Human-Rights Approach to Water in the European Union on the 10th Anniversary of the ‘Right2Water’ Initiative

Olga Hałub-Kowalczyk
{"title":"Human-Rights Approach to Water in the European Union on the 10th Anniversary of the ‘Right2Water’ Initiative","authors":"Olga Hałub-Kowalczyk","doi":"10.15804/ppsy202339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 20 principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights adopted by the EU in 2017 include the right to access such basic services as water, sanitation, energy or transport. In the face of the climate crisis, the first of these rights is becoming a service which, due to the progression of global warming, could lose its universal and easily accessible nature. It seems reasonable to ask about the chances of developing a ‘right to water’ within the framework of the EU’s system, which would unambiguously oblige the public authorities to ensure access to this right. The trigger for this research was the ‘Right2Water’ European citizens’ initiative addressed to the European Commission in 2013, which contained postulates to recognise access to water as a human right. Ten years after the launch of this procedure, it is reasonable to acknowledge the verification of the actions taken by the EU and whether the evolving EU water policy can be assessed as being oriented towards ensuring the right to water for all EU-inhabitants. The aim of this paper justifies the use of legal-dogmatic research methodology. Regarding the analysis of legal acts, the rules of legal hermeneutics were applied, esp. grammar and teleological interpretation.","PeriodicalId":32104,"journal":{"name":"Polish Political Science Yearbook","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Political Science Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 20 principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights adopted by the EU in 2017 include the right to access such basic services as water, sanitation, energy or transport. In the face of the climate crisis, the first of these rights is becoming a service which, due to the progression of global warming, could lose its universal and easily accessible nature. It seems reasonable to ask about the chances of developing a ‘right to water’ within the framework of the EU’s system, which would unambiguously oblige the public authorities to ensure access to this right. The trigger for this research was the ‘Right2Water’ European citizens’ initiative addressed to the European Commission in 2013, which contained postulates to recognise access to water as a human right. Ten years after the launch of this procedure, it is reasonable to acknowledge the verification of the actions taken by the EU and whether the evolving EU water policy can be assessed as being oriented towards ensuring the right to water for all EU-inhabitants. The aim of this paper justifies the use of legal-dogmatic research methodology. Regarding the analysis of legal acts, the rules of legal hermeneutics were applied, esp. grammar and teleological interpretation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在“水权”倡议十周年之际,欧盟对水的人权态度
欧盟于2017年通过的欧洲社会权利支柱的20项原则包括获得水、卫生设施、能源或交通等基本服务的权利。面对气候危机,这些权利中的第一项正在成为一项服务,由于全球变暖的进展,它可能失去其普遍和容易获得的性质。在欧盟体系框架内发展“水权”的可能性似乎是合理的,这将明确要求公共当局确保获得这一权利。这项研究的导火索是2013年向欧盟委员会提出的“水权”欧洲公民倡议,其中包括承认获得水是一项人权的假设。在这一程序启动十年后,我们有理由承认欧盟所采取的行动得到了验证,以及欧盟不断发展的水政策是否可以被评估为旨在确保所有欧盟居民的水权。本文的目的是证明使用法律教条主义的研究方法是合理的。在对法律行为的分析中,运用了法律解释学的规则,特别是语法解释和目的论解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Union Civil Protection Mechanism as an International Policy Tool Supporting Ukraine Chinese Soft Power Drugs and State Vigilantism as a Strategy of Political Activity: The Example of Thailand, the Philippines, and Indonesia New Perspectives on the Use of Satellite Information in Contemporary Armed Conflicts and Crisis Management Pact of Free Cities – A New Form of European Cities’ Cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1