Book review: Maria Carinnes P Alejandria and Will Smith, Disaster Archipelago: Locating Vulnerability and Resilience in the Philippines

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY International Journal of Comparative Sociology Pub Date : 2023-03-23 DOI:10.1177/00207152231163461
Victoria Reyes
{"title":"Book review: Maria Carinnes P Alejandria and Will Smith, <i>Disaster Archipelago: Locating Vulnerability and Resilience in the Philippines</i>","authors":"Victoria Reyes","doi":"10.1177/00207152231163461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"certainly right that corporate America has largely embraced the “cookbook” and the “strange bedfellows and the messy compromises . . . would have been less problematic had unions been stronger, pension funds better funded, and fiduciary rules more flexible” (p. 224). Nonetheless, what I felt was missing from the book was a larger theoretical assessment of what labor’s hand in finance has been. For example, if public pension funds are contributing to private sector downsizing, what has this meant more broadly for intra-class inequality? Surely, this has stoked divisions by sector, region, or race and reshaped the political environment. Equally warranted is some reflection on Brandeis’ hope in shining “sunlight” on corporate behavior. Transparency is important and has been shown to improve worker wages (Rosenfeld and Denice, 2015). But is this liberal goal really sufficient for redistributing power? More pragmatically, would it galvanize workers enough to sustain the risks of an organizing drive? A bigger question remains too regarding the way finance affects class solidarity. It is well known that the anti-Communist Taft–Hartley Act of 1947 made American labor unions less solidaristic, more conservative, and more defensive of their own membership base. I strongly suspect labor’s financial strategy has not helped in this regard. Yet, “finance” does not just refer to rapacious Wall Street firms. Possibilities exist for radically altering finance for the public good and labor specifically (Block, 2019; McCarthy, 2019). It would have been helpful had Jacoby, who has a deep understanding of this topic, ruminated on these historical lessons. To be fair, Jacoby’s background is in history which is less prone to making theoretical pronouncements. His detailed accounting of an important topic opens space to pursue more work on the topic. Sociologists of labor, organizations, and finance interested in these theoretical questions will find the book to be an excellent starting point.","PeriodicalId":51601,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152231163461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

certainly right that corporate America has largely embraced the “cookbook” and the “strange bedfellows and the messy compromises . . . would have been less problematic had unions been stronger, pension funds better funded, and fiduciary rules more flexible” (p. 224). Nonetheless, what I felt was missing from the book was a larger theoretical assessment of what labor’s hand in finance has been. For example, if public pension funds are contributing to private sector downsizing, what has this meant more broadly for intra-class inequality? Surely, this has stoked divisions by sector, region, or race and reshaped the political environment. Equally warranted is some reflection on Brandeis’ hope in shining “sunlight” on corporate behavior. Transparency is important and has been shown to improve worker wages (Rosenfeld and Denice, 2015). But is this liberal goal really sufficient for redistributing power? More pragmatically, would it galvanize workers enough to sustain the risks of an organizing drive? A bigger question remains too regarding the way finance affects class solidarity. It is well known that the anti-Communist Taft–Hartley Act of 1947 made American labor unions less solidaristic, more conservative, and more defensive of their own membership base. I strongly suspect labor’s financial strategy has not helped in this regard. Yet, “finance” does not just refer to rapacious Wall Street firms. Possibilities exist for radically altering finance for the public good and labor specifically (Block, 2019; McCarthy, 2019). It would have been helpful had Jacoby, who has a deep understanding of this topic, ruminated on these historical lessons. To be fair, Jacoby’s background is in history which is less prone to making theoretical pronouncements. His detailed accounting of an important topic opens space to pursue more work on the topic. Sociologists of labor, organizations, and finance interested in these theoretical questions will find the book to be an excellent starting point.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:Maria Carinnes P Alejandria和Will Smith,《灾难群岛:定位菲律宾的脆弱性和复原力》
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Comparative Sociology was established in 1960 to publish the highest quality peer reviewed research that is both international in scope and comparative in method. The journal draws articles from sociologists worldwide and encourages competing perspectives. IJCS recognizes that many significant research questions are inherently interdisciplinary, and therefore welcomes work from scholars in related disciplines, including political science, geography, economics, anthropology, and business sciences. The journal is published six times a year, including special issues on topics of special interest to the international social science community.
期刊最新文献
Economic marginalization of ethnic minorities in Eastern Europe: A cross-national assessment of self-reported experiences Inequality and social harm: Revisiting the Spirit Level debate by reproducing and updating it, as well as reanalysing the data with qualitative comparative analysis Migration, social stratification, and labor market attainment: An analysis of the ethnic penalty in 12 Western European countries The role of trust in Belarusian societal mobilization (2020–2021) The financial dimension of organizational stratification in European higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1