The Curse of Manhood: Reflections on Male-Bashing in Radical Separatist Feminist African Literature

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN Research in African Literatures Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2979/reseafrilite.53.4.04
Kelvin Acheampong
{"title":"The Curse of Manhood: Reflections on Male-Bashing in Radical Separatist Feminist African Literature","authors":"Kelvin Acheampong","doi":"10.2979/reseafrilite.53.4.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: Feminism represents the battle for equal access to opportunities in society for males and females and, therefore, a necessary struggle for social justice. It is sometimes the case, however, that feminism degenerates into a battle against men, a tendency Mawuli Adzei refers to as “radical separatist feminism” (47). In African literature, this standpoint is reflected in the abject degradation of male characters, who are usually presented as the oppressors of women, enemies of women, barriers to women’s progress, and only without whom women would be able to achieve their highest potentials in society (Adzei 47). Against this backdrop, and using El Saadawi’s Woman at Point Zero as a primary text, this paper, while acknowledging the validity and necessity of the crusade for gender equity in African societies, contests the logic fueling male-bashing by foregrounding certain often-ignored variables in this debate: first, the faulty homogenization/essentialization of men and women (and by extension, the neglection of intersectionality) and, second, the constraints certain cultural expectations pose to men. I conclude by highlighting Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s point that—because feminism is potentially liberating for both women and men—we can all be feminists.","PeriodicalId":21021,"journal":{"name":"Research in African Literatures","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in African Literatures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/reseafrilite.53.4.04","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Feminism represents the battle for equal access to opportunities in society for males and females and, therefore, a necessary struggle for social justice. It is sometimes the case, however, that feminism degenerates into a battle against men, a tendency Mawuli Adzei refers to as “radical separatist feminism” (47). In African literature, this standpoint is reflected in the abject degradation of male characters, who are usually presented as the oppressors of women, enemies of women, barriers to women’s progress, and only without whom women would be able to achieve their highest potentials in society (Adzei 47). Against this backdrop, and using El Saadawi’s Woman at Point Zero as a primary text, this paper, while acknowledging the validity and necessity of the crusade for gender equity in African societies, contests the logic fueling male-bashing by foregrounding certain often-ignored variables in this debate: first, the faulty homogenization/essentialization of men and women (and by extension, the neglection of intersectionality) and, second, the constraints certain cultural expectations pose to men. I conclude by highlighting Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s point that—because feminism is potentially liberating for both women and men—we can all be feminists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男子气概的诅咒:对激进分离主义女性主义非洲文学中对男性的抨击的反思
摘要:女权主义代表着男女在社会中争取平等机会的斗争,因此也是争取社会正义的必要斗争。然而,女权主义有时也会退化为一场反对男性的斗争,Mawuli Adzei将这种趋势称为“激进的分离主义女权主义”(47)。在非洲文学中,这种观点反映在男性角色的卑贱堕落上,他们通常被描绘成女性的压迫者、女性的敌人、女性进步的障碍,只有没有他们,女性才能在社会中发挥最大的潜力(Adzei 47)。在此背景下,本文以萨达维的《零点的女人》为主要文本,在承认非洲社会性别平等运动的有效性和必要性的同时,通过强调这场辩论中某些经常被忽视的变量,对助长男性抨击的逻辑提出质疑:首先,男性和女性的错误同质化/本质化(以及由此延伸,对交叉性的忽视),其次,某些文化期望对男性的限制。最后,我强调了Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie的观点——因为女权主义对女性和男性都有潜在的解放作用——我们都可以成为女权主义者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in African Literatures
Research in African Literatures LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1970, Research in African Literatures is the premier journal of African literary studies worldwide and provides a forum in English for research on the oral and written literatures of Africa, as well as information on African publishing, announcements of importance to Africanists, and notes and queries of literary interest. Reviews of current scholarly books are included in every issue, often presented as review essays, and a forum offers readers the opportunity to respond to issues raised in articles and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Intertextual Moments, Contested Meanings: Kitula King'ei's Adaptation and Rewriting of Utendi wa Mwana Kupona Nature on Trial: Probing Cosmic Warfare in Akwanya's Pilgrim Foot and Leopardi's "Dialogue between Nature and an Icelander" Collaborative Conversations: Celebrating Twenty-One Years of the Mothertongue Project ed. by Alex Halligey and Sara Matchett (review) Messianic Failure: Angolan Literature, Magical Realism, and the Form of Critique Hustler Masculinity in the Nigerian E-fraud Novel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1