{"title":"Colonization and different types of institutional change: findings from an ex-British colony","authors":"Epaminondas Epaminonda","doi":"10.1080/17449359.2023.2279766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper analyzes institutional change during the British colonial period (1878–1960) and briefly after independence in Cyprus and discusses different types of institutional transformations and the features of resulting institutions and the likely effects on organizations. By doing this, it aims to contribute to management and organization studies by adopting the view that institutionalization is an inherently historical process and may be better understood through historical analysis. The institutions considered are the legal system, education and industrial relations. Findings suggest that incremental processes of change led to both evolutionary and radical changes in institutions and that the type of institutional transformations included replacement, displacement and layering. Resulting institutions at the end of the colonial period are characterized by uniformity, bipolarism and diversity, and these features offer more ‘socioeconomic space’ for organizations to function in. Similar shifts in respective institutions are expected in other ex-colonies, and these institutional features are likely to differentiate, it is argued, ex-colonies from socioeconomically similar countries that did not go through colonial rule.KEYWORDS: Institutionsinstitutional changeBritishcolonialismCyprus Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Data are from the area of the Republic of Cyprus under government control.Additional informationNotes on contributorsEpaminondas EpaminondaEpaminondas Epaminonda is an Associate Professor in the Department of Management of the Business School of the University of Nicosia. His research interests are in the areas of comparative management, economic organization and institutional change. He holds BA and MA degrees from the University of Cambridge, an MBA from Imperial College and a PhD from Manchester Business School.","PeriodicalId":45724,"journal":{"name":"Management & Organizational History","volume":"10 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Organizational History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2023.2279766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTThis paper analyzes institutional change during the British colonial period (1878–1960) and briefly after independence in Cyprus and discusses different types of institutional transformations and the features of resulting institutions and the likely effects on organizations. By doing this, it aims to contribute to management and organization studies by adopting the view that institutionalization is an inherently historical process and may be better understood through historical analysis. The institutions considered are the legal system, education and industrial relations. Findings suggest that incremental processes of change led to both evolutionary and radical changes in institutions and that the type of institutional transformations included replacement, displacement and layering. Resulting institutions at the end of the colonial period are characterized by uniformity, bipolarism and diversity, and these features offer more ‘socioeconomic space’ for organizations to function in. Similar shifts in respective institutions are expected in other ex-colonies, and these institutional features are likely to differentiate, it is argued, ex-colonies from socioeconomically similar countries that did not go through colonial rule.KEYWORDS: Institutionsinstitutional changeBritishcolonialismCyprus Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Data are from the area of the Republic of Cyprus under government control.Additional informationNotes on contributorsEpaminondas EpaminondaEpaminondas Epaminonda is an Associate Professor in the Department of Management of the Business School of the University of Nicosia. His research interests are in the areas of comparative management, economic organization and institutional change. He holds BA and MA degrees from the University of Cambridge, an MBA from Imperial College and a PhD from Manchester Business School.
期刊介绍:
Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.