National Conservatism, Fusionism, and the Legacy of the American Founding

Casey J. Wheatland
{"title":"National Conservatism, Fusionism, and the Legacy of the American Founding","authors":"Casey J. Wheatland","doi":"10.5840/cssr20232811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opposing conservative camps often claim the American Founding as their own. This leads to confusion amongst conservatives: What exactly does the American Founding mean for today’s politics? This article examines this question by focusing on the policy consensus of the Founders on the issues of foreign policy, trade, and immigration, three issues that currently divide the conservative movement. National conservatives are far closer than their opponents to early American policy on these issues.","PeriodicalId":348926,"journal":{"name":"The Catholic Social Science Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Catholic Social Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/cssr20232811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Opposing conservative camps often claim the American Founding as their own. This leads to confusion amongst conservatives: What exactly does the American Founding mean for today’s politics? This article examines this question by focusing on the policy consensus of the Founders on the issues of foreign policy, trade, and immigration, three issues that currently divide the conservative movement. National conservatives are far closer than their opponents to early American policy on these issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家保守主义、融合主义和美国建国的遗产
对立的保守派阵营经常声称美国的建国是他们自己的。这导致了保守派的困惑:美国建国对今天的政治到底意味着什么?本文通过关注开国元勋们在外交政策、贸易和移民问题上的政策共识来探讨这个问题,这三个问题目前在保守运动中存在分歧。在这些问题上,民族保守派远比他们的对手更接近美国早期的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Liberal Authoritarianism Charles Zeiders and Peter Devlin, Malignant Narcissism and Power:A Psychodynamic Exploration of Madness and Leadership The Promise and Danger of National Conservatism Marie Gayle, Blandine Chelini-Pont, and Mark J. Rozell, editors, Catholics and US Politics after the 2020 Elections: Understanding the “Swing Vote” Corporate America’s Embrace of Wokism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1