Detection of antibacterial activity in chicken meat, eggs, drinking water, animal feed and sewage waste in Tabanan, Bali

Marta Setiabudy, Anak Agung Gede Indraningrat, Putu Arya Suryanditha, Ni Nyoman Sri Budayanti, Ni Komang Semara Yanti, I Ketut Agus Indra Adhiputra, I Gusti Ayu Rai Widowati, Kadek Karang Agustina
{"title":"Detection of antibacterial activity in chicken meat, eggs, drinking water, animal feed and sewage waste in Tabanan, Bali","authors":"Marta Setiabudy, Anak Agung Gede Indraningrat, Putu Arya Suryanditha, Ni Nyoman Sri Budayanti, Ni Komang Semara Yanti, I Ketut Agus Indra Adhiputra, I Gusti Ayu Rai Widowati, Kadek Karang Agustina","doi":"10.51559/jcmid.v3i1.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of antibiotics that are not in accordance with the indications, doses, and duration can trigger resistance and there is concern that it might leave antibiotic residues in the processed product. Aim of this study was to detect the antibacterial activity of livestock products, namely chicken meat and eggs and the surrounding environment such as drinking water, animal feed and waste disposal. This study was a preliminary study before the establishment of antibiotic wise village, One Health approach for antimicrobial stewardship program. Methods: This study was a descriptive study with a cross sectional design to determine antibacterial activity, particularly tetracycline in livestock products and the environment. The research samples were taken from 5 groups of farmers in one of the villages in Tabanan, Bali. Bioassay method based on the Kirby Bauer method was used in this study. Results: From a total of 44 samples, 6 samples showed weak antibiotic tetracycline activity (13.6%), namely in waste disposal (20%) and animal feed (40%). Antibiotic contamination was likely to occur because the animal feed used in this group contains antibiotics with or without the knowledge of the farmers themselves. Disposal waste came from livestock manure that ate the feed or from animal feed that was scattered around the cage. Conclusion: Samples of livestock meat and eggs did not show antibacterial activity. There were samples that have antibiotic activity but weak and inconsistent, namely in samples of waste disposal and animal feed. This condition cannot necessarily be concluded as antibiotic abuse in livestock however it can be the basis for the importance of providing education regarding antimicrobial resistance. Unless there was indication, antibiotics should not be given to livestock on a daily basis.","PeriodicalId":11964,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51559/jcmid.v3i1.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of antibiotics that are not in accordance with the indications, doses, and duration can trigger resistance and there is concern that it might leave antibiotic residues in the processed product. Aim of this study was to detect the antibacterial activity of livestock products, namely chicken meat and eggs and the surrounding environment such as drinking water, animal feed and waste disposal. This study was a preliminary study before the establishment of antibiotic wise village, One Health approach for antimicrobial stewardship program. Methods: This study was a descriptive study with a cross sectional design to determine antibacterial activity, particularly tetracycline in livestock products and the environment. The research samples were taken from 5 groups of farmers in one of the villages in Tabanan, Bali. Bioassay method based on the Kirby Bauer method was used in this study. Results: From a total of 44 samples, 6 samples showed weak antibiotic tetracycline activity (13.6%), namely in waste disposal (20%) and animal feed (40%). Antibiotic contamination was likely to occur because the animal feed used in this group contains antibiotics with or without the knowledge of the farmers themselves. Disposal waste came from livestock manure that ate the feed or from animal feed that was scattered around the cage. Conclusion: Samples of livestock meat and eggs did not show antibacterial activity. There were samples that have antibiotic activity but weak and inconsistent, namely in samples of waste disposal and animal feed. This condition cannot necessarily be concluded as antibiotic abuse in livestock however it can be the basis for the importance of providing education regarding antimicrobial resistance. Unless there was indication, antibiotics should not be given to livestock on a daily basis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴厘塔巴南地区鸡肉、鸡蛋、饮用水、动物饲料和污水中的抗菌活性检测
背景:使用不符合适应症、剂量和持续时间的抗生素可引发耐药性,并可能在加工产品中留下抗生素残留。本研究的目的是检测畜产品(即鸡肉和鸡蛋)及其周围环境(如饮用水、动物饲料和废物处理)的抗菌活性。本研究是建立“抗生素智慧村,同一个健康”抗菌素管理方案前的初步研究。方法:本研究采用横断面设计的描述性研究,以确定抗菌活性,特别是四环素在畜产品和环境中的抗菌活性。研究样本取自巴厘岛塔巴南一个村庄的5组农民。本研究采用Kirby Bauer法进行生物测定。结果:44份样本中,有6份样本四环素活性较弱(13.6%),分别为废弃物处理(20%)和动物饲料(40%)。抗生素污染很可能发生,因为这组动物饲料中含有抗生素,无论农民自己是否知情。处理废物来自吃了饲料的牲畜粪便或散落在笼子周围的动物饲料。结论:禽肉和禽蛋样品不具有抗菌活性。有一些样品具有抗生素活性,但较弱且不一致,即在废物处理和动物饲料样品中。这种情况不能必然归结为牲畜抗生素滥用,但它可以作为提供抗微生物药物耐药性教育的重要性的基础。除非有指示,否则不应每天给牲畜服用抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of 28-Day Mortality Between Hospital- and Community-Acquired Influenza Patients Long-Term Symptoms and Quality of Life in Persons with COVID-19 B Cell Subtypes in Individuals Received mRNA or Inactivated Vaccine Boosters After Fully Vaccinated with CoronaVac: A Longitudinal Study Centenary of the Republic and 90th Anniversary of the University Reform in Türkiye COVID-19: An Update on Epidemiology, Prevention and Treatment, September-2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1