Irritancy testing in cultured keratinocytes.

Molecular toxicology Pub Date : 1987-09-01
L Gajjar, D J Benford
{"title":"Irritancy testing in cultured keratinocytes.","authors":"L Gajjar,&nbsp;D J Benford","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A differentiating keratinocyte cell line derived from explant cultures of rat sublingual epithelium has been used as a potential in vitro model for topical (skin) irritation of a range of detergents. The end points used to assess toxicity were acid phosphatase (AP) activity after 4 h of dosing and neutral red (NR) uptake and kenacid blue (KB) staining after 3 d to assess cell viability and number. The acid phosphatase activity increased to a sharp peak with increasing doses, then fell equally sharply for the anionic detergent sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and cationic detergents TMABs (trimethylammonium bromides). With the Tweens (the least toxic group) there was no acid phosphatase peak or it appeared at the highest dose level used (1.0 mg/ml). The dose-response curves for NR uptake paralleled those for KB staining. With all of the three end points, it was apparent that the order of toxicity for the different groups was TMABs greater than SDS greater than Tweens, with a difference of one order of magnitude between consecutive groups when using NR and KB.</p>","PeriodicalId":77750,"journal":{"name":"Molecular toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A differentiating keratinocyte cell line derived from explant cultures of rat sublingual epithelium has been used as a potential in vitro model for topical (skin) irritation of a range of detergents. The end points used to assess toxicity were acid phosphatase (AP) activity after 4 h of dosing and neutral red (NR) uptake and kenacid blue (KB) staining after 3 d to assess cell viability and number. The acid phosphatase activity increased to a sharp peak with increasing doses, then fell equally sharply for the anionic detergent sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and cationic detergents TMABs (trimethylammonium bromides). With the Tweens (the least toxic group) there was no acid phosphatase peak or it appeared at the highest dose level used (1.0 mg/ml). The dose-response curves for NR uptake paralleled those for KB staining. With all of the three end points, it was apparent that the order of toxicity for the different groups was TMABs greater than SDS greater than Tweens, with a difference of one order of magnitude between consecutive groups when using NR and KB.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养角质形成细胞的刺激试验。
来自大鼠舌下上皮外植体培养的分化角质细胞系已被用作一系列洗涤剂局部(皮肤)刺激的潜在体外模型。评估毒性的终点是给药4小时后酸性磷酸酶(AP)活性和3天后中性红(NR)摄取和kenacid blue (KB)染色,以评估细胞活力和数量。阴离子洗涤剂十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)和阳离子洗涤剂tmab(三甲基溴化铵)的酸性磷酸酶活性随着剂量的增加而急剧上升,然后急剧下降。毒性最小的Tweens组在最高剂量(1.0 mg/ml)时没有出现酸性磷酸酶峰。NR摄取的剂量-反应曲线与KB染色相似。从三个终点可以明显看出,不同组的毒性顺序为tmab > SDS > Tweens,在使用NR和KB时,连续组之间的差异为一个数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Xenobiotic regulation of glutathione S-transferase Ya gene expression. Review: gene amplification--a cellular response to genotoxic stress. Limitations of the fluorescent probe viability assay. Induction of a novel damage-specific DNA binding protein correlates with enhanced DNA repair in primate cells. Induction of a novel damage-specific DNA binding protein correlates with enhanced DNA repair in primate cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1