Harnessing welfare state theories to explain the emergence of eco-social policies

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION European Journal of Social Security Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1177/13882627231205759
Matteo Mandelli
{"title":"Harnessing welfare state theories to explain the emergence of eco-social policies","authors":"Matteo Mandelli","doi":"10.1177/13882627231205759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As complex challenges such as climate change and social inequality become more and more politically salient, eco-social policies are emerging as suitable public policy tools to pursue integrated environmental and social objectives. In spite of this, the sustainable welfare literature has been, at least until now, dominated by prescriptive studies, paying little attention to the politico-institutional conditions required for these policies to emerge. Against this background, this article aims to help filling this gap, by proposing a set of four theoretical expectations pointing to possible causal drivers and mechanisms behind the adoption of this particular kind of policies. It does so by harnessing the most established welfare state theories and reflecting on their potential and limitations when applied to the study of eco-social policies. Selected theoretical strands – functionalism, historical institutionalism, interest-based and ideas-based theories – are first reviewed and then applied to the specific object of the study, with a view to deriving the four expectations by deduction. The ultimate aim is to generate a politico-institutional theory of eco-social policies, which can guide future empirical research. The article argues that eco-social policies can be expected to emerge in strong environmental states and/or in weak welfare states, in which equally powerful labour and green interests engage in political exchanges, or where advocacy coalitions form around ambiguous ideas, such as ‘just transition’. The article concludes by arguing that only an actor-centred approach based on empirically observable policy preferences can help us to craft minimally sufficient causal inferences about the emergence of eco-social policies.","PeriodicalId":44670,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Security","volume":"239 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627231205759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As complex challenges such as climate change and social inequality become more and more politically salient, eco-social policies are emerging as suitable public policy tools to pursue integrated environmental and social objectives. In spite of this, the sustainable welfare literature has been, at least until now, dominated by prescriptive studies, paying little attention to the politico-institutional conditions required for these policies to emerge. Against this background, this article aims to help filling this gap, by proposing a set of four theoretical expectations pointing to possible causal drivers and mechanisms behind the adoption of this particular kind of policies. It does so by harnessing the most established welfare state theories and reflecting on their potential and limitations when applied to the study of eco-social policies. Selected theoretical strands – functionalism, historical institutionalism, interest-based and ideas-based theories – are first reviewed and then applied to the specific object of the study, with a view to deriving the four expectations by deduction. The ultimate aim is to generate a politico-institutional theory of eco-social policies, which can guide future empirical research. The article argues that eco-social policies can be expected to emerge in strong environmental states and/or in weak welfare states, in which equally powerful labour and green interests engage in political exchanges, or where advocacy coalitions form around ambiguous ideas, such as ‘just transition’. The article concludes by arguing that only an actor-centred approach based on empirically observable policy preferences can help us to craft minimally sufficient causal inferences about the emergence of eco-social policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用福利国家理论来解释生态社会政策的出现
随着气候变化和社会不平等等复杂挑战在政治上变得越来越突出,生态社会政策正成为追求综合环境和社会目标的合适公共政策工具。尽管如此,至少到目前为止,可持续福利的文献一直以规范性研究为主,很少注意这些政策出现所需的政治制度条件。在这种背景下,本文旨在通过提出一套四种理论期望,指出采用这种特殊政策背后可能的因果驱动因素和机制,来帮助填补这一空白。它通过利用最成熟的福利国家理论,并反思它们在应用于生态社会政策研究时的潜力和局限性来做到这一点。首先对选定的理论流派——功能主义理论、历史制度主义理论、利益基础理论和理念基础理论——进行了回顾,然后将其应用于具体的研究对象,以期通过推演得出这四种期望。最终目的是建立一个生态社会政策的政治制度理论,以指导未来的实证研究。这篇文章认为,生态社会政策可以在强大的环境国家和/或弱势的福利国家出现,在这些国家中,同样强大的劳工和绿色利益参与政治交流,或者围绕“公正过渡”等模糊的想法形成倡导联盟。文章的结论是,只有基于经验观察到的政策偏好的以行为者为中心的方法,才能帮助我们对生态社会政策的出现做出充分的因果推论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Social Security
European Journal of Social Security PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Book Review: The Quantified Worker. Law and Technology in the Modern Workplace by Ifeoma Ajunwa An Effective protection against unemployment for self-employed and platform workers? The intriguing case of Denmark Exploring unemployment insurance for the self-employed and platform workers: How to navigate difficult waters? A comparative, conceptual and European perspective The rights to social security and social assistance in the European Social Charter: Towards a positive content…but what sort of content? Reaching the European 2030 poverty target: The imperative to balance the EU social agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1