Higher Education Accommodation Decision-Making and Positionality: A Survey of Disability Resource Professionals

Morgan Strimel, Grace Francis, Jodi Duke
{"title":"Higher Education Accommodation Decision-Making and Positionality: A Survey of Disability Resource Professionals","authors":"Morgan Strimel, Grace Francis, Jodi Duke","doi":"10.33009/fsop_jpss132666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In higher education settings, the central function of a disability resource professional (DRP) is determining accommodations in collaboration with disabled college students, making their role in the outcomes of students with disabilities paramount. Despite this importance, research on the process of determining accommodations is minimal, and professional guidance on the matter can be interpreted in varied ways, leading DRPs to rely on their professional judgment to reach final decisions. What subtly informs this professional judgment, particularly concerning DRPs’ positionalities and student identities, is largely unexplored. The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of U.S. DRPs related to their accommodation decision-making processes, experiences, and perceptions. Based on the results of this exploratory national survey of DRPs, accommodation decision-making processes described by participants can be divided into four components: (a) forming initial opinions, (b) engaging with students, (c) consulting with others, and (d) making final decisions. Notably, participants’ perceptions of positionality and identities in the accommodations process situated those of students to be more heavily considered than their own. Following a presentation of findings, the authors conclude with implications for the field and recommendations for future research.","PeriodicalId":477179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of postsecondary student success","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of postsecondary student success","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33009/fsop_jpss132666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In higher education settings, the central function of a disability resource professional (DRP) is determining accommodations in collaboration with disabled college students, making their role in the outcomes of students with disabilities paramount. Despite this importance, research on the process of determining accommodations is minimal, and professional guidance on the matter can be interpreted in varied ways, leading DRPs to rely on their professional judgment to reach final decisions. What subtly informs this professional judgment, particularly concerning DRPs’ positionalities and student identities, is largely unexplored. The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of U.S. DRPs related to their accommodation decision-making processes, experiences, and perceptions. Based on the results of this exploratory national survey of DRPs, accommodation decision-making processes described by participants can be divided into four components: (a) forming initial opinions, (b) engaging with students, (c) consulting with others, and (d) making final decisions. Notably, participants’ perceptions of positionality and identities in the accommodations process situated those of students to be more heavily considered than their own. Following a presentation of findings, the authors conclude with implications for the field and recommendations for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育住宿决策与定位:残障资源专业人员调查
在高等教育环境中,残疾资源专业人员(DRP)的核心职能是与残疾大学生合作确定住宿条件,使他们在残疾学生的成果中发挥重要作用。尽管这一点很重要,但关于决定住宿的过程的研究很少,而且在这个问题上的专业指导可以用不同的方式来解释,这导致drp依靠他们的专业判断来做出最终决定。是什么微妙地影响了这种专业判断,特别是关于drp的职位和学生身份,在很大程度上没有被探索。本研究的目的是探讨美国难民在住宿决策过程、经验和观念方面的观点。根据这项探索性全国DRPs调查的结果,参与者描述的住宿决策过程可以分为四个部分:(a)形成初步意见,(b)与学生接触,(c)与其他人协商,(d)做出最终决定。值得注意的是,在住宿过程中,参与者对位置和身份的看法使学生的观点比他们自己的观点更受重视。在介绍了研究结果之后,作者总结了对该领域的影响和对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“To Make this Leap”: Understanding Relationships that Support Community College Students’ Transfer Journeys Test-Optional Policies: Impacts to Date and Recommendations for Equity in Admissions Quality of Student–Faculty Interactions, Persistence, and the Mediating Role of Student Satisfaction Academic Learning Experiences and Challenges of Students With Disabilities in Higher Education Campus Support Program Service Use by Students Who Experienced Foster Care, Relative Care, or Homelessness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1