Relationship between the 4 mmol running velocity, the time-distance relationship and the Léger-Boucher's test.

J M Lechevalier, H Vandewalle, J C Chatard, A Moreaux, V Gandrieux, F Besson, H Monod
{"title":"Relationship between the 4 mmol running velocity, the time-distance relationship and the Léger-Boucher's test.","authors":"J M Lechevalier,&nbsp;H Vandewalle,&nbsp;J C Chatard,&nbsp;A Moreaux,&nbsp;V Gandrieux,&nbsp;F Besson,&nbsp;H Monod","doi":"10.3109/13813458909104547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between distance and best time is roughly linear for distances between 1500 and 5000 m. The slope of this relationship has the dimension of a velocity (Vlim) which can be sustained during a long time. The individual time-distance relationships and the resulting Vlim have been studied in 32 subjects practicing different athletic activities by measuring exhaustion time for 2 to 4 constant-velocity running exercises performed to exhaustion. The velocity corresponding to 4 mmol.l-1 of blood lactate (V4 mmol) has been compared with Vlim. As maximal oxygen uptake is a major factor determining V4 mmol, Vlim and V4 mmol have also been correlated with the result of a field test which is assumed to measure maximal aerobic power (Léger-Boucher's test). This test consists in running until exhaustion at a velocity which increases every two minutes. The higher the velocity at exhaustion (Vléger) is, the higher the maximal oxygen uptake is assumed. Both Vlim and Vléger were very well correlated with V4 mmol (r greater than 0.90) and the average value of Vlim was almost equal to the average value of V4 mmol (13.89 vs 13.71 km.h-1). However, it was not possible to estimate V4 mmol accurately from the values of Vlim or Vléger because the standard errors of estimates were too large.</p>","PeriodicalId":8170,"journal":{"name":"Archives internationales de physiologie et de biochimie","volume":"97 5","pages":"355-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/13813458909104547","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives internationales de physiologie et de biochimie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13813458909104547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

The relationship between distance and best time is roughly linear for distances between 1500 and 5000 m. The slope of this relationship has the dimension of a velocity (Vlim) which can be sustained during a long time. The individual time-distance relationships and the resulting Vlim have been studied in 32 subjects practicing different athletic activities by measuring exhaustion time for 2 to 4 constant-velocity running exercises performed to exhaustion. The velocity corresponding to 4 mmol.l-1 of blood lactate (V4 mmol) has been compared with Vlim. As maximal oxygen uptake is a major factor determining V4 mmol, Vlim and V4 mmol have also been correlated with the result of a field test which is assumed to measure maximal aerobic power (Léger-Boucher's test). This test consists in running until exhaustion at a velocity which increases every two minutes. The higher the velocity at exhaustion (Vléger) is, the higher the maximal oxygen uptake is assumed. Both Vlim and Vléger were very well correlated with V4 mmol (r greater than 0.90) and the average value of Vlim was almost equal to the average value of V4 mmol (13.89 vs 13.71 km.h-1). However, it was not possible to estimate V4 mmol accurately from the values of Vlim or Vléger because the standard errors of estimates were too large.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4 mmol跑速、时距关系与lsamger - boucher试验的关系。
距离和最佳时间之间的关系在1500到5000米之间大致是线性的。这种关系的斜率具有可以在很长一段时间内持续的速度(Vlim)的维度。通过对32名被试进行2 ~ 4次等速跑步运动至疲劳状态的疲劳时间测量,研究了个体时间-距离关系及其产生的Vlim。速度等于4mmol。血乳酸l-1 (V4 mmol)与Vlim比较。由于最大摄氧量是决定V4 mmol的主要因素,因此Vlim和V4 mmol也与假定测量最大有氧能力的现场试验结果(l -鲍彻试验)相关。这个测试包括以每两分钟增加一次的速度跑到精疲力竭为止。耗尽速度越高,假定最大摄氧量越高。Vlim和vlsamger与V4 mmol均有极好的相关性(r > 0.90), Vlim的平均值与V4 mmol的平均值几乎相等(13.89 vs 13.71 km.h-1)。然而,由于估计的标准误差太大,不可能从Vlim或vl的值准确地估计V4 mmol。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erucic acid metabolism in rat heart. A combined biochemical and radioautographical study. Inotropic effect of hyperosmotic NaCl solutions on the isolated rat cardiac tissue. [Modification of precocious evoked auditory potential amplitudes observed in tinnitus]. Purification and properties of liver arginase from teleostean fish Clarias batrachus (L.). Slight differences between adenosine deaminases from different species an immunochemical study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1