PROMETHEUS: Long-Term Exacerbation and Mortality Benefits of Implementing Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in the US COPD Population

Criner Gerard, Fernando Martinez, Hitesh Gandhi, Bruce Pyenson, Norbert Feigler, Matthew Emery, Umang Gupta, Muthiah Vaduganathan
{"title":"PROMETHEUS: Long-Term Exacerbation and Mortality Benefits of Implementing Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in the US COPD Population","authors":"Criner Gerard, Fernando Martinez, Hitesh Gandhi, Bruce Pyenson, Norbert Feigler, Matthew Emery, Umang Gupta, Muthiah Vaduganathan","doi":"10.36469/jheor.2023.55635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The US population includes 24 million to 29 million people with diagnosed and undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) in reducing COPD exacerbations. Long-term population implications of SITT use have not been quantified. Objectives: This simulation-based projection aimed to estimate the potential impact of widespread SITT use on the US COPD population. Methods: Exacerbation and all-cause mortality reductions reported in the Efficacy and Safety of Triple Therapy in Obstructive Lung Disease trial (ETHOS; NCT02465567) were used to project clinical outcomes in US patients meeting ETHOS trial eligibility criteria (ETHOS-Eligible) and patients meeting a practical definition of SITT eligibility (Expanded ETHOS-Eligible). The US COPD population was modeled with 1000 simulations of patient progression over 10 years. Agent characteristics were based on literature and claims analysis of the 2016-2018 Medicare 100% fee-for-service and IBM MarketScan® databases. Agent annual characteristics reflected incident cases, changes in COPD severity, treatment, mortality, and exacerbations under status quo treatment patterns and scenarios for the adoption of SITT. The scenarios assumed the reduced exacerbation and mortality rates associated with SITT according to ETHOS trial outcomes mean values. Results: Higher than current SITT adoption over 10 years would be expected to substantially reduce COPD exacerbation-associated hospitalizations by 2 million. Applying mean improvements reported in ETHOS for SITT would extend average patient life expectancy 2.2 years for ETHOS-Eligible patients and 1.7 years for Expanded ETHOS-Eligible patients. The number needed to treat to extend the average patient life by 1 year was 8 for the ETHOS-Eligible population and 10 for the Expanded ETHOS-Eligible population. Discussion: Widespread SITT adoption may be impeded by competitive pressures from generic treatments and nonadherence, and efficacy observed in clinical trials may not occur in real-world populations. Conclusions: Assuming ETHOS treatment effects and adherence translate to clinical practice, higher than current use of SITT can substantially reduce COPD exacerbations and hospitalizations and extend survival. These results should be viewed cautiously, because the improved outcomes for SITT in the ETHOS final retrieved vital statistics data were not statistically significant for all comparator therapy groups.","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2023.55635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The US population includes 24 million to 29 million people with diagnosed and undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) in reducing COPD exacerbations. Long-term population implications of SITT use have not been quantified. Objectives: This simulation-based projection aimed to estimate the potential impact of widespread SITT use on the US COPD population. Methods: Exacerbation and all-cause mortality reductions reported in the Efficacy and Safety of Triple Therapy in Obstructive Lung Disease trial (ETHOS; NCT02465567) were used to project clinical outcomes in US patients meeting ETHOS trial eligibility criteria (ETHOS-Eligible) and patients meeting a practical definition of SITT eligibility (Expanded ETHOS-Eligible). The US COPD population was modeled with 1000 simulations of patient progression over 10 years. Agent characteristics were based on literature and claims analysis of the 2016-2018 Medicare 100% fee-for-service and IBM MarketScan® databases. Agent annual characteristics reflected incident cases, changes in COPD severity, treatment, mortality, and exacerbations under status quo treatment patterns and scenarios for the adoption of SITT. The scenarios assumed the reduced exacerbation and mortality rates associated with SITT according to ETHOS trial outcomes mean values. Results: Higher than current SITT adoption over 10 years would be expected to substantially reduce COPD exacerbation-associated hospitalizations by 2 million. Applying mean improvements reported in ETHOS for SITT would extend average patient life expectancy 2.2 years for ETHOS-Eligible patients and 1.7 years for Expanded ETHOS-Eligible patients. The number needed to treat to extend the average patient life by 1 year was 8 for the ETHOS-Eligible population and 10 for the Expanded ETHOS-Eligible population. Discussion: Widespread SITT adoption may be impeded by competitive pressures from generic treatments and nonadherence, and efficacy observed in clinical trials may not occur in real-world populations. Conclusions: Assuming ETHOS treatment effects and adherence translate to clinical practice, higher than current use of SITT can substantially reduce COPD exacerbations and hospitalizations and extend survival. These results should be viewed cautiously, because the improved outcomes for SITT in the ETHOS final retrieved vital statistics data were not statistically significant for all comparator therapy groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PROMETHEUS:在美国COPD人群中实施单吸入器三联治疗的长期恶化和死亡率益处
背景:美国人口包括2400万至2900万确诊和未确诊的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者。研究已经证明了单吸入器三联疗法(SITT)在减少COPD恶化方面的安全性和有效性。使用SITT对人口的长期影响尚未量化。目的:这项基于模拟的预测旨在评估SITT广泛使用对美国COPD人群的潜在影响。方法:阻塞性肺疾病三联疗法疗效和安全性试验(ETHOS;NCT02465567)用于预测符合ETHOS试验资格标准(ETHOS- eligible)和符合SITT资格实际定义(扩展ETHOS- eligible)的美国患者的临床结果。美国慢性阻塞性肺病人群在10年内进行了1000次患者进展模拟。代理人特征基于2016-2018年医疗保险100%按服务收费和IBM MarketScan®数据库的文献和索赔分析。代理人的年度特征反映了在现状治疗模式和采用SITT的情况下的发病率、COPD严重程度、治疗、死亡率和恶化的变化。根据ETHOS试验结果的平均值,假设与SITT相关的恶化和死亡率降低。结果:高于目前SITT的采用率超过10年,预计将大大减少与COPD恶化相关的住院人数200万。应用ETHOS报告的SITT平均改善将使符合ETHOS条件的患者的平均预期寿命延长2.2年,扩展符合ETHOS条件的患者的平均预期寿命延长1.7年。在符合ethos条件的人群中,需要治疗的患者平均寿命延长1年的人数为8人,而在扩大的符合ethos条件的人群中,需要治疗的人数为10人。讨论:SITT的广泛采用可能受到仿制治疗和不依从性的竞争压力的阻碍,并且在临床试验中观察到的疗效可能不会出现在现实人群中。结论:假设ETHOS治疗效果和依从性转化为临床实践,高于目前SITT的使用可以显著减少COPD恶化和住院,延长生存期。这些结果应该谨慎看待,因为在ETHOS最终检索的生命统计数据中,SITT的改善结果在所有比较治疗组中都没有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ia: A Retrospective Claims Analysis of Complications, Resource Utilization, and Cost of Care. Exploring Quality of Life in Adults Living With Late-onset Pompe Disease: A Combined Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Patient Perceptions from Australia, France, Italy, and the Netherlands. Cost-Utility Analysis of Add-on Cannabidiol vs Usual Care Alone for the Treatment of Seizures in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome or Dravet Syndrome in the Netherlands. The Effects of Adverse Events and Associated Costs on Value-Based Care for Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Could the Inflation Reduction Act Maximum Fair Price Hurt Patients?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1