Effect of Multifocal Intraocular Lens on Contrast Sensitivity in Primary Angle-Closure Patients

Q3 Medicine Siriraj Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.33192/smj.v75i7.263254
Naris Kitnarong, Dovchinjamts Dagvadorj
{"title":"Effect of Multifocal Intraocular Lens on Contrast Sensitivity in Primary Angle-Closure Patients","authors":"Naris Kitnarong, Dovchinjamts Dagvadorj","doi":"10.33192/smj.v75i7.263254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To study the effect of multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) implantation on contrast sensitivity (CS) compared to monofocal intraocular lens (mIOL) in primary angle-closure (PAC) or primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) patients. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included patients with PAC or PACG and visually significant cataract. Phacoemulsification with MIOL or mIOL (patient preference) was performed. Collected data included best-corrected distant visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and contrast sensitivity (CS) measured at spatial frequency 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18.0 cycles per degree (CPD) preoperatively, and at 2-6 months postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative parameters were then compared. Results: Of the 45 eyes from 35 patients that were enrolled, 33 eyes (15 PAC, 18 PACG) from 26 patients completed the study. Fourteen eyes (11 patients) received diffractive MIOL, and 19 eyes (15 patients) received aspheric mIOL. Preoperative CS was not significantly different between groups. Postoperatively, BCVA, and CS at each spatial frequency were significantly improved in both groups (all p<0.001). Mean postoperative CS at spatial frequency 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18.0 CPD was 28.03, 42.63, 44.84, 10.82, and 2.86 in the MIOL group, and 29.55, 49.63, 46.20, 16.83, and 7.09 in the mIOL group, both respectively. Postoperative CS was not significant different between groups at any spatial frequencies. IOP was decreased (p=0.001) and ACD increased (p<0.001) postoperatively in both groups. Conclusion: No significant difference in visual acuity or contrast sensitivity was observed between MIOL and mIOL after cataract removal in patients with PAC/PACG.","PeriodicalId":37270,"journal":{"name":"Siriraj Medical Journal","volume":"288 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siriraj Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i7.263254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To study the effect of multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) implantation on contrast sensitivity (CS) compared to monofocal intraocular lens (mIOL) in primary angle-closure (PAC) or primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) patients. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included patients with PAC or PACG and visually significant cataract. Phacoemulsification with MIOL or mIOL (patient preference) was performed. Collected data included best-corrected distant visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and contrast sensitivity (CS) measured at spatial frequency 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18.0 cycles per degree (CPD) preoperatively, and at 2-6 months postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative parameters were then compared. Results: Of the 45 eyes from 35 patients that were enrolled, 33 eyes (15 PAC, 18 PACG) from 26 patients completed the study. Fourteen eyes (11 patients) received diffractive MIOL, and 19 eyes (15 patients) received aspheric mIOL. Preoperative CS was not significantly different between groups. Postoperatively, BCVA, and CS at each spatial frequency were significantly improved in both groups (all p<0.001). Mean postoperative CS at spatial frequency 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18.0 CPD was 28.03, 42.63, 44.84, 10.82, and 2.86 in the MIOL group, and 29.55, 49.63, 46.20, 16.83, and 7.09 in the mIOL group, both respectively. Postoperative CS was not significant different between groups at any spatial frequencies. IOP was decreased (p=0.001) and ACD increased (p<0.001) postoperatively in both groups. Conclusion: No significant difference in visual acuity or contrast sensitivity was observed between MIOL and mIOL after cataract removal in patients with PAC/PACG.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多焦人工晶状体对原发性闭角症患者对比敏感度的影响
目的:比较原发性闭角型青光眼(PAC)和原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)患者多焦点人工晶状体(MIOL)植入术与单焦点人工晶状体(MIOL)对比敏感度(CS)的影响。材料与方法:本前瞻性研究纳入PAC或PACG合并显著性白内障患者。采用MIOL或MIOL(患者选择)进行超声乳化术。收集的数据包括术前和术后2-6个月在1.5、3.0、6.0、12.0和18.0周期/度(CPD)的空间频率下测量的最佳矫正远视力(BCVA)、眼内压(IOP)、前房深度(ACD)和对比敏感度(CS)。然后比较术前和术后参数。结果:在入选的35名患者的45只眼睛中,26名患者的33只眼睛(15只PAC, 18只PACG)完成了研究。衍射MIOL 14眼(11例),非球面MIOL 19眼(15例)。术前CS组间差异无统计学意义。两组术后各空间频率的BCVA和CS均显著改善(p < 0.001)。在空间频率1.5、3.0、6.0、12.0、18.0 CPD下,MIOL组术后平均CS分别为28.03、42.63、44.84、10.82、2.86;MIOL组术后平均CS分别为29.55、49.63、46.20、16.83、7.09。术后CS在各空间频率组间无显著差异。两组术后IOP降低(p=0.001), ACD升高(p=0.001)。结论:PAC/PACG患者摘除白内障后MIOL与MIOL的视力及对比敏感度无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Siriraj Medical Journal
Siriraj Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Incidences, Characteristics, Management and Outcomes of Different Subtypes of Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study Optimizing Perioperative Care for Elderly Surgical Patients: A Review of Strategies and Evidence-Based Practices Comparison between the Standard Teaching and the Thai Version of Blended Teaching on Basic Airway Management in Siriraj Medical Students Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) and Outcomes in Preoperative Fast-track Geriatric Patients with Hip Fracture: A Single-center Retrospective Study Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications vs Conventional Care in Warfarin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Time in the Therapeutic Range
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1