Illusion of Inclusion: Examining Trickle-Down Effects of the Board Gender Quota Regulation in India

IF 7.2 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Gender & Society Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1177/08912432231195070
Esha Mendiratta
{"title":"Illusion of Inclusion: Examining Trickle-Down Effects of the Board Gender Quota Regulation in India","authors":"Esha Mendiratta","doi":"10.1177/08912432231195070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, I explore the consequences of the board gender quota in India, the first developing country to implement such a policy. Proponents of board gender quotas argue that such policies ought to undo the gendered organization by bolstering up appointments of women in lower ranks, starting with senior executive ranks just below the board (i.e., positive trickle-down effects). Challenging these normative arguments, I argue that deeply rooted gender structures in organizations, coupled with the nature of the board gender quota in India, may hinder such effects. After analyzing 184 of the largest publicly listed firms in India during 2007–2017, I found that the board gender quota led to an increase in the appointment of women to corporate boards, with a smaller positive effect for boards with higher numbers of female directors before the quota. However, firms reduced appointments of women to senior executive ranks below the board after the announcement of the regulation. Hence, it seems that women’s access to board positions through a quota resulted in redoing the gendered organization by reducing female appointments at senior executive levels.","PeriodicalId":48351,"journal":{"name":"Gender & Society","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432231195070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, I explore the consequences of the board gender quota in India, the first developing country to implement such a policy. Proponents of board gender quotas argue that such policies ought to undo the gendered organization by bolstering up appointments of women in lower ranks, starting with senior executive ranks just below the board (i.e., positive trickle-down effects). Challenging these normative arguments, I argue that deeply rooted gender structures in organizations, coupled with the nature of the board gender quota in India, may hinder such effects. After analyzing 184 of the largest publicly listed firms in India during 2007–2017, I found that the board gender quota led to an increase in the appointment of women to corporate boards, with a smaller positive effect for boards with higher numbers of female directors before the quota. However, firms reduced appointments of women to senior executive ranks below the board after the announcement of the regulation. Hence, it seems that women’s access to board positions through a quota resulted in redoing the gendered organization by reducing female appointments at senior executive levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包容的幻觉:审视印度董事会性别配额规定的涓滴效应
在这项研究中,我探讨了董事会性别配额在印度的后果,印度是第一个实施这种政策的发展中国家。董事会性别配额的支持者认为,这样的政策应该通过支持女性在较低级别的任命来消除性别组织,从董事会以下的高级管理人员开始(即积极的涓滴效应)。我对这些规范性论点提出质疑,认为组织中根深蒂固的性别结构,加上印度董事会性别配额的性质,可能会阻碍这种效果。在分析了2007-2017年印度184家最大的上市公司后,我发现董事会性别配额导致女性在公司董事会中的任命增加,对配额前女性董事人数较多的董事会的积极影响较小。然而,在该规定宣布后,公司减少了对董事会以下高级管理人员的任命。因此,女性通过配额进入董事会职位似乎通过减少高级管理人员中的女性任命来重塑性别组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gender & Society
Gender & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Gender & Society promotes feminist scholarship and the social scientific study of gender. Gender & Society publishes theoretically engaged and methodologically rigorous articles that make original contributions to gender theory. The journal takes a multidisciplinary, intersectional, and global approach to gender analyses.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Feeding New Orleans: Celebrity Chefs and Reimagining Food Justice By Jeanne K. Firth Book Review: Brotherhood University: Black Men’s Friendships and the Transition to Adulthood, By Brandon A. Jackson “I Would Have Given them a Piece of my Mind”: Spatialized Feelings and Emotion Work Among Racialized Muslim Women in Québec Book Review: Unsettling Queer Anthropology: Foundations, Reorientations, and Departures, Edited by Margot Weiss Walking the Orientalism Tightrope: How Muslim Americans Construct their Gender Ideologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1