Coparenting Questionnaire (CQ): Adaptation and Validity Evidences for Brazilian Context

Q3 Social Sciences Paideia Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1982-4327e3317
Amanda Porto Padilha, Giuliana Violeta Vásquez Varas, Juliane Callegaro Borsa
{"title":"Coparenting Questionnaire (CQ): Adaptation and Validity Evidences for Brazilian Context","authors":"Amanda Porto Padilha, Giuliana Violeta Vásquez Varas, Juliane Callegaro Borsa","doi":"10.1590/1982-4327e3317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Co-parenting is the reciprocal effort between two caregivers to raise a child and is important in the mental health of families. This study aims to describe the adaptation procedures and initial evidence of validity of the Co-parenting Questionnaire (CQ) for Brazil. The adaptation was carried out according to the stages: translation; synthesis of translated versions; evaluation by experts and target audience; and reverse translation. To assess its factorial structure, confirmatory factor analyzes were performed in multifactorial and bi-factorial models in a sample of 590 mothers/fathers aged 21 to 60 years (M = 36.24; SD = 5.88) residing in 21 states of Brazil. The CQ presented adequate adjustments for a correlated multifactorial solution and for the bifactor model. Complementary indices indicate that its multifactorial structure is the most adequate. Considering that 90% of the participants are women, the results show the CQ is a valid instrument for measuring co-parenting in Brazilian women.","PeriodicalId":38841,"journal":{"name":"Paideia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paideia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Co-parenting is the reciprocal effort between two caregivers to raise a child and is important in the mental health of families. This study aims to describe the adaptation procedures and initial evidence of validity of the Co-parenting Questionnaire (CQ) for Brazil. The adaptation was carried out according to the stages: translation; synthesis of translated versions; evaluation by experts and target audience; and reverse translation. To assess its factorial structure, confirmatory factor analyzes were performed in multifactorial and bi-factorial models in a sample of 590 mothers/fathers aged 21 to 60 years (M = 36.24; SD = 5.88) residing in 21 states of Brazil. The CQ presented adequate adjustments for a correlated multifactorial solution and for the bifactor model. Complementary indices indicate that its multifactorial structure is the most adequate. Considering that 90% of the participants are women, the results show the CQ is a valid instrument for measuring co-parenting in Brazilian women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母教养问卷(CQ):巴西情境下的适应与效度证据
共同抚养是两个照顾者在抚养孩子方面的相互努力,对家庭的心理健康至关重要。本研究旨在描述巴西共同养育问卷(CQ)的适应程序和效度的初步证据。改编分阶段进行:翻译;译文综合;专家和目标受众的评价;还有反向翻译。为了评估其因子结构,我们对590名21 ~ 60岁的母亲/父亲进行了多因子和双因子模型验证性因子分析(M = 36.24;SD = 5.88),居住在巴西21个州。CQ为相关的多因子解决方案和双因子模型提供了充分的调整。互补指标表明其多因子结构最为充分。考虑到90%的参与者是女性,结果表明CQ是衡量巴西女性共同抚养子女的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Paideia
Paideia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Substance Use Disorder Among Bereaved Individuals: A Systematic Review Morbidities, Self-reported Health, Purpose, and Satisfaction with Life in Older Adults Comparison of Female Body Image Between Models and Non-Models Women Evidence of Validity for the Hierarchical Job Crafting Scale in Brazil Children and Adolescents with Depression: Perception of Family Caregivers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1