Investigating the Effects of High-arch and Flat Foot Deformities on Postural Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Parisa Sedaghati, Fereshteh Kazemi Pakdel, Hamed Zarei
{"title":"Investigating the Effects of High-arch and Flat Foot Deformities on Postural Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Parisa Sedaghati, Fereshteh Kazemi Pakdel, Hamed Zarei","doi":"10.18502/jmr.v17i4.13884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: High-arch and flat foot deformities can negatively impact an individual’s performance in different situations. They may also balance as well as disturb postural control, which is essential for performing optimal routine and port activities, in addition to preventing injuries. This is a comparative meta-analysis of postural control in people with high-arch and flat foot deformities with normal feet.
 Materials and Methods: This is a systematic review of articles published from 2004 to 2021 in Medline/PubMed, Embase/Scopus, LILACS, CINAHL, CENTRAL (cochrane central register of controlled trials), Web of Science, PEDro, and Google Scholar databases.
 Results: The results revealed that the total balance score in people with high-arch and flat foot deformities was lower (P=0.001), compared to normal people. However, no significant difference was observed in the total balance of people with high-arch and flat foot deformities (P>0.05). Additionally, flat-foot people showed a weaker balance in the postural control test on a force plate, when compared to individuals with high-arch feet (P=0.001). Nevertheless, the results of dynamic balance were the same for all groups (P>0.05).
 Conclusion: Our findings indicate that people with high-arch and flat foot deformities suffer from weaker postural control when compared to their normal peers. Moreover, flat-foot people showed lower scores on postural control tests on force plates, compared to subjects with higharch feet, even though they had no significant differences for static and dynamic tests. There was no difference in the results of dynamic balance among the 3 groups.","PeriodicalId":34281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Rehabilitation","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmr.v17i4.13884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: High-arch and flat foot deformities can negatively impact an individual’s performance in different situations. They may also balance as well as disturb postural control, which is essential for performing optimal routine and port activities, in addition to preventing injuries. This is a comparative meta-analysis of postural control in people with high-arch and flat foot deformities with normal feet. Materials and Methods: This is a systematic review of articles published from 2004 to 2021 in Medline/PubMed, Embase/Scopus, LILACS, CINAHL, CENTRAL (cochrane central register of controlled trials), Web of Science, PEDro, and Google Scholar databases. Results: The results revealed that the total balance score in people with high-arch and flat foot deformities was lower (P=0.001), compared to normal people. However, no significant difference was observed in the total balance of people with high-arch and flat foot deformities (P>0.05). Additionally, flat-foot people showed a weaker balance in the postural control test on a force plate, when compared to individuals with high-arch feet (P=0.001). Nevertheless, the results of dynamic balance were the same for all groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that people with high-arch and flat foot deformities suffer from weaker postural control when compared to their normal peers. Moreover, flat-foot people showed lower scores on postural control tests on force plates, compared to subjects with higharch feet, even though they had no significant differences for static and dynamic tests. There was no difference in the results of dynamic balance among the 3 groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查高足弓和平足畸形对姿势控制的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
导读:高足弓和平足畸形会在不同的情况下对个人的表现产生负面影响。除了防止受伤外,它们还可能平衡和干扰姿势控制,而姿势控制对于进行最佳的日常和港口活动至关重要。这是一项对脚正常的高足弓和平足畸形患者的姿势控制的比较荟萃分析。 材料和方法:这是对2004年至2021年在Medline/PubMed, Embase/Scopus, LILACS, CINAHL, CENTRAL (cochrane中央对照试验注册),Web of Science, PEDro和Google Scholar数据库中发表的文章的系统综述。 结果:结果显示,与正常人相比,高足弓和平足畸形患者的总平衡评分较低(P=0.001)。然而,高足弓和平足畸形患者的总平衡没有显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,与高足弓的人相比,平足的人在受力板上的姿势控制测试中表现出较弱的平衡(P=0.001)。但各组动态平衡结果相同(P>0.05)。 结论:我们的研究结果表明,与正常同龄人相比,高足弓和扁平足畸形患者的姿势控制能力较弱。此外,与足弓高的人相比,平足的人在力板上的姿势控制测试中得分较低,尽管他们在静态和动态测试中没有显著差异。三组间动态平衡结果无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Modern Rehabilitation
Journal of Modern Rehabilitation Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Impact of Semantic Operations on PersianSpeaking Aphasics: Further Evidence on the Localization View Investigating the Solutions for the Implementation of Articles 25 and 26 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation with Occupational Therapy Improves Activities of Daily Living in Traumatic Brain Injuries: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial Investigating the Predictive Factors of Life Balance in Mothers of Children with Cerebral Palsy Dry Needling Effects of the Upper Trapezius Muscle on the Angles and Range of Motion of the Neck in Individuals with Forward Head Posture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1