The Representation of Cross-Border Surrogacy in Australian Surrogacy Events

Yingyi Luo, Denise Cuthbert, Shelley Marshall
{"title":"The Representation of Cross-Border Surrogacy in Australian Surrogacy Events","authors":"Yingyi Luo, Denise Cuthbert, Shelley Marshall","doi":"10.3138/ijfab-2022-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a method of family formation, cross-border surrogacy is controversial and beset by risks of exploitation. This article extends the literature on surrogacy by examining the way Australian surrogacy promotion and information events represent cross-border surrogacy. It examines the emerging phenomenon of surrogacy events held by a not-for-profit surrogacy organization to promote cross-border surrogacy in Australia—a country that prohibits commercial surrogacy. The article draws on observations from a series of surrogacy events in Australia and online during the 2019–21 time period. It examines the presentations given at these events by surrogacy facilitators, surrogate mothers, and intended parents. We observed four themes: (1) Intended parents are positioned as consumers, (2) the benefits of cross-border commercial surrogacy are highlighted relative to other methods of family formation, (3) the positive side of cross-border surrogacy is accentuated, and (4) reproductive rights are emphasized. These representations run counter to feminist framings of cross-border surrogacy as exploitative and risky. This paper understands that the framing of surrogacy that occurs at these promotion events to be neoliberal in nature. The conceptualization helps explain their consumerist peppiness and commodifying subjectivity.","PeriodicalId":44698,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Feminist Approaches To Bioethics","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Feminist Approaches To Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-2022-0030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a method of family formation, cross-border surrogacy is controversial and beset by risks of exploitation. This article extends the literature on surrogacy by examining the way Australian surrogacy promotion and information events represent cross-border surrogacy. It examines the emerging phenomenon of surrogacy events held by a not-for-profit surrogacy organization to promote cross-border surrogacy in Australia—a country that prohibits commercial surrogacy. The article draws on observations from a series of surrogacy events in Australia and online during the 2019–21 time period. It examines the presentations given at these events by surrogacy facilitators, surrogate mothers, and intended parents. We observed four themes: (1) Intended parents are positioned as consumers, (2) the benefits of cross-border commercial surrogacy are highlighted relative to other methods of family formation, (3) the positive side of cross-border surrogacy is accentuated, and (4) reproductive rights are emphasized. These representations run counter to feminist framings of cross-border surrogacy as exploitative and risky. This paper understands that the framing of surrogacy that occurs at these promotion events to be neoliberal in nature. The conceptualization helps explain their consumerist peppiness and commodifying subjectivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨境代孕在澳大利亚代孕事件中的表现
作为一种组建家庭的方式,跨境代孕备受争议,并存在被剥削的风险。本文通过考察澳大利亚代孕推广和信息活动代表跨境代孕的方式,扩展了代孕方面的文献。它考察了在禁止商业代孕的澳大利亚,一个非营利代孕组织为推广跨境代孕而举办的代孕活动的新兴现象。这篇文章借鉴了2019-21年期间澳大利亚和网上的一系列代孕事件的观察结果。它审查了在这些活动中由代孕促进者、代孕母亲和准父母所作的介绍。我们观察到四个主题:(1)意向父母被定位为消费者;(2)跨境商业代孕相对于其他家庭组建方式的好处被强调;(3)跨境代孕的积极一面被强调;(4)生殖权利被强调。这些表述与女权主义者认为跨境代孕具有剥削性和风险的观点背道而驰。本文认为,在这些推广活动中出现的替代框架本质上是新自由主义的。这种概念化有助于解释他们的消费主义幸福感和商品化主体性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
56
期刊最新文献
Male Fertility-Related mHealth: Does It Create New Vulnerabilities? The Responsibility Objection to Thomson Re-imagined: What If Men Were Held to a Parallel Standard? Autonomy Without Borders? Understanding the Impact of Undocumented Residence Status on Healthcare Relationships in Belgium Abortion to Abolition: Reproductive Health and Justice in Canada by Martha Paynter What Feminist Bioethics Can Bring to Synthetic Biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1