Analisis Fuel Ratio Pada Project Penambangan di Pit 1 PT Cahaya Riau Mandiri Jobsite PT Duta Alam Sumatera

IF 3 Q1 ECONOMICS Mineral Economics Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.33019/mineral.v8i1.4097
Yunita Yunita, Edwin Harsiga
{"title":"Analisis Fuel Ratio Pada Project Penambangan di Pit 1 PT Cahaya Riau Mandiri Jobsite PT Duta Alam Sumatera","authors":"Yunita Yunita, Edwin Harsiga","doi":"10.33019/mineral.v8i1.4097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzed the fuel ratio in mining projects to determine the factors that affected loose opportunity and the profit or losses encountered by the company. This analysis process was conduted by determining the target and realization of production where the overburden and coal getting production target in March on Fleet 1 was 68.885 bcm/month with the fuel consumption of 11.907,19 liter, on Fleet 2 was 70.944 tons/month with the fuel consumption of 11.460,38 liter, on Fleet 3 was 68.885 bcm/month with the fuel consumption of 9.611,94 liter, Fleet 4 was 68.885 bcm/month with the fuel consumption of 11.907,19 liter. Whereas, in the field the realization of overburden and coal getting production in march of Fleet 1 was 55.403,23 bcm/month, Fleet 2 was 51.907,52 tons/month, Fleet 3 was 18.259,34 bcm/month, Fleet 4 was 56.582,92 bcm/month. The planned fuel ratio on Fleet 1 was 0,17 liter/bcm, Fleet 2 was 0,16 liter/tons, Fleet 3 was 0,14 liter/bcm and Fleet 4 was 0,17 liter/bcm while the actual fuel ratio on Fleet 1 was 0,18 liter/bcm, Fleet 2 was 0,20 liter/tons, Fleet 3 was 0,16 liter/bcm, Fleet 4 was 0,18 liter/bcm and the fuel ratio difference on Fleet 1 was 0,01 liter/bcm, Fleet 2 was 0,04 liter/tons, Fleet 3 was 0,02 liter/bcm and Fleet 4 was 0,01 liter/bcm. The factors affecting the production loose opportunity from the tool working hour was breakdown, slippery, rain and wait other unit. The total cost spent by the company for the overall fuel consumption was Rp 428.989.792,00 while the overall loss was Rp 45.989.837,74 in March.","PeriodicalId":44877,"journal":{"name":"Mineral Economics","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineral Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33019/mineral.v8i1.4097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzed the fuel ratio in mining projects to determine the factors that affected loose opportunity and the profit or losses encountered by the company. This analysis process was conduted by determining the target and realization of production where the overburden and coal getting production target in March on Fleet 1 was 68.885 bcm/month with the fuel consumption of 11.907,19 liter, on Fleet 2 was 70.944 tons/month with the fuel consumption of 11.460,38 liter, on Fleet 3 was 68.885 bcm/month with the fuel consumption of 9.611,94 liter, Fleet 4 was 68.885 bcm/month with the fuel consumption of 11.907,19 liter. Whereas, in the field the realization of overburden and coal getting production in march of Fleet 1 was 55.403,23 bcm/month, Fleet 2 was 51.907,52 tons/month, Fleet 3 was 18.259,34 bcm/month, Fleet 4 was 56.582,92 bcm/month. The planned fuel ratio on Fleet 1 was 0,17 liter/bcm, Fleet 2 was 0,16 liter/tons, Fleet 3 was 0,14 liter/bcm and Fleet 4 was 0,17 liter/bcm while the actual fuel ratio on Fleet 1 was 0,18 liter/bcm, Fleet 2 was 0,20 liter/tons, Fleet 3 was 0,16 liter/bcm, Fleet 4 was 0,18 liter/bcm and the fuel ratio difference on Fleet 1 was 0,01 liter/bcm, Fleet 2 was 0,04 liter/tons, Fleet 3 was 0,02 liter/bcm and Fleet 4 was 0,01 liter/bcm. The factors affecting the production loose opportunity from the tool working hour was breakdown, slippery, rain and wait other unit. The total cost spent by the company for the overall fuel consumption was Rp 428.989.792,00 while the overall loss was Rp 45.989.837,74 in March.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PT Cahaya Riau Mandiri 工作现场 PT Duta Alam 苏门答腊 1 号矿坑采矿项目燃料比分析
本研究分析了采矿项目中的燃料比,以确定影响松散机会和公司遇到的盈亏的因素。分析过程是通过确定生产目标和生产实现来进行的,其中3月份1号机队的覆盖层和煤获得生产目标为68.885亿cm/月,燃料消耗量为11.907.19升,2号机队为70.944吨/月,燃料消耗量为11.460 38升,3号机队为68.885亿cm/月,燃料消耗量为9.611.94升,4号机队为68.885亿cm/月,燃料消耗量为11.907.19升。而现场3月份1号机队的上覆岩和采煤实现量为55.403、23亿cm/月,2号机队为51.907、52吨/月,3号机队为18.259、34亿cm/月,4号机队为56582、92亿cm/月。舰队1的计划燃油比为0,17升/bcm,舰队2为0,16升/吨,舰队3为0,14升/bcm,舰队4为0,17升/bcm,而舰队1的实际燃油比为0,18升/bcm,舰队2为0,20升/吨,舰队3为0,16升/bcm,舰队4为0,18升/bcm,舰队1的燃油比差异为0,01升/bcm,舰队2为0,04升/吨,舰队3为0,02升/bcm,舰队4为0,01升/bcm。从刀具工作时间来看,影响生产松动机会的因素主要有故障、滑滑、下雨等。公司整体燃油消耗的总成本为428.989.79.2万卢比,而3月份的总损失为45.989.837,74卢比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Mineral Economics – Raw Materials Report is an international multidisciplinary journal focused on economics and policy issues in the minerals metals and mining industries. The journal exists to improve the understanding of economic social environmental and political implications of natural resources. The main focus is on non-fuel minerals metals and the mining industry and its role in society.Mineral Economics is widening its scope and particularly invites papers on: Socio-economic aspects of mining e.g. social license to operate indigenous peoples theory of change Materials for the Green transition e.g. battery metals ICT elements policies to secure supply of these elements Minerals in the periphery e.g. the Arctic deep-seabed and space Mineral Economics serves as a platform for academics industry practitioners decision makers and other experts who want to share perspectives and knowledge about natural resources.A wide range of topics have traditionally been covered including among others: mineral market analysis exploration and development resource availability market development price formation international trade environmental policy sustainability issues competition issues.Mineral Economics is a joint project of Lule? University of Technology and R?varugruppen Ekonomisk F?rening the organization which founded the journal Raw Materials Report in 1981
期刊最新文献
Incorporation price uncertainty into open-pit to underground mine transition The dynamics and long-term availability of the total resources from the geosphere and technosphere—re-examined The nationalization of the large-scale copper mines in Chile: successful investment or financial failure? Does participation in mining activities affect the profitability of food crops production? Evidence from Ghana Metals at the nexus: renewable vs. nuclear energy systems, metal import requirements, and energy security in the European Union
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1