The role of probiotics and synbiotics on treatment of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis

Arresta Vitasatria Suastika MD , I Gde Raka Widiana PhD, MD , Ni Nengah Dwi Fatmawati PhD, MD , Ketut Suastika PhD, MD , Ivana Beatrice Paulus MD , I Nengah Sujaya PhD, M AgrSc, B.Eng
{"title":"The role of probiotics and synbiotics on treatment of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Arresta Vitasatria Suastika MD ,&nbsp;I Gde Raka Widiana PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Ni Nengah Dwi Fatmawati PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Ketut Suastika PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Ivana Beatrice Paulus MD ,&nbsp;I Nengah Sujaya PhD, M AgrSc, B.Eng","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>This review investigated the efficacy of probiotics and/or synbiotics in gestational diabetes mellitus treatment by targeting insulin resistance, lipid metabolism, and anti-inflammatory effects in an updated trial.</p></div><div><h3>DATA SOURCES</h3><p>The literature review was performed using the key words “Probiotics,” “Synbiotics,” and “Gestational Diabetes” in several databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA</h3><p>Eligible publication was screened independently by 2 reviewers. Studies included provided at least 1 of the following outcomes: (1) blood glucose marker, including fasting blood glucose level, fasting serum insulin level, and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance; (2) blood lipid profiles, including triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and (3) nitric oxide and C-reactive protein.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>All studies were reviewed using the critical appraisal Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The descriptions of the extracted data were guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews 2020 statement with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. This study was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (identification number: CRD42022375665).</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>From 13 randomized controlled trials involving 896 patients, individuals with probiotic had significant reduction on homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (mean difference, −0.72; 95% confidence interval, −1.07 to −0.38; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em>, 96%; <em>P</em>=.00), fasting blood glucose level (mean difference, −3.79; 95% confidence interval, −6.24 to −1.34; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em>, 93%; <em>P</em>=.00), and insulin level (mean difference, −2.43 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval, −3.37 to −1.48; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em>, 54%; <em>P</em>=.00). Meanwhile for profile lipid, significant reduction of the mean difference was observed in the triglyceride (mean difference, −17.73 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval, −29.55 to − 5.9; <em>P</em>=.003) and C-reactive protein (mean difference, −1.93 dL; 95% confidence interval, −2.3 to −1.56; <em>P</em>=.00).</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>Probiotic and synbiotic supplementations reduced the risk of insulin resistance and improved glycemic control, blood lipid profiles, and inflammation in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Probiotics may be a viable option for gestational diabetes mellitus treatment; however, large-scale, well-designed randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are required before they can be recommended to patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577823001272/pdfft?md5=91f43a5548f993ce18222e5e41e2e6a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666577823001272-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577823001272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This review investigated the efficacy of probiotics and/or synbiotics in gestational diabetes mellitus treatment by targeting insulin resistance, lipid metabolism, and anti-inflammatory effects in an updated trial.

DATA SOURCES

The literature review was performed using the key words “Probiotics,” “Synbiotics,” and “Gestational Diabetes” in several databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligible publication was screened independently by 2 reviewers. Studies included provided at least 1 of the following outcomes: (1) blood glucose marker, including fasting blood glucose level, fasting serum insulin level, and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance; (2) blood lipid profiles, including triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and (3) nitric oxide and C-reactive protein.

METHODS

All studies were reviewed using the critical appraisal Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The descriptions of the extracted data were guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews 2020 statement with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. This study was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (identification number: CRD42022375665).

RESULTS

From 13 randomized controlled trials involving 896 patients, individuals with probiotic had significant reduction on homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (mean difference, −0.72; 95% confidence interval, −1.07 to −0.38; I2, 96%; P=.00), fasting blood glucose level (mean difference, −3.79; 95% confidence interval, −6.24 to −1.34; I2, 93%; P=.00), and insulin level (mean difference, −2.43 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval, −3.37 to −1.48; I2, 54%; P=.00). Meanwhile for profile lipid, significant reduction of the mean difference was observed in the triglyceride (mean difference, −17.73 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval, −29.55 to − 5.9; P=.003) and C-reactive protein (mean difference, −1.93 dL; 95% confidence interval, −2.3 to −1.56; P=.00).

CONCLUSION

Probiotic and synbiotic supplementations reduced the risk of insulin resistance and improved glycemic control, blood lipid profiles, and inflammation in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Probiotics may be a viable option for gestational diabetes mellitus treatment; however, large-scale, well-designed randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are required before they can be recommended to patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
益生菌和合成益生菌对治疗妊娠糖尿病的作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:本综述通过一项最新试验,针对胰岛素抵抗、脂质代谢和抗炎作用,研究了益生菌和/或合成益生菌在妊娠糖尿病治疗中的疗效。数据来源在多个数据库中使用关键词 "益生菌"、"合成益生菌 "和 "妊娠糖尿病 "进行了文献综述,这些数据库包括 PubMed、ScienceDirect 和 Cochrane 对照试验中央注册中心。纳入的研究至少提供了以下一种结果:(1)血糖指标,包括空腹血糖水平、空腹血清胰岛素水平和稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗;(2)血脂概况,包括甘油三酯、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇;以及(3)一氧化氮和 C 反应蛋白。方法使用针对随机试验的批判性评估 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具对所有研究进行审查。对提取数据的描述以《2020 年系统综述首选报告项目》声明为指导,并采用建议分级评估、开发和评价方法。本研究已在系统综述国际前瞻性注册数据库中注册(识别码:CRD42022375665)。结果从涉及 896 名患者的 13 项随机对照试验中发现,服用益生菌的个体可显著降低体内平衡模型评估的胰岛素抵抗(平均差,-0.72;95% 置信区间,-1.07 至-0.38;I2,96%;P=.00)、空腹血糖水平(平均差异,-3.79;95% 置信区间,-6.24 至-1.34;I2,93%;P=.00)和胰岛素水平(平均差异,-2.43 mg/dL;95% 置信区间,-3.37 至-1.48;I2,54%;P=.00)。同时,在血脂方面,观察到甘油三酯(平均差异为-17.73 mg/dL;95% 置信区间为-29.55 至-5.9;P=.003)和 C 反应蛋白(平均差异为-1.结论补充益生菌和合成益生菌可降低胰岛素抵抗的风险,改善妊娠糖尿病妇女的血糖控制、血脂状况和炎症反应。益生菌可能是治疗妊娠糖尿病的一种可行选择;然而,在向患者推荐益生菌之前,还需要进行大规模、设计良好、随访时间较长的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute Sheehan syndrome following massive postpartum hemorrhage due to vulvar hematoma The role of the RHOA/ROCK pathway in the regulation of myometrial stages throughout pregnancy Thoughts and opinions about fertility preservation and family building from the transgender community—an interview-based approach Guillain-Barré syndrome in pregnancy: a case report and review of the literature Using machine learning to predict the risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy using a contemporary nulliparous cohort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1