Anti-Racism and Releasement in advance

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Philosophy Today Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5840/philtoday2023926501
Eyo Ewara
{"title":"Anti-Racism and Releasement in advance","authors":"Eyo Ewara","doi":"10.5840/philtoday2023926501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the selective uptake of Martin Heidegger’s work in critical philosophy of race and in black studies. While scholars have drawn from Heidegger’s thinking on technology to offer accounts of the technological production of race in general and of blackness in particular, few have engaged with Heidegger’s response to technology: his discussions of Gelassenheit or “releasement.” This paper analyzes this avoidance of Gelassenheit, arguing that its interpretation as passivity points to broader anxieties about the need to act that are symptomatic of Heidegger’s account of technology itself. These anxieties lead to a potentially damaging tacit prioritization of action at the expense of thought, and a reduction of black people to their value as actors or workers, even among thinkers like Saidiya Hartman who valorize a resistant waywardness.","PeriodicalId":20142,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy Today","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2023926501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the selective uptake of Martin Heidegger’s work in critical philosophy of race and in black studies. While scholars have drawn from Heidegger’s thinking on technology to offer accounts of the technological production of race in general and of blackness in particular, few have engaged with Heidegger’s response to technology: his discussions of Gelassenheit or “releasement.” This paper analyzes this avoidance of Gelassenheit, arguing that its interpretation as passivity points to broader anxieties about the need to act that are symptomatic of Heidegger’s account of technology itself. These anxieties lead to a potentially damaging tacit prioritization of action at the expense of thought, and a reduction of black people to their value as actors or workers, even among thinkers like Saidiya Hartman who valorize a resistant waywardness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反种族主义和提前释放
本文探讨了马丁·海德格尔的作品在种族批判哲学和黑人研究中的选择性吸收。虽然学者们从海德格尔对技术的思考中得出结论,提供了对种族,特别是黑人的技术生产的描述,但很少有人参与海德格尔对技术的回应:他对Gelassenheit或“释放”的讨论。本文分析了这种对Gelassenheit的回避,认为其作为被动性的解释指出了对行动需要的更广泛的焦虑,这是海德格尔对技术本身的描述的症状。这些焦虑导致了一种潜在的破坏性的隐性优先行动,以牺牲思想为代价,并降低了黑人作为演员或工人的价值,即使在像赛迪亚·哈特曼(Saidiya Hartman)这样崇尚反抗任性的思想家中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophy Today
Philosophy Today PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Internal Colonialism and Democracy in advance “Just the Same Fascism for Us” in advance Violence, Democracy, and Selective Recognition in advance What Is “Totalitarian” Today? in advance The Anti-Vaxxer as a Moral Equal in advance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1