Identifying nature-positive futures in new cities: an application of the Urban Nature Futures Framework

IF 5.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainability Science Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1007/s11625-023-01411-3
Shaikh Fairul Edros Ahmad Shaikh, Perrine Hamel
{"title":"Identifying nature-positive futures in new cities: an application of the Urban Nature Futures Framework","authors":"Shaikh Fairul Edros Ahmad Shaikh, Perrine Hamel","doi":"10.1007/s11625-023-01411-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract With the increasing loss of biodiversity due to urbanization, it is essential to examine and re-imagine the place of nature in cities. The opportunity to redesign positive relationships between cities and nature is particularly apparent in the development of new cities—rapidly developing areas observed in many Asian and African countries. As these new cities are built on a perceived tabula rasa, there is a potential to design positive nature futures. This study, therefore, aims to understand how nature is incorporated into existing plans for new cities and identify pro-nature perspectives envisioned within these plans. We use the Urban Nature Futures Framework (UNFF) to conduct a content analysis on the masterplans of new city and town developments within the Jakarta Metropolitan Area (JMA). The UNFF promotes the creation of multiple positive visions of nature in cities by considering three broad nature perspectives: Nature for Nature, Nature for Society, and Nature as Culture, as well as emphasizing equity in these visions. Our findings show that the Nature for Society perspective tends to dominate the design of new cities in the JMA, closely followed by the Nature for Nature perspective embodied by pollution control measures. New cities also emphasise the Nature as Culture perspective through nature stewardship programmes. Based on these results, we exemplify how the UNFF can be used to further integrate nature elements in new cities’ masterplans. We conclude with a discussion of the strengths and limitations of the framework at each stage of the new city development process.","PeriodicalId":49457,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01411-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract With the increasing loss of biodiversity due to urbanization, it is essential to examine and re-imagine the place of nature in cities. The opportunity to redesign positive relationships between cities and nature is particularly apparent in the development of new cities—rapidly developing areas observed in many Asian and African countries. As these new cities are built on a perceived tabula rasa, there is a potential to design positive nature futures. This study, therefore, aims to understand how nature is incorporated into existing plans for new cities and identify pro-nature perspectives envisioned within these plans. We use the Urban Nature Futures Framework (UNFF) to conduct a content analysis on the masterplans of new city and town developments within the Jakarta Metropolitan Area (JMA). The UNFF promotes the creation of multiple positive visions of nature in cities by considering three broad nature perspectives: Nature for Nature, Nature for Society, and Nature as Culture, as well as emphasizing equity in these visions. Our findings show that the Nature for Society perspective tends to dominate the design of new cities in the JMA, closely followed by the Nature for Nature perspective embodied by pollution control measures. New cities also emphasise the Nature as Culture perspective through nature stewardship programmes. Based on these results, we exemplify how the UNFF can be used to further integrate nature elements in new cities’ masterplans. We conclude with a discussion of the strengths and limitations of the framework at each stage of the new city development process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定新城市中对自然有利的未来:城市自然未来框架的应用
随着城市化导致的生物多样性的日益丧失,审视和重新想象自然在城市中的位置是必要的。重新设计城市与自然之间的积极关系的机会在新兴城市的发展中尤为明显——在许多亚洲和非洲国家都观察到快速发展的地区。由于这些新城市建立在可感知的白板上,因此有可能设计出积极的自然未来。因此,本研究旨在了解如何将自然融入现有的新城市规划中,并确定这些规划中设想的亲自然视角。我们使用城市自然未来框架(UNFF)对雅加达大都市区(JMA)的新城和城镇发展总体规划进行了内容分析。联合国城市自然基金会通过考虑三种广泛的自然观点:自然为自然、自然为社会和自然作为文化,促进城市中多种积极的自然愿景的创造,并强调这些愿景的公平性。我们的研究结果表明,在JMA中,“自然为社会”的观点倾向于主导新城市的设计,紧随其后的是污染控制措施所体现的“自然为自然”的观点。新城市还通过自然管理项目强调“自然即文化”的观点。基于这些结果,我们举例说明了如何利用UNFF进一步将自然元素融入新城市的总体规划中。最后,我们讨论了该框架在新城市发展过程的每个阶段的优势和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainability Science
Sustainability Science 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Sustainability Science offers insights into interactions within and between nature and the rest of human society, and the complex mechanisms that sustain both. The journal promotes science based predictions and impact assessments of global change, and seeks ways to ensure that such knowledge can be understood by society and be used to strengthen the resilience of global natural systems (such as ecosystems, ocean and atmospheric systems, nutrient cycles), social systems (economies, governments, industry) and human systems at the individual level (lifestyles, health, security, and human values).
期刊最新文献
Mountain research for sustainability: where are we and where to go? Sufficiency policy: a definition, conceptual framework, and application to municipalities Regional agroecological stewardship: a framework to analyze the (re)territorialization of sustainable food systems Knowledge based interventions for sustainable development cooperation: insights from knowledge systems mapping in Zambia Bridging the nature–cultural heritage gap: evaluating sustainable entanglements through cemeteries in urban Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1