of their patients and caregivers to ensure correct application of inhalation devices. KEY WORDS Metered dose inhalers (MDI), Chronic obstructive lung disease (COLD), Correct technique
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者计量吸入器技术的评估
背景# x0D;适当选择和正确使用吸入装置是哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COLD)管理的一个组成部分。众所周知,没有一种设备适合所有的病人。计量吸入器(mdi)和软雾吸入器(SMIs)被广泛使用,即使对患者的益处与它们的可用性严格相关。我们的研究目的是评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用不正确的计量吸入器技术的频率。方法# x0D;这是一项横断面研究,在伊斯兰堡联邦政府综合医院内科门诊部进行,为期3年。所有在门诊就诊的感冒患者被评估为吸入器技术正确(正确执行所有6个步骤)或不正确(未正确执行所有步骤),数据记录在形式表上。 结果# x0D;研究共纳入250例患者,年龄在14-70岁之间,平均年龄46.5±15.7岁。观察吸入技术共6个步骤。平均步数为3.8±1.4。220例(88%)患者采用不正确的吸入器技术(≤5步),只有30例(12%)患者采用正确的吸入器技术(6步)。对年龄、性别、感冒持续时间、教育程度、婚姻状况、职业和BMI进行分层。 结论# x0D;我们的研究表明,在吸入过程中不正确的技术在感冒患者中很常见,因此强调了卫生专业人员在定期评估患者和护理人员以确保正确使用吸入装置方面的重要作用。 & # x0D;关键字# x0D;计量吸入器(MDI),慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COLD),正确技术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does Laparoscopic Lens Contamination Effect Operative Time? A study on the Frequency and Duration of Lens Contamination and Commonly Used Measures to Maintain Clear Vision Analysis of Therapeutic Phlebotomy in Patients of Polycythemia: A Single Center Study Potential of Gut Microbiome in mosquitoes for Dengue Vector Control Prolapsed Fibroid in Pregnancy Leiomyoma of the Trachea: A Rare Tracheal Tumor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1