Putting the “Mix” in Mixed Methods: How to Integrate Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Early Childhood Special Education Research

IF 2 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Topics in Early Childhood Special Education Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1177/02711214231199268
Hailey R. Love, Angel Fettig, Elizabeth A. Steed
{"title":"Putting the “Mix” in Mixed Methods: How to Integrate Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Early Childhood Special Education Research","authors":"Hailey R. Love, Angel Fettig, Elizabeth A. Steed","doi":"10.1177/02711214231199268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mixed methods research (MMR) has the potential to be a powerful tool to expand the ways early intervention/early childhood special education (EI/ECSE) scholarship understands and informs practice. Integration, or the purposeful combination of quantitative and qualitative research approaches, is central for rigorous MMR. However, it can be challenging to identify and enact integration because integration processes and procedures can vary greatly depending on a study’s purpose(s), design, and underlying philosophical assumptions and priorities. In this article, we offer guidance on ways EI/ECSE researchers can engage in meaningful and purposeful integration. We highlight three critical decision-making points: integration dimension or type, integration timing, and relative emphasis of methods when integrating. Additionally, we discuss related considerations to particularly ensure strong qualitative designs and integration within MMR.","PeriodicalId":47496,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Early Childhood Special Education","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Early Childhood Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214231199268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mixed methods research (MMR) has the potential to be a powerful tool to expand the ways early intervention/early childhood special education (EI/ECSE) scholarship understands and informs practice. Integration, or the purposeful combination of quantitative and qualitative research approaches, is central for rigorous MMR. However, it can be challenging to identify and enact integration because integration processes and procedures can vary greatly depending on a study’s purpose(s), design, and underlying philosophical assumptions and priorities. In this article, we offer guidance on ways EI/ECSE researchers can engage in meaningful and purposeful integration. We highlight three critical decision-making points: integration dimension or type, integration timing, and relative emphasis of methods when integrating. Additionally, we discuss related considerations to particularly ensure strong qualitative designs and integration within MMR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合方法中的“混合”:如何在幼儿特殊教育研究中整合定量与定性研究
混合方法研究(MMR)有潜力成为一个强大的工具,以扩大早期干预/早期儿童特殊教育(EI/ECSE)奖学金理解和指导实践的方式。整合,或定量和定性研究方法的有目的的结合,是严格的MMR的核心。然而,识别和制定集成可能是具有挑战性的,因为集成过程和程序可能根据研究的目的、设计和潜在的哲学假设和优先级而有很大的不同。在本文中,我们为EI/ECSE研究人员如何进行有意义和有目的的整合提供了指导。我们强调了三个关键的决策点:整合的维度或类型,整合的时机,以及在整合时相对强调的方法。此外,我们还讨论了相关的考虑因素,以确保在MMR中进行强有力的定性设计和集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Topics in Early Childhood Special Education (TECSE) communicates information about early intervention, which is defined broadly and includes services provided to (a) infants, toddlers, and preschoolers who are at risk for or display developmental delays and disabilities and (b) the families of such youngsters. TECSE includes articles on personnel preparation, policy issues, and operation of intervention programs. The intent is to publish information that will improve the lives of young children and their families. Manuscripts from (a) diverse theoretical perspectives, (b) all disciplines related to early intervention, and (c) all authors with information of value to the early intervention community are welcome. There are two topical issues—which address an identified problem, trend, or subject of concern and importance to early intervention—and two non-topical issues.
期刊最新文献
Fostering Dialogic Reading Through Older Siblings in Immigrant Latino Families: A Pilot Study Absolute Thinking Gets Us Absolutely Nowhere: Resisting False Dilemmas in Early Academics Emotion Talk in Early Childhood: A Systematic Literature Review Future Topics A Survey and Content Analysis of the Quality of Behavior Guidance Policies in Tennessee Early Childhood Programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1