Comparative Study of Elementary School Mathematics Textbooks between Singapore and Indonesia: The Case of Fractions

Q3 Multidisciplinary Acta Scientiae Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI:10.17648/acta.scientiae.7446
Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo, Yashinta Meyliana Fatima, Amiroh Amiroh, Fidariya Mawaddah, Irfan Wahyu Prananto, Fery Muhammad Firdaus
{"title":"Comparative Study of Elementary School Mathematics Textbooks between Singapore and Indonesia: The Case of Fractions","authors":"Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo, Yashinta Meyliana Fatima, Amiroh Amiroh, Fidariya Mawaddah, Irfan Wahyu Prananto, Fery Muhammad Firdaus","doi":"10.17648/acta.scientiae.7446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Mathematics textbooks are one of the tools that link the expected goals of the mathematics curriculum and its practice in mathematics classes. Thus, reviewing mathematics textbooks between countries is one way to reflect and improve based on good practice. Objectives : To examine the structure and order of contents presented in Indonesian and Singaporean mathematics textbooks, as well as the differences between the two. Design : This research uses textbook comparison study and focuses on how mathematical tasks are presented. The two textbooks compared are Senang Belajar Matematika (Indonesia) and My Pals Are Here (Singapore). Data collection and analysis : We analyzed it by conducting coding based on the adaptation of Gracin’s framework which includes five dimensions of analysis: content, mathematical activity, level of complexity, answer form, and contextual features. The validated coding results are used to report research results. Results : Some aspects of competence for each textbook tend to have the same proportions. In the mathematical activity aspect, both provide operation and calculation activities that are more dominant than the others. However, Singaporean mathematics textbooks offer more opportunities for argumentation and reasoning, and interpretation activities, which interpretation activities are not available in Indonesian mathematics textbooks. We also found that both textbooks offer a variety of task activity types, with the Indonesian textbook offering more types. Conclusions : The two textbooks' structure and order of content are significantly different, with the distribution of the number of tasks for each dimension being more even in Singaporean textbook.","PeriodicalId":36967,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Mathematics textbooks are one of the tools that link the expected goals of the mathematics curriculum and its practice in mathematics classes. Thus, reviewing mathematics textbooks between countries is one way to reflect and improve based on good practice. Objectives : To examine the structure and order of contents presented in Indonesian and Singaporean mathematics textbooks, as well as the differences between the two. Design : This research uses textbook comparison study and focuses on how mathematical tasks are presented. The two textbooks compared are Senang Belajar Matematika (Indonesia) and My Pals Are Here (Singapore). Data collection and analysis : We analyzed it by conducting coding based on the adaptation of Gracin’s framework which includes five dimensions of analysis: content, mathematical activity, level of complexity, answer form, and contextual features. The validated coding results are used to report research results. Results : Some aspects of competence for each textbook tend to have the same proportions. In the mathematical activity aspect, both provide operation and calculation activities that are more dominant than the others. However, Singaporean mathematics textbooks offer more opportunities for argumentation and reasoning, and interpretation activities, which interpretation activities are not available in Indonesian mathematics textbooks. We also found that both textbooks offer a variety of task activity types, with the Indonesian textbook offering more types. Conclusions : The two textbooks' structure and order of content are significantly different, with the distribution of the number of tasks for each dimension being more even in Singaporean textbook.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新加坡与印尼小学数学教科书比较研究:以分数为例
背景:数学教材是连接数学课程预期目标与数学课堂实践的工具之一。因此,国与国之间互阅数学教科书是一种反思和在良好实践的基础上改进的方式。目的:研究印尼和新加坡数学教科书的结构和内容顺序,以及两者之间的差异。设计:本研究采用教科书比较研究,重点研究数学任务的呈现方式。比较的两本教科书分别是印尼的《我的朋友在这里》和新加坡的《我的朋友在这里》。数据收集与分析:基于Gracin框架的改编进行编码分析,该框架包括内容、数学活动、复杂程度、答案形式和语境特征五个维度的分析。验证后的编码结果用于报告研究结果。结果:各教材在能力的某些方面呈现出相同的比例。在数学活动方面,两者都提供了运算和计算活动,这些活动比其他活动更占优势。然而,新加坡的数学教科书提供了更多的论证和推理的机会,以及解释活动,这些解释活动是印度尼西亚数学教科书所没有的。我们还发现,两种教科书都提供了各种各样的任务活动类型,印尼教科书提供了更多的类型。结论:两种教科书在内容结构和顺序上存在显著差异,新加坡教科书在各维度的任务数量分布更为均匀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Scientiae
Acta Scientiae Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Preservice Mathematics Teachers' Beliefs about Problem-Solving in Culturally Diverse Classrooms Transitional-Apprehending Mental Model for Junior High School Students in Understanding the Concept of Integers Meaning of Problem in School Mathematics: From Exercise and Application to the Learning-Triggering Problem Learnings and Reflections by (Future) Teachers on Anticipation in Exploratory Mathematics Teaching Interdisciplinary Extension Program in Teaching: Challenges, Possibilities, and Unexpected Situations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1