Environmental Taxes in Poland and South Korea – Sharing Experiences

Magdalena Szymczak
{"title":"Environmental Taxes in Poland and South Korea – Sharing Experiences","authors":"Magdalena Szymczak","doi":"10.15611/pn.2023.3.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aimed to identify, to assess the environmental taxes in Poland and South Korea, and to indicate a potential area of cooperation – an exchange of experience on environmental taxes. The analysis covered data from the period 2000-2020. However, in some parts, due to the availability of data, the investigation was completed in 2014 or 2019. The research methods employed were a critical analysis of domestic and foreign literature, an analysis of Polish and Korean legal acts underpinning environmental taxes in a comparative approach, and an analysis of OECD data using simple statistical methods and benchmarking elements. Four environmental taxes were identified in Poland: an excise tax on types of products deemed harmful to the environment, a Vehicle Tax, a Forest Tax and an Agricultural Tax. In South Korea, three taxes were included: Individual Consumption Tax, Automobile Tax and Transportation, Energy, Environmental Tax. Environmental taxes in Poland and South Korea were evaluated positively, taking the fiscal and informative functions as criteria. However, it was shown that an exchange of experience would be desirable, particularly in the area of improving the implementation of the stimulating function of taxes that related to air pollution.","PeriodicalId":307844,"journal":{"name":"Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2023.3.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article aimed to identify, to assess the environmental taxes in Poland and South Korea, and to indicate a potential area of cooperation – an exchange of experience on environmental taxes. The analysis covered data from the period 2000-2020. However, in some parts, due to the availability of data, the investigation was completed in 2014 or 2019. The research methods employed were a critical analysis of domestic and foreign literature, an analysis of Polish and Korean legal acts underpinning environmental taxes in a comparative approach, and an analysis of OECD data using simple statistical methods and benchmarking elements. Four environmental taxes were identified in Poland: an excise tax on types of products deemed harmful to the environment, a Vehicle Tax, a Forest Tax and an Agricultural Tax. In South Korea, three taxes were included: Individual Consumption Tax, Automobile Tax and Transportation, Energy, Environmental Tax. Environmental taxes in Poland and South Korea were evaluated positively, taking the fiscal and informative functions as criteria. However, it was shown that an exchange of experience would be desirable, particularly in the area of improving the implementation of the stimulating function of taxes that related to air pollution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰和韩国的环境税——经验分享
这篇文章旨在确定和评估波兰和韩国的环境税,并指出一个潜在的合作领域,即交流环境税方面的经验。该分析涵盖了2000年至2020年期间的数据。然而,在某些地方,由于数据的可用性,调查在2014年或2019年完成。采用的研究方法是对国内外文献进行批判性分析,以比较方法对波兰和韩国的环境税法律行为进行分析,并使用简单的统计方法和基准要素对经合组织的数据进行分析。波兰确定了四种环境税:对被认为对环境有害的各种产品征收的消费税、车辆税、森林税和农业税。在韩国,包括三种税:个人消费税、汽车税和交通税、能源税、环境税。波兰和韩国的环境税以财政和信息功能为标准,得到了积极评价。但是,会议表明,交流经验是可取的,特别是在改进执行与空气污染有关的税收的刺激功能方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applications of Psychology in the Analysis of Consumer Behaviour – Selected Issues Współczesne koncepcje rozwoju miast – Wrocław jako miejsce tworzenia się ekosystemów przedsiębiorczości Zarządzanie odpadami w przedsiębiorstwie w erze zrównoważonego rozwoju – analiza przypadku spółki grupy Komandor Economic Environment in Latvia: Interaction of Ethical and Ethnic Values in Organizational Culture Psychologia ekonomiczna w Polsce. Czy ekonomiści potrzebują psychologów, a psycholodzy – ekonomistów?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1