Europe, the MENA region and knowledge production Reviewed books Joseph, S., Meari, L., and Zaatari, Z. (Eds.). The Politics of Engaged Gender Research in the Arab Region: Feminist Fieldwork and the Production of Knowledge . Bloomsbury Publishing , 2022.Kmak, M., and Björklund, H. Refugees and Knowledge Production: Europe’s Past and Present (p. 234) . Taylor & Francis , 2022.Pace, M., and Völkel, J. C. Knowledge production in higher education: The Middle…

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of European Integration Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1080/07036337.2023.2259647
Dafne Carletti, Sara Tonsy
{"title":"Europe, the MENA region and knowledge production <b>Reviewed books</b> Joseph, S., Meari, L., and Zaatari, Z. (Eds.). <i>The Politics of Engaged Gender Research in the Arab Region: Feminist Fieldwork and the Production of Knowledge</i> . <i>Bloomsbury Publishing</i> , 2022.Kmak, M., and Björklund, H. <i>Refugees and Knowledge Production: Europe’s Past and Present (p. 234)</i> . <i>Taylor &amp; Francis</i> , 2022.Pace, M., and Völkel, J. C. <i>Knowledge production in higher education: The Middle…","authors":"Dafne Carletti, Sara Tonsy","doi":"10.1080/07036337.2023.2259647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTKnowledge production is one of the most important elements of human interaction. It shapes identities, determines policies, and reflects the understanding of borders and geographies. For instance, how Europe and the MENA region perceive one another depends largely on who creates the discourse, and under which disciplines these discourses are elaborated. For centuries, however, discourse creation has been regulated by neoliberal and patriarchal interests. Such (super-)structures frame how these regions are represented, leading to colonial assumptions, biased knowledge and objectifying research. We argue that knowledge of Europe and the MENA, its creation and diffusion should be critical and horizontal practices, moving towards deterritorialization and decolonisation. Not to succumb to a ‘regional’ hierarchy of global North/South, we need to reflect on the positioning of researchers, acknowledging the liminality of identities, to appreciate the dynamic nature of boundaries, and to revisit various elements of knowledge production as language, freedom of movement, and funding. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2259647","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTKnowledge production is one of the most important elements of human interaction. It shapes identities, determines policies, and reflects the understanding of borders and geographies. For instance, how Europe and the MENA region perceive one another depends largely on who creates the discourse, and under which disciplines these discourses are elaborated. For centuries, however, discourse creation has been regulated by neoliberal and patriarchal interests. Such (super-)structures frame how these regions are represented, leading to colonial assumptions, biased knowledge and objectifying research. We argue that knowledge of Europe and the MENA, its creation and diffusion should be critical and horizontal practices, moving towards deterritorialization and decolonisation. Not to succumb to a ‘regional’ hierarchy of global North/South, we need to reflect on the positioning of researchers, acknowledging the liminality of identities, to appreciate the dynamic nature of boundaries, and to revisit various elements of knowledge production as language, freedom of movement, and funding. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲,中东和北非地区和知识生产回顾书籍约瑟夫,S., Meari, L.,和Zaatari, Z.(编辑)。阿拉伯地区参与式性别研究的政治:女性主义田野调查与知识生产。布卢姆斯伯里出版社,2022年。M. Kmak, Björklund, H.《难民与知识生产:欧洲的过去与现在》(第234页)。泰勒,弗朗西斯,2022年。Pace, M.和Völkel, J. C.高等教育中的知识生产:中…
摘要知识生产是人类交往的重要内容之一。它塑造了身份,决定了政策,反映了对边界和地理的理解。例如,欧洲和中东和北非地区如何看待彼此在很大程度上取决于谁创造了话语,以及这些话语是在哪些学科下阐述的。然而,几个世纪以来,话语创造一直受到新自由主义和父权利益的制约。这样的(超)结构框定了这些地区的表现方式,导致了殖民假设、有偏见的知识和客观化的研究。我们认为,欧洲和中东和北非的知识,其创建和传播应该是关键的和横向的做法,走向去领土化和非殖民化。为了不屈服于全球南北的“区域”等级制度,我们需要反思研究人员的定位,承认身份的有限性,欣赏边界的动态本质,并重新审视知识生产的各种要素,如语言、行动自由和资金。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1