Information Science Students’ Background and Data Science Competencies: An Exploratory Study

Ariel Rosenfeld, Avshalom Elmalech
{"title":"Information Science Students’ Background and Data Science Competencies: An Exploratory Study","authors":"Ariel Rosenfeld, Avshalom Elmalech","doi":"10.3138/jelis-2021-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many Library and Information Science (LIS) training programs are gradually expanding their curricula to include computational data science courses such as supervised and unsupervised machine learning. These programs focus on developing both “classic” information science competencies as well as core data science competencies among their students. Since data science competencies are often associated with mathematical and computational thinking, departmental officials and prospective students often raise concerns regarding the appropriate background students should have in order to succeed in this newly introduced computational content of the LIS training programs. In order to address these concerns, we report on an exploratory study through which we examined the 2020 and 2021 student classes of Bar-Ilan University's LIS graduate training, focusing on the computational data science courses (i.e., supervised and unsupervised machine learning). Our study shows that contrary to many of the concerns raised, students from the humanities performed as well (and in some cases significantly better) on data science competencies compared to those from the social sciences and had better success in the training program as a whole. In addition, students’ undergraduate GPA acted as an adequate indicator for both their success in the training program and in the data science part thereof. In addition, we find no evidence to support concerns regarding age or sex. Finally, our study suggests that the computational data science part of students’ training is very much aligned with the rest of their training program.","PeriodicalId":37587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis-2021-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many Library and Information Science (LIS) training programs are gradually expanding their curricula to include computational data science courses such as supervised and unsupervised machine learning. These programs focus on developing both “classic” information science competencies as well as core data science competencies among their students. Since data science competencies are often associated with mathematical and computational thinking, departmental officials and prospective students often raise concerns regarding the appropriate background students should have in order to succeed in this newly introduced computational content of the LIS training programs. In order to address these concerns, we report on an exploratory study through which we examined the 2020 and 2021 student classes of Bar-Ilan University's LIS graduate training, focusing on the computational data science courses (i.e., supervised and unsupervised machine learning). Our study shows that contrary to many of the concerns raised, students from the humanities performed as well (and in some cases significantly better) on data science competencies compared to those from the social sciences and had better success in the training program as a whole. In addition, students’ undergraduate GPA acted as an adequate indicator for both their success in the training program and in the data science part thereof. In addition, we find no evidence to support concerns regarding age or sex. Finally, our study suggests that the computational data science part of students’ training is very much aligned with the rest of their training program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息科学学生的背景与数据科学能力:一项探索性研究
许多图书馆和信息科学(LIS)培训项目正在逐步扩大他们的课程,包括计算数据科学课程,如监督和无监督机器学习。这些课程的重点是培养学生的“经典”信息科学能力和核心数据科学能力。由于数据科学能力通常与数学和计算思维有关,部门官员和未来的学生经常关注学生应该具备的适当背景,以便在LIS培训计划中新引入的计算内容中取得成功。为了解决这些问题,我们报告了一项探索性研究,通过该研究,我们检查了巴伊兰大学2020年和2021年LIS研究生培训的学生班级,重点关注计算数据科学课程(即监督和无监督机器学习)。我们的研究表明,与提出的许多担忧相反,与社会科学专业的学生相比,人文科学专业的学生在数据科学能力方面表现良好(在某些情况下明显更好),并且在整个培训计划中取得了更好的成功。此外,学生的本科GPA作为一个足够的指标来衡量他们在培训计划和数据科学部分的成功。此外,我们没有发现与年龄或性别有关的证据。最后,我们的研究表明,学生培训的计算数据科学部分与他们培训计划的其余部分非常一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education for Library and Information Science (JELIS) is a fully refereed scholarly periodical that has been published quarterly by the Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE) since 1960. JELIS supports scholarly inquiry in library and information science (LIS) education by serving as the primary venue for the publication of research articles, reviews, and brief communications about issues of interest to LIS educators.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Post-Graduate Curricula for Emerging Professionals: A Case Study of the National Library of Medicine's Associate Fellowship Program Metadata for Digital Collections Fundamentals for the Instruction Coordinator Young Adult Literature: From Romance to Realism, Fourth Edition Creating a School Library with Impact: A Beginner's Guide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1