Evaluation of Digital Educational Technologies by University Teachers

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Psikhologicheskaya Nauka i Obrazovanie-Psychological Science and Education Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.17759/pse.2023280101
M.G. Sorokova, M. Odintsova, N.P. Radchikova
{"title":"Evaluation of Digital Educational Technologies by University Teachers","authors":"M.G. Sorokova, M. Odintsova, N.P. Radchikova","doi":"10.17759/pse.2023280101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A comparative analysis of the assessments of digital educational technologies by teachers (mean age &amp;ndash; 49&amp;plusmn;12 years) of various Russian Federation universities who have experience in using them in their professional activities (N=110) and teachers who do not have such experience (N=40) is carried out. The samples are equivalent in gender, academic titles and degrees, age, and work experience. The main advantages are the following: access to information at any convenient time; flexible schedule and the ability to organize independent work. Among the difficulties technical failures, lack of personal contacts, inconvenience of working with an electronic course and the need to spend a long time at the computer were noted. Teachers with experience in the development of e-learning courses rate work in an electronic environment much more positively, in contrast to teachers without experience who exaggerate the frequency of technical failures, point out the lack of technical and legal support, and the difficulties in monitoring assignments. All the teachers can be divided into &amp;ldquo;skeptics&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;enthusiasts&amp;rdquo; in relation to the acceptance of digital environment. &amp;ldquo;Enthusiasts&amp;rdquo;, unlike &amp;ldquo;skeptics&amp;rdquo;, have a positive attitude to innovations, believe that the educational process becomes more flexible and intense, emphasize the growth of student involvement and independence, individualization of training, support from management, colleagues, technical support, transparency of interaction. Most teachers with experience in using e-learning courses turned out to be &amp;ldquo;enthusiasts&amp;rdquo;. The groups of &amp;ldquo;enthusiasts&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;skeptics&amp;rdquo; do not differ in gender, age, and professional experience, which indicates the possible presence of &amp;ldquo;second order&amp;rdquo; barriers: pedagogical beliefs that prevent the acceptance of e-learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":55959,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskaya Nauka i Obrazovanie-Psychological Science and Education","volume":"222 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psikhologicheskaya Nauka i Obrazovanie-Psychological Science and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2023280101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A comparative analysis of the assessments of digital educational technologies by teachers (mean age &ndash; 49&plusmn;12 years) of various Russian Federation universities who have experience in using them in their professional activities (N=110) and teachers who do not have such experience (N=40) is carried out. The samples are equivalent in gender, academic titles and degrees, age, and work experience. The main advantages are the following: access to information at any convenient time; flexible schedule and the ability to organize independent work. Among the difficulties technical failures, lack of personal contacts, inconvenience of working with an electronic course and the need to spend a long time at the computer were noted. Teachers with experience in the development of e-learning courses rate work in an electronic environment much more positively, in contrast to teachers without experience who exaggerate the frequency of technical failures, point out the lack of technical and legal support, and the difficulties in monitoring assignments. All the teachers can be divided into &ldquo;skeptics&rdquo; and &ldquo;enthusiasts&rdquo; in relation to the acceptance of digital environment. &ldquo;Enthusiasts&rdquo;, unlike &ldquo;skeptics&rdquo;, have a positive attitude to innovations, believe that the educational process becomes more flexible and intense, emphasize the growth of student involvement and independence, individualization of training, support from management, colleagues, technical support, transparency of interaction. Most teachers with experience in using e-learning courses turned out to be &ldquo;enthusiasts&rdquo;. The groups of &ldquo;enthusiasts&rdquo; and &ldquo;skeptics&rdquo; do not differ in gender, age, and professional experience, which indicates the possible presence of &ldquo;second order&rdquo; barriers: pedagogical beliefs that prevent the acceptance of e-learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高校教师对数字教育技术的评价
< >教师对数字教育技术评价的比较分析(平均年龄&49±12年),对在专业活动中有使用它们经验的俄罗斯联邦各大学(N=110)和没有这种经验的教师(N=40)进行了调查。这些样本在性别、学术头衔和学位、年龄和工作经验方面是相同的。其主要优点有:在任何方便的时间获取信息;灵活的工作时间和独立组织工作的能力。他们指出,困难包括技术故障、缺乏个人接触、使用电子课程不方便以及需要长时间坐在电脑前。有开发电子学习课程经验的教师对电子环境中的工作的评价要积极得多,而没有经验的教师则夸大技术故障的频率,指出缺乏技术和法律支持,以及监控作业的困难。所有的老师都可以分为“怀疑派”、“怀疑派”和“怀疑派”。和,“enthusiasts&”;在接受数字环境方面。与怀疑论者不同,热衷者对创新持积极态度,认为教育过程变得更加灵活和激烈,强调学生的参与性和独立性的成长,培训的个性化,来自管理层、同事、技术支持的支持,互动的透明度。大多数有使用电子学习课程经验的教师都是“热情”的。一群“狂热者”和,“skeptics&”;不要在性别,年龄和专业经验上有所不同,这表明可能存在“二阶”。障碍:阻碍接受电子学习的教学信念。</p>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
37.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficiency of Collaborative Computer Problem Solving by the Students of Adolescence and Youth: The Contribution of Social Intelligence Using Process Data of Task Performance in Creative Thinking Assessment Determinants of Blended Teaching-Learning Performance in New Normal Environment: Exploring the Role of Teachers' Technostress as Mediation Formation of Methodological Readiness of Undergraduates of the Psychological and Pedagogical Direction for Mediation in Conditions of Blended Learning Digital Literacy, Cognitive Control and Student Use of Digital Devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1