Bridging the gap between foster care and birth families: How the Circle of Security Parenting Programme™ inspired change within a therapeutic service for looked after children and young people

Q4 Psychology Clinical Psychology Forum Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.369.67
Sarah Hobson, Grace Heasley, Abigail Evans
{"title":"Bridging the gap between foster care and birth families: How the Circle of Security Parenting Programme™ inspired change within a therapeutic service for looked after children and young people","authors":"Sarah Hobson, Grace Heasley, Abigail Evans","doi":"10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.369.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 8 week Circle of Security Parenting Programme™ (COSP) was delivered to parents who were working with Children’s Services in Monmouthshire. The group was delivered to help support children’s transition back to birth parents following a period of time in foster care. This process highlighted the impact on parent’s human rights; not only through having their children removed from their care but their experience of parenting a child alongside a corporate parent (Children’s Services). Parents reported feeling scrutinised, unsupported and degraded at times. This led us to consider how we can promote the human rights of parents to continue to parent their child whilst also balance the rights of the child to receive safe, nurturing, predictable care. Changes to service delivery followed with more consideration and open discussion about the human rights of both parent and child during our regular consultations. In addition, we are working more closely with the Family Time Team who supervise contact between families. This work is to promote the human rights of parents and children to continue to have a positive relationship and to share this approach with our foster carers, bridging the gap between them and the birth family.","PeriodicalId":39686,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Forum","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.369.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 8 week Circle of Security Parenting Programme™ (COSP) was delivered to parents who were working with Children’s Services in Monmouthshire. The group was delivered to help support children’s transition back to birth parents following a period of time in foster care. This process highlighted the impact on parent’s human rights; not only through having their children removed from their care but their experience of parenting a child alongside a corporate parent (Children’s Services). Parents reported feeling scrutinised, unsupported and degraded at times. This led us to consider how we can promote the human rights of parents to continue to parent their child whilst also balance the rights of the child to receive safe, nurturing, predictable care. Changes to service delivery followed with more consideration and open discussion about the human rights of both parent and child during our regular consultations. In addition, we are working more closely with the Family Time Team who supervise contact between families. This work is to promote the human rights of parents and children to continue to have a positive relationship and to share this approach with our foster carers, bridging the gap between them and the birth family.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥合寄养家庭和出生家庭之间的差距:安全圈育儿计划™如何在被照顾的儿童和年轻人的治疗服务中激发变化
为期8周的安全育儿计划™(COSP)被交付给在蒙茅斯郡儿童服务机构工作的父母。该小组的目的是帮助儿童在寄养一段时间后重新回到亲生父母身边。这一进程突出了对父母人权的影响;不仅通过让孩子脱离他们的照顾,而且通过他们与企业家长一起养育孩子的经历(儿童服务机构)。父母们报告说,他们有时会感到被审视、不被支持和被贬低。这促使我们考虑如何促进父母继续养育孩子的人权,同时平衡孩子获得安全、养育和可预见的照顾的权利。在我们的定期磋商中,服务提供的变化伴随着对父母和儿童人权的更多考虑和公开讨论。此外,我们正在与家庭时间小组更密切地合作,他们监督家庭之间的联系。这项工作是为了促进父母和儿童的人权,继续保持积极的关系,并与我们的寄养照顾者分享这种方法,弥合他们与出生家庭之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Forum
Clinical Psychology Forum Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Service evaluation of reflective parenting groups: What are parents’ perspectives on the usefulness of RP groups in improving parental mentalisation and reflective functioning? A service evaluation exploring ethnic monitoring in a Specialist Perinatal Mental Health service: Barriers and improvement opportunities Building families through MAR (medically assisted reproduction), donor conception and surrogacy: Where does this fit into clinical psychology? Learning from reflection – good practice in handover with neurodiverse clients Racialised minority women’s experiences of psychological intervention across perinatal and maternal mental health services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1