Can Knowledge, Responsibility and Environmentalism Explain Preference Heterogeneity? A Latent-Class Probit Model Analysis for Plastic Pollution Abatement

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Water Economics and Policy Pub Date : 2023-10-28 DOI:10.1142/s2382624x23500091
Emmanouil Tyllianakis
{"title":"Can Knowledge, Responsibility and Environmentalism Explain Preference Heterogeneity? A Latent-Class Probit Model Analysis for Plastic Pollution Abatement","authors":"Emmanouil Tyllianakis","doi":"10.1142/s2382624x23500091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the impact of prior experiences, environmental concern and awareness levels on pro-environmental behavior in the context of mitigation of plastic pollution. Using survey and geo-location data after a tsunami and a monsoon season, this survey employs a latent class analysis through a Generalized Structural Equation Model (GSEM) to identify similarities between groups’ willingness to pay (WTP) to mitigate macroplastic pollution in riverbeds and beaches in Indonesia. Results show that more environmentally-conscious respondents were also more sensitive to the issue of pollution while having observed more plastic pollution also increases support for pollution mitigation. Proximity to polluted waterways also increased WTP, especially to urban participants. Overall, accounting for prior experiences, environmental concern and awareness levels does lead to statistical differences between classes, with those scoring higher in these categories being also more willing to monetarily contribute to mitigate that issue. The use of such an integrated latent class model (LCM) can help with disentangling drivers of preferences, especially in the context of determining levels of support for pollution abatement in a developing country.","PeriodicalId":48492,"journal":{"name":"Water Economics and Policy","volume":"1 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2382624x23500091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the impact of prior experiences, environmental concern and awareness levels on pro-environmental behavior in the context of mitigation of plastic pollution. Using survey and geo-location data after a tsunami and a monsoon season, this survey employs a latent class analysis through a Generalized Structural Equation Model (GSEM) to identify similarities between groups’ willingness to pay (WTP) to mitigate macroplastic pollution in riverbeds and beaches in Indonesia. Results show that more environmentally-conscious respondents were also more sensitive to the issue of pollution while having observed more plastic pollution also increases support for pollution mitigation. Proximity to polluted waterways also increased WTP, especially to urban participants. Overall, accounting for prior experiences, environmental concern and awareness levels does lead to statistical differences between classes, with those scoring higher in these categories being also more willing to monetarily contribute to mitigate that issue. The use of such an integrated latent class model (LCM) can help with disentangling drivers of preferences, especially in the context of determining levels of support for pollution abatement in a developing country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识、责任和环境主义能解释偏好异质性吗?塑料污染治理的潜在类概率模型分析
本研究探讨在减少塑胶污染的背景下,先前经验、环境关注和意识水平对亲环境行为的影响。本调查使用海啸和季风季节后的调查和地理位置数据,通过广义结构方程模型(GSEM)采用潜在类别分析,以确定各群体为减轻印度尼西亚河床和海滩的宏观塑料污染而支付意愿(WTP)之间的相似性。结果表明,更有环保意识的受访者对污染问题也更敏感,而观察到更多的塑料污染也增加了对减轻污染的支持。靠近受污染的水道也增加了WTP,尤其是城市参与者。总体而言,考虑到之前的经历、环境关注和意识水平,确实会导致不同阶层之间的统计差异,在这些类别中得分较高的人也更愿意为缓解这一问题做出金钱贡献。使用这种综合潜在类别模型(LCM)有助于理清偏好驱动因素,特别是在确定发展中国家对减少污染的支持水平方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Book Review — A Transboundary Water Management that Works: Review of the Book Border Water by Steve Mumme Editorial: Special Issue on Economics of Water Technology Diffusion and Policy Uncertainties Investigating Corruption in the Water Sector: An Interview with Lance Williams, California investigative reporter Author Index Volume 9 (2023) Comparing Flood Damages to an Industrial Region in Turkey, Using Several Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1