Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India

IF 3.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.1080/14735903.2023.2270250
A. K. Nayak, Rahul Tripathi, B. Dhal, A. D. Nayak, S. Vijayakumar, B. Satpathy, D. Chatterjee, C. K. Swain, K. C. Moharana, P. K. Nayak, Annie Poonam, Sangita Mohanty, M. Shahid, Anjani Kumar, B. Mondal, B. B. Panda, A. K. Patra, S. K. Swain, H. Pathak
{"title":"Eco-efficiency and technical efficiency of different integrated farming systems in eastern India","authors":"A. K. Nayak, Rahul Tripathi, B. Dhal, A. D. Nayak, S. Vijayakumar, B. Satpathy, D. Chatterjee, C. K. Swain, K. C. Moharana, P. K. Nayak, Annie Poonam, Sangita Mohanty, M. Shahid, Anjani Kumar, B. Mondal, B. B. Panda, A. K. Patra, S. K. Swain, H. Pathak","doi":"10.1080/14735903.2023.2270250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integrated farming system (IFS), comprising various enterprises such as crop, horticulture, dairy, poultry and fishery optimally, uses farm resources to suit small and medium farms of India. In this study, 55 IFSs with different sizes and several enterprises were assessed in terms of their environment impact, eco-efficiency and technical efficiency (TE). The households, which own these IFS, were grouped into four major categories based on farm size viz., marginal (<0.8 ha), small (0.8–1.2 ha), medium (1.2–2.0 ha) and large (>2.0 ha). Among the farm size category, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded for marginal farms, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed for small farms. The highest eco-efficiency was recorded for farm having five enterprises (INR195 kg CO2eq. ha−1) followed by four enterprises (INR190 kg CO2eq.ha−1). Among the enterprises, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded in fruits, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed in dairy. The TE scores estimated using stochastic frontier analysis decreased with increasing farm size and the highest TE score was recorded for marginal farms, whereas medium and large farms recorded the lowest TE scores. The findings indicated the necessity for imparting training and demonstrations and funding support as well as subsidy for larger adoption of IFS to reap higher returns.","PeriodicalId":50342,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability","volume":"3 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2023.2270250","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrated farming system (IFS), comprising various enterprises such as crop, horticulture, dairy, poultry and fishery optimally, uses farm resources to suit small and medium farms of India. In this study, 55 IFSs with different sizes and several enterprises were assessed in terms of their environment impact, eco-efficiency and technical efficiency (TE). The households, which own these IFS, were grouped into four major categories based on farm size viz., marginal (<0.8 ha), small (0.8–1.2 ha), medium (1.2–2.0 ha) and large (>2.0 ha). Among the farm size category, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded for marginal farms, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed for small farms. The highest eco-efficiency was recorded for farm having five enterprises (INR195 kg CO2eq. ha−1) followed by four enterprises (INR190 kg CO2eq.ha−1). Among the enterprises, the highest eco-efficiency was recorded in fruits, whereas the lowest eco-efficiency was observed in dairy. The TE scores estimated using stochastic frontier analysis decreased with increasing farm size and the highest TE score was recorded for marginal farms, whereas medium and large farms recorded the lowest TE scores. The findings indicated the necessity for imparting training and demonstrations and funding support as well as subsidy for larger adoption of IFS to reap higher returns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度东部不同综合农业系统的生态效率和技术效率
综合农业系统(IFS)由作物、园艺、乳制品、家禽和渔业等各种企业组成,最优地利用农场资源来适应印度的中小型农场。本研究以55间不同规模及多间企业的ifs为研究对象,就其环境影响、生态效率及技术效率(TE)进行评估。拥有这些IFS的家庭根据农场规模分为四大类,即边际(2.0公顷)。在农场规模类别中,边际农场的生态效率最高,而小农场的生态效率最低。拥有5家企业的农场(INR195 kg co2当量)的生态效率最高。ha−1),其次是4家企业(INR190 kg CO2eq.ha−1)。其中,水果行业的生态效率最高,而乳制品行业的生态效率最低。使用随机前沿分析估计的TE得分随着农场规模的增加而降低,边缘农场的TE得分最高,而中型和大型农场的TE得分最低。调查结果表明,有必要提供培训和示范以及资金支持和补贴,以便更广泛地采用IFS以获得更高的回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
23.50%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability ( IJAS) is a cross-disciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the understanding of sustainability in agricultural and food systems. IJAS publishes both theoretical developments and critical appraisals of new evidence on what is not sustainable about current or past agricultural and food systems, as well as on transitions towards agricultural and rural sustainability at farm, community, regional, national and international levels, and through food supply chains. It is committed to clear and consistent use of language and logic, and the use of appropriate evidence to substantiate empirical statements. IJAS increases knowledge on what technologies and processes are contributing to agricultural sustainability, what policies, institutions and economic structures are preventing or promoting sustainability, and what relevant lessons should be learned.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the dairy sustainability assessment tool (DSAT) for dairy systems in East Africa Does the digital economy exhibit multiplier effects? A case study on the optimization of agricultural production structure in rural digital economy Are farmers’ minds really too elusive to capture? A novel evaluation framework for the knowledge transfer initiatives in agriculture Barriers and enablers of digital extension services’ adoption among smallholder farmers: the case of Cambodia, the Philippines and Vietnam A theory-driven framework for the design and implementation of successful agri-environmental programmes: results of a realist review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1