Survey on lung ultrasound usage by portuguese pulmonologists

IF 0.8 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Ultrasound Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa1817
Bruno S. Silva, Beatriz Ferraz, Filipa Correia, Maria Inês Costa, Maria Esteves Brandão, Nuno Cortesão
{"title":"Survey on lung ultrasound usage by portuguese pulmonologists","authors":"Bruno S. Silva, Beatriz Ferraz, Filipa Correia, Maria Inês Costa, Maria Esteves Brandão, Nuno Cortesão","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa1817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction:</b> Lung ultrasound (LUS) performed by non-radiologist doctors has evolved over the last few decades, placing it as a useful diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring bedside tool in patients with respiratory disease. Despite its proven clinical applications, LUS training has not been standardized in Portugal. <b>Objetctives:</b> To characterize LUS learning processes and clinical usage amongst portuguese pulmonologists as well as to assess future needs. <b>Methods:</b> From August to November 2022 an online survey was sent to all members of the Portuguese Pulmonology Society. Degrees of confidence were assessed through Likert scales. Pearson’s chi-squared test and non-parametric tests were used. Outcomes were considered statistically significant if the probability of error was below 5% (p < 0.05). <b>Results:</b> 114 valid answers were obtained. Most responders (81%) had LUS training and 22% had attended other ultrasound-related courses. The majority had an ultrasound machine available. However, only 17% performed LUS > 3 times per week. Overall confidence in LUS usage for diagnostic purpose (median: 7/10), disease monitoring (median: 7/10) and support of invasive procedures (median: 8/10) were high. There was a significant relation between higher levels of confidence and regularly attending LUS courses and performing LUS > 3 times per week. The main reasons preventing regular use of LUS were availability/cost of courses, availability/cost of equipment and lack of time. <b>Conclusions:</b> Physician`s confidence degree on ultrasound utility is related to regular LUS training as well as regular usage. Costs involved with&nbsp;LUS training hamper its wider use.","PeriodicalId":23440,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa1817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lung ultrasound (LUS) performed by non-radiologist doctors has evolved over the last few decades, placing it as a useful diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring bedside tool in patients with respiratory disease. Despite its proven clinical applications, LUS training has not been standardized in Portugal. Objetctives: To characterize LUS learning processes and clinical usage amongst portuguese pulmonologists as well as to assess future needs. Methods: From August to November 2022 an online survey was sent to all members of the Portuguese Pulmonology Society. Degrees of confidence were assessed through Likert scales. Pearson’s chi-squared test and non-parametric tests were used. Outcomes were considered statistically significant if the probability of error was below 5% (p < 0.05). Results: 114 valid answers were obtained. Most responders (81%) had LUS training and 22% had attended other ultrasound-related courses. The majority had an ultrasound machine available. However, only 17% performed LUS > 3 times per week. Overall confidence in LUS usage for diagnostic purpose (median: 7/10), disease monitoring (median: 7/10) and support of invasive procedures (median: 8/10) were high. There was a significant relation between higher levels of confidence and regularly attending LUS courses and performing LUS > 3 times per week. The main reasons preventing regular use of LUS were availability/cost of courses, availability/cost of equipment and lack of time. Conclusions: Physician`s confidence degree on ultrasound utility is related to regular LUS training as well as regular usage. Costs involved with LUS training hamper its wider use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙肺科医生肺部超声使用情况调查
在过去的几十年里,由非放射科医生进行的肺超声(LUS)已经发展成为一种有用的诊断、预后和监测呼吸系统疾病患者的床边工具。尽管LUS的临床应用已得到证实,但在葡萄牙,LUS培训尚未标准化。目的:表征LUS学习过程和临床使用在葡萄牙肺科医生以及评估未来的需求。方法:于2022年8月至11月对葡萄牙肺脏学会所有会员进行在线调查。通过李克特量表评估信心程度。采用Pearson卡方检验和非参数检验。如果误差概率低于5%,则认为结果具有统计学意义(p <0.05)。结果:共获得有效答案114个。大多数应答者(81%)接受过LUS培训,22%参加过其他超声相关课程。大多数医院都有超声波机。然而,只有17%的人进行了LUS >每周3次。LUS用于诊断目的(中位数:7/10)、疾病监测(中位数:7/10)和支持侵入性手术(中位数:8/10)的总体置信度很高。较高的自信水平与定期参加LUS课程和执行LUS之间存在显著关系;每周3次。妨碍定期使用LUS的主要原因是课程的可得性/成本、设备的可得性/成本和时间的缺乏。结论:医师对超声效用的置信度与常规LUS训练及常规使用有关。美国法律培训的费用阻碍了其更广泛的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound
Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Ultrasound is the official journal of the British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS), a multidisciplinary, charitable society comprising radiologists, obstetricians, sonographers, physicists and veterinarians amongst others.
期刊最新文献
Two case reports of triple ectopic: Literature review of incidence, risk factors and management of recurrent ectopic pregnancy. Beyond the hernia in groin ultrasound. Investigation of artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support system's performance in reducing the fine needle aspiration rate of thyroid nodules: A pilot study. Advanced multimodal ultrasound for pre-operative assessment of skin tumours: A case series. Diagnostic accuracy of strain cervical elastography as a predictor for preterm delivery: A single tertiary care centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1