Colonization and different types of institutional change: findings from an ex-British colony

IF 0.8 4区 管理学 Q1 HISTORY Management & Organizational History Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI:10.1080/17449359.2023.2279766
Epaminondas Epaminonda
{"title":"Colonization and different types of institutional change: findings from an ex-British colony","authors":"Epaminondas Epaminonda","doi":"10.1080/17449359.2023.2279766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper analyzes institutional change during the British colonial period (1878–1960) and briefly after independence in Cyprus and discusses different types of institutional transformations and the features of resulting institutions and the likely effects on organizations. By doing this, it aims to contribute to management and organization studies by adopting the view that institutionalization is an inherently historical process and may be better understood through historical analysis. The institutions considered are the legal system, education and industrial relations. Findings suggest that incremental processes of change led to both evolutionary and radical changes in institutions and that the type of institutional transformations included replacement, displacement and layering. Resulting institutions at the end of the colonial period are characterized by uniformity, bipolarism and diversity, and these features offer more ‘socioeconomic space’ for organizations to function in. Similar shifts in respective institutions are expected in other ex-colonies, and these institutional features are likely to differentiate, it is argued, ex-colonies from socioeconomically similar countries that did not go through colonial rule.KEYWORDS: Institutionsinstitutional changeBritishcolonialismCyprus Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Data are from the area of the Republic of Cyprus under government control.Additional informationNotes on contributorsEpaminondas EpaminondaEpaminondas Epaminonda is an Associate Professor in the Department of Management of the Business School of the University of Nicosia. His research interests are in the areas of comparative management, economic organization and institutional change. He holds BA and MA degrees from the University of Cambridge, an MBA from Imperial College and a PhD from Manchester Business School.","PeriodicalId":45724,"journal":{"name":"Management & Organizational History","volume":"10 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Organizational History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2023.2279766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper analyzes institutional change during the British colonial period (1878–1960) and briefly after independence in Cyprus and discusses different types of institutional transformations and the features of resulting institutions and the likely effects on organizations. By doing this, it aims to contribute to management and organization studies by adopting the view that institutionalization is an inherently historical process and may be better understood through historical analysis. The institutions considered are the legal system, education and industrial relations. Findings suggest that incremental processes of change led to both evolutionary and radical changes in institutions and that the type of institutional transformations included replacement, displacement and layering. Resulting institutions at the end of the colonial period are characterized by uniformity, bipolarism and diversity, and these features offer more ‘socioeconomic space’ for organizations to function in. Similar shifts in respective institutions are expected in other ex-colonies, and these institutional features are likely to differentiate, it is argued, ex-colonies from socioeconomically similar countries that did not go through colonial rule.KEYWORDS: Institutionsinstitutional changeBritishcolonialismCyprus Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Data are from the area of the Republic of Cyprus under government control.Additional informationNotes on contributorsEpaminondas EpaminondaEpaminondas Epaminonda is an Associate Professor in the Department of Management of the Business School of the University of Nicosia. His research interests are in the areas of comparative management, economic organization and institutional change. He holds BA and MA degrees from the University of Cambridge, an MBA from Imperial College and a PhD from Manchester Business School.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
殖民和不同类型的制度变革:来自前英国殖民地的发现
摘要本文分析了英国殖民时期(1878-1960)和塞浦路斯独立后的制度变迁,并讨论了不同类型的制度变迁,以及由此产生的制度特征和对组织可能产生的影响。通过这样做,它旨在通过采用制度化是一个内在的历史过程的观点,并通过历史分析可以更好地理解,从而为管理和组织研究做出贡献。考虑的机构包括法律制度、教育和劳资关系。研究结果表明,渐进式变化过程导致了制度的进化和激进变化,制度变革的类型包括替代、置换和分层。殖民时期结束后的机构具有一致性、两极化和多样性的特征,这些特征为组织提供了更多的“社会经济空间”。预计其他前殖民地也会出现类似的制度转变,这些制度特征可能会将前殖民地与没有经历过殖民统治的社会经济相似的国家区分开来。关键词:制度;制度变迁;英国殖民主义;塞浦路斯披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。数据来自塞浦路斯共和国政府控制下的地区。作者简介:epaminondas epaminondas Epaminonda是尼科西亚大学商学院管理学系的副教授。主要研究领域为比较管理、经济组织和制度变迁。他拥有剑桥大学的学士和硕士学位,帝国理工学院的工商管理硕士学位和曼彻斯特商学院的博士学位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.
期刊最新文献
The history of entrepreneurship education in the United Kingdom: 1860-2020 Family entrepreneurs and their next generations, 1809–1945: educational pathways of business elite in Finland Who watches the watchdogs? Central bank board members and banking supervisors in Switzerland (1907–2008) Informing the ontologies of organizational histories: the critical conceptualization of events and actualization in organizing Who determined the rules of the game in the Spanish financial reforms, 1970-1990?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1