Quantitative and qualitative assessment of enamel surface following two composite removal methods after bracket debonding

Sunegha Kundal, PawanjitSingh Walia, Tulika Shokeen, Anubhav Bansal, DushyantSingh Janmeda
{"title":"Quantitative and qualitative assessment of enamel surface following two composite removal methods after bracket debonding","authors":"Sunegha Kundal, PawanjitSingh Walia, Tulika Shokeen, Anubhav Bansal, DushyantSingh Janmeda","doi":"10.4103/ijds.ijds_1_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To evaluate and compare morphology and roughness of the enamel surface after debonding and polishing by two methods: aluminum oxide disks (Shofu, Super-Snap) and 30-fluted tungsten carbide bur (Strauss and Co.) using a surface roughness tester and a scanning electron microscope (SEM), respectively. Subjects and Methods: For this study, we selected 15 orthodontic patients with bonded metal brackets. After the completion of fixed orthodontic treatment, metal brackets for the maxillary central incisors were removed with a debonding plier. For every patient, teeth were chosen on a random basis to be finished and polished with Super-Snap aluminum oxide disks on one side (n = 15) and with 30-fluted tungsten carbide bur (n = 15) on the other side. Epoxy resin was used to obtain the replicas of maxillary anterior teeth (before and after tooth polishing). SEM analysis was done for five samples from each group. Results: The average roughness after resin removal in the 30-fluted tungsten carbide bur group (0.328 mm ± 0.099) was found to be significantly higher when compared to the Super-Snap aluminum oxide disks (0.299 mm ± 0.109). Conclusions: The Super-Snap aluminum oxide disks resulted in superior finishing and polishing than 30-fluted tungsten carbide bur.","PeriodicalId":56210,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijds.ijds_1_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate and compare morphology and roughness of the enamel surface after debonding and polishing by two methods: aluminum oxide disks (Shofu, Super-Snap) and 30-fluted tungsten carbide bur (Strauss and Co.) using a surface roughness tester and a scanning electron microscope (SEM), respectively. Subjects and Methods: For this study, we selected 15 orthodontic patients with bonded metal brackets. After the completion of fixed orthodontic treatment, metal brackets for the maxillary central incisors were removed with a debonding plier. For every patient, teeth were chosen on a random basis to be finished and polished with Super-Snap aluminum oxide disks on one side (n = 15) and with 30-fluted tungsten carbide bur (n = 15) on the other side. Epoxy resin was used to obtain the replicas of maxillary anterior teeth (before and after tooth polishing). SEM analysis was done for five samples from each group. Results: The average roughness after resin removal in the 30-fluted tungsten carbide bur group (0.328 mm ± 0.099) was found to be significantly higher when compared to the Super-Snap aluminum oxide disks (0.299 mm ± 0.109). Conclusions: The Super-Snap aluminum oxide disks resulted in superior finishing and polishing than 30-fluted tungsten carbide bur.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
托槽脱粘后两种复合去除方法对牙釉质表面的定量和定性评价
目的:利用表面粗糙度测试仪和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分别对氧化铝盘(Shofu, Super-Snap)和30槽碳化钨钎(Strauss and Co.)两种方法脱粘和抛光后的牙釉质表面形貌和粗糙度进行评价和比较。对象和方法:本研究选择了15例使用粘结金属托槽的正畸患者。固定正畸治疗完成后,用脱粘钳将上颌中切牙金属托架取出。随机选择每位患者的牙齿,在一侧(n = 15)使用Super-Snap氧化铝盘完成和抛光,另一侧(n = 15)使用30槽碳化钨钎头完成和抛光。采用环氧树脂获得上颌前牙抛光前后的复制品。每组5个样品进行扫描电镜分析。结果:30槽碳化钨焊盘去除树脂后的平均粗糙度(0.328 mm±0.099)明显高于Super-Snap氧化铝焊盘(0.299 mm±0.109)。结论:Super-Snap氧化铝盘的抛光效果优于30槽碳化钨钎头。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
A case series of Mediterranean spotted fever and murine typhus with neurological manifestations. Clinical Study of Analgesic and Anti-inflammatory Properties of Cannabis Derivatives in Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Pathology: Preliminary Study Seasonal prevalence of dengue vector mosquito Aedes aegypti Linn in Jaipur city, Rajasthan, India. Recombinant protein immunoblots for differential diagnosis of tick-borne relapsing fever and Lyme disease. Larvicidal property and active compound profiling of Annona squamosa leaf extracts against two species of diptera, Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1