Tenapanor in Chinese patients with ESRD on haemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia: a randomised, Phase 3 trial

NDT Plus Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfad216
Liangying Gan, Li Xing, Yan Xu, Linghui Zhou, Hong Jiang, Xiuli Sun, Tianjun Guan, Ping Luo, Junxia Wang, Fuyun Sun, Zhiyong Guo, Minghao Guo, Ju Gao, Gang Wei, Wen Zhong, Yongchun Zhou, Li Zuo
{"title":"Tenapanor in Chinese patients with ESRD on haemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia: a randomised, Phase 3 trial","authors":"Liangying Gan, Li Xing, Yan Xu, Linghui Zhou, Hong Jiang, Xiuli Sun, Tianjun Guan, Ping Luo, Junxia Wang, Fuyun Sun, Zhiyong Guo, Minghao Guo, Ju Gao, Gang Wei, Wen Zhong, Yongchun Zhou, Li Zuo","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfad216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background The efficacy and safety of tenapanor has not been confirmed in Chinese end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with hyperphosphatemia on haemodialysis (HD). Methods This was a randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial conducted at 26 dialysis facilities in China (https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx; CTR20202588). After a 3-week washout, adults with ESRD on HD with hyperphosphatemia were randomised (1:1) using an interactive web response system to oral tenapanor 30 mg twice a day or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in mean serum phosphorous level from baseline to the endpoint visit (day 29 or last serum phosphorus measurement). Efficacy was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. Results Between 5 March 2021 and 8 June 2022, 77 patients received tenapanor and 73 received placebo. Tenapanor treatment (n = 75) resulted in a significantly greater least squares (LS) mean reduction in serum phosphate at the endpoint visit versus placebo (n = 72): LS mean difference −1.17 mg/dl (95% CI −1.694 to −0.654, P < .001). More patients receiving tenapanor achieved a serum phosphorous level <5.5 mg/dl at the endpoint visit (44.6% versus 10.1%). The most common treatment-related adverse event was diarrhoea [tenapanor 28.6% (22/77), placebo 2.7% (2/73)], which was mostly mild and led to treatment discontinuation in two patients receiving tenapanor. Conclusions Tenapanor significantly reduced the serum phosphorous level versus placebo in Chinese ESRD patients on HD and was generally well tolerated.","PeriodicalId":18987,"journal":{"name":"NDT Plus","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NDT Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The efficacy and safety of tenapanor has not been confirmed in Chinese end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with hyperphosphatemia on haemodialysis (HD). Methods This was a randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial conducted at 26 dialysis facilities in China (https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx; CTR20202588). After a 3-week washout, adults with ESRD on HD with hyperphosphatemia were randomised (1:1) using an interactive web response system to oral tenapanor 30 mg twice a day or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in mean serum phosphorous level from baseline to the endpoint visit (day 29 or last serum phosphorus measurement). Efficacy was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. Results Between 5 March 2021 and 8 June 2022, 77 patients received tenapanor and 73 received placebo. Tenapanor treatment (n = 75) resulted in a significantly greater least squares (LS) mean reduction in serum phosphate at the endpoint visit versus placebo (n = 72): LS mean difference −1.17 mg/dl (95% CI −1.694 to −0.654, P < .001). More patients receiving tenapanor achieved a serum phosphorous level <5.5 mg/dl at the endpoint visit (44.6% versus 10.1%). The most common treatment-related adverse event was diarrhoea [tenapanor 28.6% (22/77), placebo 2.7% (2/73)], which was mostly mild and led to treatment discontinuation in two patients receiving tenapanor. Conclusions Tenapanor significantly reduced the serum phosphorous level versus placebo in Chinese ESRD patients on HD and was generally well tolerated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tenapanor在中国ESRD血液透析伴高磷血症患者中的应用:一项随机3期试验
背景:在中国终末期肾病(ESRD)血液透析(HD)患者中,替那帕诺的有效性和安全性尚未得到证实。这是一项随机、双盲、3期试验,在中国26家透析机构进行(https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx;CTR20202588)。在3周的洗脱期后,成人ESRD伴高磷血症的HD患者被随机分配(1:1),使用交互式网络反应系统,每天两次口服tenapanor 30 mg或安慰剂,持续4周。主要终点是平均血清磷水平从基线到终点访问(第29天或最后一次血清磷测量)的变化。在意向治疗人群中分析疗效。对所有接受至少一剂研究药物的患者进行安全性评估。在2021年3月5日至2022年6月8日期间,77名患者接受了tenapanor治疗,73名患者接受了安慰剂治疗。与安慰剂(n = 72)相比,Tenapanor治疗(n = 75)在终点访问时导致了更大的最小二乘(LS)平均血清磷酸盐降低:LS平均差异为- 1.17 mg/dl (95% CI为- 1.694至- 0.654,P <措施)。更多接受tenapanor治疗的患者在终点随访时达到了5.5 mg/dl的血清磷水平(44.6%对10.1%)。最常见的治疗相关不良事件是腹泻[tenapanor 28.6%(22/77),安慰剂2.7%(2/73)],大多数是轻微的,并导致两名接受tenapanor治疗的患者停止治疗。结论:与安慰剂相比,Tenapanor显著降低了中国ESRD HD患者的血清磷水平,并且总体耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sleep apnea syndrome prevalence in chronic kidney disease and end stage kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mechanisms and treatment of Obesity-Related Hypertension: Part 1. Mechanisms Twenty years of the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network Replacing a kidney biopsy by exome sequencing in undetermined kidney diseases – not yet ready for prime time! Kidney and urine cell transcriptomics in IgA nephropathy and lupus nephritis: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1