Safety and efficacy of Placida® (fixed dose combination of flupentixol 0.5 mg and melitracen 10 mg) in comparison to escitalopram 10 mg and clonazepam 0.5 mg in patients with comorbid anxiety and depression: a randomized, double blind, double dummy, parallel group clinical trial

Sunil S. Iyer, Rajat Singal, Sandip Mitra, Muneeb Ahsan, Paridhi Mathur, Rakesh Jain
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of Placida® (fixed dose combination of flupentixol 0.5 mg and melitracen 10 mg) in comparison to escitalopram 10 mg and clonazepam 0.5 mg in patients with comorbid anxiety and depression: a randomized, double blind, double dummy, parallel group clinical trial","authors":"Sunil S. Iyer, Rajat Singal, Sandip Mitra, Muneeb Ahsan, Paridhi Mathur, Rakesh Jain","doi":"10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20232501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) commonly present with comorbid anxiety and have greater depressive illness severity and chronicity, more suicide attempts, and completions. This randomized, double blind, double dummy, parallel-group clinical phase IV trial (CTRI/2022/11/047050) is aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of Placida® (FDC of flupentixol 0.5 mg + melitracen 10 mg) versus escitalopram + clonazepam in patients with comorbid anxiety and depression. Methods: This is a randomized, controlled, double blind, double dummy, parallel-group, phase IV trial. A total of 440 patients was enrolled across 11 sites in India who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All the subjects will be followed up for 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks with a buffer period of 1 week in each visit. The patient will be checked for severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Efficacy will be assessed using the Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D), Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAM-A) at baseline, weeks 4, 8 and 16, 24 score-reduction rate from baseline to end of treatment and extrapyramidal symptom rating scale (ESRS) at week 16 and end of the study. The first enrolment was done on 26 November 2022 and presently the subjects are under follow-up stage. The anticipated completion date for the study is March 2024. Conclusions: Outcomes of this trial will provide valuable information on safety and efficacy of Placida® as compared to escitalopram and clonazepam in treating patients with comorbid anxiety and depression. Trial Registration: The trial is registered with clinical trial registry India (CTRI/2022/11/047050) prospectively.","PeriodicalId":13787,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Trials","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20232501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) commonly present with comorbid anxiety and have greater depressive illness severity and chronicity, more suicide attempts, and completions. This randomized, double blind, double dummy, parallel-group clinical phase IV trial (CTRI/2022/11/047050) is aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of Placida® (FDC of flupentixol 0.5 mg + melitracen 10 mg) versus escitalopram + clonazepam in patients with comorbid anxiety and depression. Methods: This is a randomized, controlled, double blind, double dummy, parallel-group, phase IV trial. A total of 440 patients was enrolled across 11 sites in India who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All the subjects will be followed up for 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks with a buffer period of 1 week in each visit. The patient will be checked for severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Efficacy will be assessed using the Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D), Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAM-A) at baseline, weeks 4, 8 and 16, 24 score-reduction rate from baseline to end of treatment and extrapyramidal symptom rating scale (ESRS) at week 16 and end of the study. The first enrolment was done on 26 November 2022 and presently the subjects are under follow-up stage. The anticipated completion date for the study is March 2024. Conclusions: Outcomes of this trial will provide valuable information on safety and efficacy of Placida® as compared to escitalopram and clonazepam in treating patients with comorbid anxiety and depression. Trial Registration: The trial is registered with clinical trial registry India (CTRI/2022/11/047050) prospectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普拉西达®(氟哌噻索0.5 mg和美利曲辛10 mg的固定剂量组合)与艾司西酞普兰10 mg和氯硝西泮0.5 mg在共病焦虑和抑郁患者中的安全性和有效性:一项随机、双盲、双虚拟、平行组临床试验
背景:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者通常伴有共病性焦虑,抑郁症的严重程度和慢性程度更高,自杀企图和自杀未遂率更高。这项随机、双盲、双虚拟、平行组临床IV期试验(CTRI/2022/11/047050)旨在比较Placida®(氟哌噻索0.5 mg +美利曲辛10 mg的FDC)与艾司西酞普兰+氯硝西泮治疗伴发焦虑和抑郁患者的安全性和有效性。方法:这是一项随机、对照、双盲、双假、平行组、IV期试验。在印度的11个地点共纳入了440名符合纳入和排除标准的患者。所有受试者将被随访2、4、6、8、10、12、16、20和24周,每次随访有1周的缓冲期。将检查患者不良事件的严重程度(ae)和严重不良事件(sae)。在基线、第4周、第8周和第16周使用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)、汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAM-A)评估疗效,在基线至治疗结束时使用评分降低率,在第16周和研究结束时使用锥体外系症状评定量表(ESRS)评估疗效。第一次登记于2022年11月26日完成,目前受试者处于随访阶段。该研究预计完成日期为2024年3月。结论:本试验的结果将提供关于Placida®与艾司西酞普兰和氯硝西泮治疗共病性焦虑和抑郁患者的安全性和有效性的宝贵信息。试验注册:该试验已在印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI/2022/11/047050)进行前瞻性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of video feedback intervention on mother-infant interactional quality for women with perinatal mental health illnesses: protocol for a pilot randomised control trial Perioperative management of hyperglycemic patients undergoing surgery: an observational cross sectional study in a tertiary care hospital Perception of decentralized clinical trials and home nursing in oncology clinical research: insights from a survey of clinical research professionals across experimental sites A randomized clinical study comparing Trupler skin stapler and Trulon polyamide suture in post-surgical skin closure during orthopaedic and open abdominal surgeries Immediate effects of bandha hasta utthanasana on cerebral hemodynamics in healthy individuals: a protocol for randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1