Sheathless radial approach in contemporary coronary rotational atherectomy: data from two high-volume centers

Gianni Dall’Ara, Giulia Alagna, Daniela Spartà, Miriam Compagnone, Simone Grotti, Giuseppe Guerrieri, Francesca Campanella, Giovanni Taverna, Marcello Galvani, Fabio Tarantino, Giuseppe Andò
{"title":"Sheathless radial approach in contemporary coronary rotational atherectomy: data from two high-volume centers","authors":"Gianni Dall’Ara, Giulia Alagna, Daniela Spartà, Miriam Compagnone, Simone Grotti, Giuseppe Guerrieri, Francesca Campanella, Giovanni Taverna, Marcello Galvani, Fabio Tarantino, Giuseppe Andò","doi":"10.20517/2574-1209.2023.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To analyze the feasibility and procedural outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using rotational atherectomy (RA), performed via transradial sheathless guiding catheter, as compared to a standard radial and femoral vascular approach. Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing RA at two high-volume PCI centers from May 2011 to May 2023 were included. Comparisons were made between the two transradial approaches and between the three types of vascular access. Results: Two hundred twenty-three patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar, with the exception of gender. We observed, in percentages, fewer cases of failure for sheathless than standard transradial attempts (7.5% vs. 11.5%, respectively), whereas all trans-femoral attempts were successful. Transfemoral procedures were longer and more frequently performed under mechanical circulatory support. There was no difference in procedural success between the three vascular approaches. A trend towards a higher rate of vascular and bleeding complications was found in the femoral group. Conclusion: Sheathless transradial vascular access is a viable option when performing RA during complex PCI procedures, tending to result in fewer failures than the standard transradial approach and reduced bleeding and vascular complications compared to the femoral method.","PeriodicalId":75299,"journal":{"name":"Vessel plus","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vessel plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To analyze the feasibility and procedural outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using rotational atherectomy (RA), performed via transradial sheathless guiding catheter, as compared to a standard radial and femoral vascular approach. Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing RA at two high-volume PCI centers from May 2011 to May 2023 were included. Comparisons were made between the two transradial approaches and between the three types of vascular access. Results: Two hundred twenty-three patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar, with the exception of gender. We observed, in percentages, fewer cases of failure for sheathless than standard transradial attempts (7.5% vs. 11.5%, respectively), whereas all trans-femoral attempts were successful. Transfemoral procedures were longer and more frequently performed under mechanical circulatory support. There was no difference in procedural success between the three vascular approaches. A trend towards a higher rate of vascular and bleeding complications was found in the femoral group. Conclusion: Sheathless transradial vascular access is a viable option when performing RA during complex PCI procedures, tending to result in fewer failures than the standard transradial approach and reduced bleeding and vascular complications compared to the femoral method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无鞘桡骨入路在当代冠状动脉旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术中的应用:来自两个大容量中心的数据
目的:分析经桡动脉无鞘导管行旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术(RA)的可行性和手术结果,并与标准桡动脉和股动脉入路进行比较。方法:纳入2011年5月至2023年5月在两个大容量PCI中心连续接受RA的所有患者。比较了两种经桡动脉入路和三种血管通路。结果:共纳入223例患者。基线特征是相似的,除了性别。我们观察到,在百分比上,无鞘置入失败的病例比标准经桡骨置入失败的病例少(分别为7.5%和11.5%),而所有经股骨置入均成功。在机械循环支持下,经股手术时间更长,更频繁。三种血管入路的手术成功率无差异。在股动脉组有较高的血管和出血并发症的趋势。结论:在复杂的PCI手术中,无鞘经桡骨血管通路是一种可行的选择,与标准经桡骨入路相比,其失败率更低,与股动脉入路相比,出血和血管并发症更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Echocardiographic cardiac views classification using whale optimization and weighted support vector machine Association of inflammation, oxidative stress, and deteriorated cognitive functions in patients after cardiac surgery Role of inflammation in the progression of diabetic kidney disease Multivessel disease in patient with acute myocardial infarction: current treatment strategies and future perspectives Editorial review: guidance for future atrial fibrillation research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1