Wearing Your Worth at Work: The Consequences of Employees’ Daily Clothing Choices

IF 9.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Academy of Management Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.5465/amj.2021.1358
Joseph K. Kim, Brian C. Holtz, Ryan M. Vogel
{"title":"Wearing Your Worth at Work: The Consequences of Employees’ Daily Clothing Choices","authors":"Joseph K. Kim, Brian C. Holtz, Ryan M. Vogel","doi":"10.5465/amj.2021.1358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do the clothes worn to work impact employees’ thoughts and behaviors? Despite the universal necessity of wearing clothes and the fact that employees make decisions about this daily, organizational scholars have not yet addressed this question. We integrated sociometer and enclothed cognition theories to propose that aspects of clothing—their aesthetics, conformity, and uniqueness—hold symbolic meanings that have implications for employees’ state self-esteem and subsequent task and relational behaviors (i.e., goal progress, social avoidance). We first provide evidence for the nature of the symbolic meanings associated with these three dimensions of work clothing in a set of within-person experimental studies. Then, the results of a 10-day field study of employees from four organizations generally supported our predictions, showing that daily clothing aesthetics and uniqueness had effects on state self-esteem and downstream behavioral consequences. The effects of daily clothing conformity emerged under the condition of greater interaction frequency with others in the workplace. Our manuscript contributes to both major theories from which we draw and further offers theoretical and practical contributions to the literature on organizational clothing.","PeriodicalId":6975,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Journal","volume":"299 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2021.1358","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Do the clothes worn to work impact employees’ thoughts and behaviors? Despite the universal necessity of wearing clothes and the fact that employees make decisions about this daily, organizational scholars have not yet addressed this question. We integrated sociometer and enclothed cognition theories to propose that aspects of clothing—their aesthetics, conformity, and uniqueness—hold symbolic meanings that have implications for employees’ state self-esteem and subsequent task and relational behaviors (i.e., goal progress, social avoidance). We first provide evidence for the nature of the symbolic meanings associated with these three dimensions of work clothing in a set of within-person experimental studies. Then, the results of a 10-day field study of employees from four organizations generally supported our predictions, showing that daily clothing aesthetics and uniqueness had effects on state self-esteem and downstream behavioral consequences. The effects of daily clothing conformity emerged under the condition of greater interaction frequency with others in the workplace. Our manuscript contributes to both major theories from which we draw and further offers theoretical and practical contributions to the literature on organizational clothing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《在工作中彰显你的价值:员工日常着装选择的后果》
上班穿的衣服会影响员工的思想和行为吗?尽管穿衣服是普遍的需要,而且员工每天都要做决定,但组织学者还没有解决这个问题。我们整合了社会测量和服装认知理论,提出服装的各个方面——美学、一致性和独特性——具有象征意义,对员工的状态自尊和随后的任务和关系行为(即目标进展、社会回避)有影响。我们首先在一组内部实验研究中提供了与工作服这三个维度相关的象征意义的性质的证据。然后,对来自四个组织的员工进行了为期10天的实地研究,结果总体上支持了我们的预测,表明日常服装美学和独特性对状态自尊和下游行为后果有影响。日常着装一致性的影响出现在工作场所与他人互动频率更高的情况下。我们的手稿有助于我们从中吸取的两个主要理论,并进一步为组织服装的文献提供理论和实践贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The mission of the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) is to disseminate empirical research that rigorously tests, extends, or constructs management theory while enhancing management practice. The journal welcomes diverse empirical methods, including qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, meta-analytic, and mixed methods. For publication in AMJ, research must exhibit robust empirical and theoretical contributions, with manuscripts emphasizing the practical relevance of these contributions to management practice. Authors are encouraged to craft original, insightful, interesting, and theoretically bold research that makes a substantial "value-added" contribution to the field's comprehension of a given issue or topic.
期刊最新文献
It Is Not the Whole Story: Toward a Broader Understanding of Entrepreneurial Ventures’ Symbolic Differentiation A Window Into Coworkers’ Worlds: The Relational Outcomes of Learning Vivid, Unintentional, and Nonwork-Related Information About Coworkers The AMJ Management Research Canvas: A Tool for Conducting and Reporting Empirical Research Putting Distant Futures into Action: How Actors Sustain a Course of Action toward Distant-Future Goals through Path Enactment CEO Political Partisanship and Corporate Misconduct
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1