The Phenomenon of Play in Boris Mikhailov’s Works of 1966–1980

Natalia Chekh
{"title":"The Phenomenon of Play in Boris Mikhailov’s Works of 1966–1980","authors":"Natalia Chekh","doi":"10.31500/1992-5514.19(1).2023.283146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the game prerequisites of creativity and investigates the play in Boris Mikhailov’s (born August 25, 1938, Kharkiv, Ukrainian SSR) works from 1966 to 1980. Analysis of the artist’s works and narrative interviews enables a historical periodisation of his legacy based on certain markers and principles. During the first, metaphorical stage of his creativity, B. Mikhailov figuratively denies and at the same time praises his current reality in search for the Ideal. The open photo series created by B. Mikhailov at this time have a form ofslide shows of overlays of two colour diapositive films and views of thematic series of photographic prints. The artist presents them during photographic seminars, clubs meetings, and private meetings. Artistic imagery by B. Mikhailov manifests itself in the unfinished transition from life to art and back. The photographer introduced the concept of carnivalization of photography into the theoretical discourse, with carnival images and folk-holiday forms of carnival-type laughter entering the art of photography. Mikhailov’slaughter at this stage is already carnival-like, i.e. ambivalent, universal and nationwide, it has a folk-celebratory nature and is aimed at everything and everyone. In the course of the study, biographical, conceptual, descriptive-phenomenological, hermeneutical, and comparative methods of analysis were applied.","PeriodicalId":499711,"journal":{"name":"Hudožnâ kulʹtura","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hudožnâ kulʹtura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31500/1992-5514.19(1).2023.283146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examines the game prerequisites of creativity and investigates the play in Boris Mikhailov’s (born August 25, 1938, Kharkiv, Ukrainian SSR) works from 1966 to 1980. Analysis of the artist’s works and narrative interviews enables a historical periodisation of his legacy based on certain markers and principles. During the first, metaphorical stage of his creativity, B. Mikhailov figuratively denies and at the same time praises his current reality in search for the Ideal. The open photo series created by B. Mikhailov at this time have a form ofslide shows of overlays of two colour diapositive films and views of thematic series of photographic prints. The artist presents them during photographic seminars, clubs meetings, and private meetings. Artistic imagery by B. Mikhailov manifests itself in the unfinished transition from life to art and back. The photographer introduced the concept of carnivalization of photography into the theoretical discourse, with carnival images and folk-holiday forms of carnival-type laughter entering the art of photography. Mikhailov’slaughter at this stage is already carnival-like, i.e. ambivalent, universal and nationwide, it has a folk-celebratory nature and is aimed at everything and everyone. In the course of the study, biographical, conceptual, descriptive-phenomenological, hermeneutical, and comparative methods of analysis were applied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鲍里斯·米哈伊洛夫1966-1980年作品中的游戏现象
本文考察了创造性的游戏先决条件,并调查了鲍里斯·米哈伊洛夫(生于1938年8月25日,哈尔科夫,乌克兰苏维埃社会主义共和国)1966年至1980年作品中的游戏。通过对艺术家作品的分析和对他的叙述性采访,我们可以根据一定的标记和原则对他的遗产进行历史分期。在他创作的第一个隐喻阶段,B. Mikhailov在寻找理想的过程中,形象地否认并同时赞扬了他目前的现实。B. Mikhailov在这个时候创作的开放式照片系列有两张彩色底片叠加的幻灯片和主题系列照片的视图。艺术家在摄影研讨会、俱乐部会议和私人会议上展示他们。米哈伊洛夫的艺术意象体现在从生活到艺术的未完成的过渡中。摄影师将摄影狂欢化的概念引入理论话语,狂欢式的图像和狂欢式的笑声等民间节日形式进入摄影艺术。米哈伊洛夫在这个阶段的屠杀已经是狂欢节式的,即矛盾的,普遍的和全国性的,它具有民间庆祝的性质,针对的是每件事和每一个人。在研究过程中,采用了传记、概念、描述现象学、解释学和比较分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interaction of Music and the Mythical Chronotope: Comparative Analysis of the Films by L. Visconti and F. Zeller Clarinet Quintet and the Legacy of the Mannheim Chapel Composers Japan: Travel notes Local Forms of Festival Space in Drohobych Performance Interpretation of Miroslava’s Vocal Part in The Golden Hoop Opera by Borys Lyatoshynsky
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1