How Do Fast-Fashion Copycats Affect the Popularity of Premium Brands? Evidence from Social Media

IF 5.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Marketing Research Pub Date : 2023-06-12 DOI:10.1177/00222437231164403
Zijun (June) Shi, Xiao Liu, Dokyun Lee, Kannan Srinivasan
{"title":"How Do Fast-Fashion Copycats Affect the Popularity of Premium Brands? Evidence from Social Media","authors":"Zijun (June) Shi, Xiao Liu, Dokyun Lee, Kannan Srinivasan","doi":"10.1177/00222437231164403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The erosion of high-end fashion brands by fast-fashion copycats (e.g., Zara, H&M) has stirred controversies and unceasing legal attempts to copyright fashion designs. Despite the purported negative impact of copycats, the effect of fashion copycats on high-end brands remains empirically unclear. Research on this topic has been impeded by the absence of a modeling framework to quantify fashion and by the lack of consumer-level data on fashion choices. The authors collect data on the posting behaviors of consumers on a fashion-specific social media platform and develop a dynamic structural model with deep learning image analytics to characterize consumers’ choices of brands and styles. Results suggest that fast-fashion copycats can both harm high-end brands (a cannibalization effect) and help them (a market expansion effect). The authors also identify both static and dynamic mechanisms that contribute to the market expansion effect: The affordability of mixing copycats with high-end brands boosts the number of high-end items featured in posts by financially constrained consumers (a static mechanism). In addition, good styles from copycats enable users to build their popularity on social media over time, which may increase the users' valuation of high-end brands and reduce the users' future costs via sponsorship opportunities (dynamic mechanisms). The results could inform policy makers about the potential consequences of prohibiting fashion copycats.","PeriodicalId":48465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Research","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437231164403","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The erosion of high-end fashion brands by fast-fashion copycats (e.g., Zara, H&M) has stirred controversies and unceasing legal attempts to copyright fashion designs. Despite the purported negative impact of copycats, the effect of fashion copycats on high-end brands remains empirically unclear. Research on this topic has been impeded by the absence of a modeling framework to quantify fashion and by the lack of consumer-level data on fashion choices. The authors collect data on the posting behaviors of consumers on a fashion-specific social media platform and develop a dynamic structural model with deep learning image analytics to characterize consumers’ choices of brands and styles. Results suggest that fast-fashion copycats can both harm high-end brands (a cannibalization effect) and help them (a market expansion effect). The authors also identify both static and dynamic mechanisms that contribute to the market expansion effect: The affordability of mixing copycats with high-end brands boosts the number of high-end items featured in posts by financially constrained consumers (a static mechanism). In addition, good styles from copycats enable users to build their popularity on social media over time, which may increase the users' valuation of high-end brands and reduce the users' future costs via sponsorship opportunities (dynamic mechanisms). The results could inform policy makers about the potential consequences of prohibiting fashion copycats.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快时尚模仿者如何影响高端品牌的受欢迎程度?来自社交媒体的证据
快时尚模仿者对高端时尚品牌的侵蚀(如Zara、H&M)引发了争议和不断的对时尚设计版权的法律尝试。尽管模仿者有负面影响,但时尚模仿者对高端品牌的影响在经验上仍不清楚。由于缺乏量化时尚的建模框架,以及缺乏消费者层面的时尚选择数据,这一主题的研究一直受到阻碍。作者收集了消费者在时尚社交媒体平台上的发帖行为数据,并利用深度学习图像分析开发了一个动态结构模型,以表征消费者对品牌和风格的选择。研究结果表明,快时尚的模仿者既可以损害高端品牌(一种蚕食效应),也可以帮助它们(一种市场扩张效应)。作者还指出了促进市场扩张效应的静态和动态机制:将山寨产品与高端品牌混在一起的可承受性提高了经济拮据的消费者在帖子中推荐高端产品的数量(静态机制)。此外,模仿者的好风格可以让用户随着时间的推移在社交媒体上建立自己的知名度,这可能会增加用户对高端品牌的估值,并通过赞助机会(动态机制)降低用户未来的成本。研究结果可以让政策制定者了解禁止时尚模仿者的潜在后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JMR is written for those academics and practitioners of marketing research who need to be in the forefront of the profession and in possession of the industry"s cutting-edge information. JMR publishes articles representing the entire spectrum of research in marketing. The editorial content is peer-reviewed by an expert panel of leading academics. Articles address the concepts, methods, and applications of marketing research that present new techniques for solving marketing problems; contribute to marketing knowledge based on the use of experimental, descriptive, or analytical techniques; and review and comment on the developments and concepts in related fields that have a bearing on the research industry and its practices.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Who Shares Fake News? Uncovering Insights from Social Media Users' Post Histories EXPRESS: Monitoring Technologies in Industrial Systems EXPRESS: How Listening versus Reading Alters Consumers’ Interpretations of News EXPRESS: The Closing-the-Gap Effect: Joint Evaluation Leads Donors to Help Charities Farther from Their Goal EXPRESS: Zooming in on the Very Early Days: The Role of Trademark Applications in the Acquisition of Venture Capital Seed Funding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1