AN OUTRANKING ELECTRE-BASED MODELING FOR SETTING THE NAVAL CORE COMPONENTS OF AN AMPHIBIOUS TASK FORCE

Q4 Decision Sciences Pesquisa Operacional Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0101-7438.2023.043.00262058
Helder Gomes Costa, Raphael Corrêa Silva, Leonardo Antonio Monteiro Pessôa
{"title":"AN OUTRANKING ELECTRE-BASED MODELING FOR SETTING THE NAVAL CORE COMPONENTS OF AN AMPHIBIOUS TASK FORCE","authors":"Helder Gomes Costa, Raphael Corrêa Silva, Leonardo Antonio Monteiro Pessôa","doi":"10.1590/0101-7438.2023.043.00262058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selecting the naval components to be part of a task force is a typical setting decision problem wherein each component of the task force should complement the others. This decision situation calls for the use of outranking modeling tools instead of the additive ones, which are usually used when selecting group components. This study applies Electre I to develop an original approach to this hypothetical problem: the composition of the Amphibian Readiness Group, used in the United States. Despite being a hypothetical decision situation, the work uses real data from American media. We use Electre I because it is a native outranking multicriteria decision method, designed to address choice decisions. Moreover, we take the support of The Visual Outdeck web app (Outranking Decision and Knowledge app) to implement the model and the Electre I multicriteria algorithm and a sensitivity analysis of the results regarding the weights and the agreement and disagreement cut-off levels. Further we apply the same input data to an additive decision algorithm, allowing comparison of the results. Consequently, we established the setting of the task force by utilizing elements that optimally complement the others in the task force configuration. Furthermore, the study finds that this task force differs from the one that should be constituted using traditional additive modeling. The main contribution of this study is that it provides a robust discussion and original modeling that supports military decision-makers while selecting a better set of military taskforces.","PeriodicalId":35341,"journal":{"name":"Pesquisa Operacional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesquisa Operacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-7438.2023.043.00262058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selecting the naval components to be part of a task force is a typical setting decision problem wherein each component of the task force should complement the others. This decision situation calls for the use of outranking modeling tools instead of the additive ones, which are usually used when selecting group components. This study applies Electre I to develop an original approach to this hypothetical problem: the composition of the Amphibian Readiness Group, used in the United States. Despite being a hypothetical decision situation, the work uses real data from American media. We use Electre I because it is a native outranking multicriteria decision method, designed to address choice decisions. Moreover, we take the support of The Visual Outdeck web app (Outranking Decision and Knowledge app) to implement the model and the Electre I multicriteria algorithm and a sensitivity analysis of the results regarding the weights and the agreement and disagreement cut-off levels. Further we apply the same input data to an additive decision algorithm, allowing comparison of the results. Consequently, we established the setting of the task force by utilizing elements that optimally complement the others in the task force configuration. Furthermore, the study finds that this task force differs from the one that should be constituted using traditional additive modeling. The main contribution of this study is that it provides a robust discussion and original modeling that supports military decision-makers while selecting a better set of military taskforces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于设置两栖特遣部队海军核心部件的高级电子建模
选择海军组成部分作为特遣部队的一部分是一个典型的设置决策问题,其中特遣部队的每个组成部分都应相互补充。这种决策情况要求使用超排序建模工具,而不是通常在选择组组件时使用的附加建模工具。本研究应用电学ⅰ开发了一种原始的方法来解决这个假设的问题:两栖动物准备小组的组成,在美国使用。尽管这是一个假设的决策情况,但这项工作使用了来自美国媒体的真实数据。我们使用Electre I是因为它是一种原生的超越多标准决策方法,旨在解决选择决策问题。此外,我们利用the Visual Outdeck web app (Outranking Decision and Knowledge app)的支持来实现模型和Electre I多准则算法,并对结果的权重和一致和不一致的截止水平进行敏感性分析。此外,我们将相同的输入数据应用于加性决策算法,允许对结果进行比较。因此,我们通过利用任务组配置中最佳地补充其他元素的元素来建立任务组的设置。此外,研究发现,该工作组不同于传统的加性建模应组成的工作组。本研究的主要贡献在于,它提供了一个强有力的讨论和原始模型,支持军事决策者在选择一组更好的军事特遣队时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pesquisa Operacional
Pesquisa Operacional Decision Sciences-Management Science and Operations Research
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pesquisa Operacional is published each semester by the Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Operacional - SOBRAPO, performing one volume per year, and is distributed free of charge to its associates. The abbreviated title of the journal is Pesq. Oper., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
STUDY FOR DECENTRALIZATION OF NAVAL POWER IN THE BRAZILIAN NAVY: STRUCTURING AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING IN THE LIGHT OF THE ELECTRE-MOR METHOD FUZZY-BASED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR PRIVATE BANKING RECOVERY OF A GREEN HOSPITAL SYSTEMS BASED ON ISO 14001: 2015 STANDARDS A NEW MODELLING FOR THE AIRCRAFT LANDING PROBLEM AND MATHEURISTIC APPROACH TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM WITH A LARGE NUMBER OF AIRCRAFT BI-LEVEL MODEL: NEW APPROACH TO DYNAMIC VEHICLE ALLOCATION IN SUPPLY CHAIN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1