Antibiotic Resistance Pattern in Intensive Care Units in a Large Referral Hospital in Iran

Samaneh Salarvand, Alireza Abdollahi, Pegah Afarinesh Khaki, Mahsa Norouzi Shadehi, Mohammad Taghi Beigh Mohammadi, Seyed Amir Miratashi Yazdi, Elham Nazar
{"title":"Antibiotic Resistance Pattern in Intensive Care Units in a Large Referral Hospital in Iran","authors":"Samaneh Salarvand, Alireza Abdollahi, Pegah Afarinesh Khaki, Mahsa Norouzi Shadehi, Mohammad Taghi Beigh Mohammadi, Seyed Amir Miratashi Yazdi, Elham Nazar","doi":"10.30699/ijp.2023.1990807.3073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Objective: Antibiotic resistance, especially in the form of multidrug-resistant (MDR), is a big problem, especially in intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to evaluate antibiotic resistance and MDR patterns among patients hospitalized in the ICUs in one of the large referral centers in Iran.Methods: The present study was conducted at Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran (a great referral hospital), which admits critically ill patients requiring ICU services. To determine the rate of positive cultures for resistant strains, the patient’s blood specimens were sent to the laboratory of the hospital for inoculation on proper culture media within 2 hours of extraction. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were done using the Bauer–Kirby disk diffusion method.Results: A total of 1,755 samples were collected from the patients to assess microbial strains and antibiotic resistance. The most common microbial strains detected in the cultures extracted from peripheral blood samples were Klebsiella pneumonia (22.1%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (7.9%) and another coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (15.0%). The antibiogram test showed antibiotic resistance in 1,509 cases, leading to a resistance prevalence rate of 85.9%. The most common antimicrobial resistance observed was against cotrimoxazole (61.7%), ciprofloxacin (51.3%), imipenem (50.0%), and ampicillin (49.6%). The rate of MDR was found to be 96.3%.Conclusion: In Iran’s ICUs, a significantly high level of antibiotic resistance may be seen especially the MDR pattern, which indicates the need to change the pattern of prescribing and managing these drugs in ICU centers.","PeriodicalId":38900,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Pathology","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/ijp.2023.1990807.3073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Objective: Antibiotic resistance, especially in the form of multidrug-resistant (MDR), is a big problem, especially in intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to evaluate antibiotic resistance and MDR patterns among patients hospitalized in the ICUs in one of the large referral centers in Iran.Methods: The present study was conducted at Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran (a great referral hospital), which admits critically ill patients requiring ICU services. To determine the rate of positive cultures for resistant strains, the patient’s blood specimens were sent to the laboratory of the hospital for inoculation on proper culture media within 2 hours of extraction. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were done using the Bauer–Kirby disk diffusion method.Results: A total of 1,755 samples were collected from the patients to assess microbial strains and antibiotic resistance. The most common microbial strains detected in the cultures extracted from peripheral blood samples were Klebsiella pneumonia (22.1%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (7.9%) and another coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (15.0%). The antibiogram test showed antibiotic resistance in 1,509 cases, leading to a resistance prevalence rate of 85.9%. The most common antimicrobial resistance observed was against cotrimoxazole (61.7%), ciprofloxacin (51.3%), imipenem (50.0%), and ampicillin (49.6%). The rate of MDR was found to be 96.3%.Conclusion: In Iran’s ICUs, a significantly high level of antibiotic resistance may be seen especially the MDR pattern, which indicates the need to change the pattern of prescribing and managing these drugs in ICU centers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗一家大型转诊医院重症监护病房的抗生素耐药性模式
背景与目的:抗生素耐药性,特别是多药耐药(MDR)是一个大问题,特别是在重症监护病房(icu)。本研究旨在评估伊朗一家大型转诊中心icu住院患者的抗生素耐药性和耐多药模式。方法:本研究在德黑兰伊玛目霍梅尼医院(一家大型转诊医院)进行,该医院收治需要ICU服务的危重患者。为确定耐药菌株的阳性培养率,患者血样在提取后2小时内送医院实验室在合适的培养基上接种。采用Bauer-Kirby纸片扩散法进行药敏试验。结果:共采集患者标本1755份,评估微生物菌株及抗生素耐药性。外周血培养物中检出最多的微生物菌株为肺炎克雷伯菌(22.1%)、表皮葡萄球菌(7.9%)和另一种凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(15.0%)。抗生素谱试验显示1509例有耐药性,耐药率为85.9%。最常见的抗菌药物耐药性为复方新诺明(61.7%)、环丙沙星(51.3%)、亚胺培南(50.0%)和氨苄西林(49.6%)。MDR检出率为96.3%。结论:在伊朗ICU中,抗生素耐药水平明显较高,特别是耐多药模式,这表明ICU中心需要改变这些药物的处方和管理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Pathology
Iranian Journal of Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Ki-67 Labeling Index Quantification by Eye-rolling, Manual Count, and Digital Image Analysis; An Approach with Caution. Comprehensive Analysis of the Prognostic Marker and Immune Infiltrates of LDLR-Related Proteins Family Members in Breast Cancer. Do Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) 2 and 3 Proteins Play a Role in Prognosis of Invasive Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma? Effective Ki-67 Reduction by Pre-Surgery Short-Term Administration of Letrozole in (Hormone-Positive) Breast Cancer. FABP4, GINS2 and CBX7 Expression in Cancer Cervix Tissues: Clinical, Pathological and Prognostic Implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1