Comparison of Instructors' Experiences in Distance Education and Face-to-Face Education Processes

Sedat AKÇURU, Mustafa ERDEMİR
{"title":"Comparison of Instructors' Experiences in Distance Education and Face-to-Face Education Processes","authors":"Sedat AKÇURU, Mustafa ERDEMİR","doi":"10.24106/kefdergi-2023-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to reveal the experiences of lecturers regarding this phenomenon in the process of transition to distance education due to the Covid-19 pandemic and to compare these experiences with face-to-face education. For this purpose, a phenomenological design, which is a method of qualitative research, was used in the study, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 lecturers. The interviews were subjected to content analysis and as a result of the analysis, the lecturers' views on distance education were revealed. The lecturers evaluated distance education negatively because of limited interaction, lack of communication, insufficient technological tools and equipment, technical infrastructure problems, measurement and evaluation not reflecting the reality, and this education model is not suitable for applied courses. In the distance education process, there were differences compared to face-to-face education in the general teaching of the course, the methods and techniques used, the activity of the stakeholders, the time used for a course and the completion of the content of the course planned until the end of the semester. The advantages of face-to-face education were listed as the ease of involving students in the course process, the fact that validity and reliability reflect the reality, and the ease of interaction and communication.","PeriodicalId":342758,"journal":{"name":"Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi-2023-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study is to reveal the experiences of lecturers regarding this phenomenon in the process of transition to distance education due to the Covid-19 pandemic and to compare these experiences with face-to-face education. For this purpose, a phenomenological design, which is a method of qualitative research, was used in the study, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 lecturers. The interviews were subjected to content analysis and as a result of the analysis, the lecturers' views on distance education were revealed. The lecturers evaluated distance education negatively because of limited interaction, lack of communication, insufficient technological tools and equipment, technical infrastructure problems, measurement and evaluation not reflecting the reality, and this education model is not suitable for applied courses. In the distance education process, there were differences compared to face-to-face education in the general teaching of the course, the methods and techniques used, the activity of the stakeholders, the time used for a course and the completion of the content of the course planned until the end of the semester. The advantages of face-to-face education were listed as the ease of involving students in the course process, the fact that validity and reliability reflect the reality, and the ease of interaction and communication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程教育与面对面教育过程中教师经验的比较
本研究的目的是揭示由于新冠肺炎大流行,讲师在向远程教育过渡的过程中对这一现象的经验,并将这些经验与面对面教育进行比较。为此,本研究采用了一种定性研究方法现象学设计,并对18位讲师进行了半结构化访谈。对访谈进行内容分析,分析结果揭示了讲师对远程教育的看法。讲师对远程教育的评价不高,主要原因是互动有限、缺乏沟通、技术工具和设备不足、技术基础设施存在问题、测量和评价不反映实际情况,这种教育模式不适合应用课程。在远程教育过程中,与面对面教育相比,在课程的一般教学、使用的方法和技术、利益相关者的活动、课程使用的时间以及完成课程计划的内容到学期结束等方面存在差异。面对面教育的优点被列举为便于学生参与课程过程,效度和信度反映现实,便于互动和交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Integrated Turkish and Science Activities in Pre-School Education on Children's Environmental Perception An Analysis of Item Bias in the PISA 2018 Reading Understanding and Memorising Strategies Questionnaire Adaptation of the Environmental Worry Index into Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study on Teacher Candidates Investigation of the Effect of Teaching the Unit "Chemistry is everywhere" by Argumentation on Academic Achievement and Some Variables A Learner-Centred International Perspective on the Advantages of Distance Thesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1