{"title":"Can the coordinated development of two-way FDI promote carbon emission reduction? Evidence from industrial sectors in China","authors":"Yi Qiu, Hui Hu, Jianjun Wu","doi":"10.1080/09638199.2023.2275162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn this study, the panel data of 34 industrial sectors are selected from 2004 to 2019 in China and empirically tested the carbon emission reduction effect and its transmission path during the coordinated development of two-way FDI. The results show that the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector had a significant but heterogeneous carbon emission reduction effect. The coordinated development of two-way FDI in high-yield scale groups, low-energy-consumption industries and high-tech industries had a stronger inhibitory effect on carbon emissions. When the coordinated development level of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector was high, its carbon emission reduction effect was more significant. After the Belt and Road Initiative was put forward in 2013, the carbon emission reduction effect of the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial industry was stronger. The mechanism test results showed that the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector mainly affected domestic carbon emissions through three transmission paths: scale, structure, and technology effects. Of these, the scale effect was positive, and the structure and technology effects were negative.KEYWORDS: Coordinated development of two-way FDIcarbon emission reductionsimultaneous equation modelsChina's industrial sectorsJEL Classifications: A10A1A Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Credit author statementAll the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection and analysis were performed by Y.Q., H.H. and J.W. The first draft of the manuscript was written by H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.Data availabilityData will be made available on request.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Hunan Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning Fund under Grant number 21ZDAJ007 and Collaborative Innovation Center for Emissions Trading system Co-constructed by the Province and Ministry under Grant number 22CICETS-ZD010 and 22CICETS-YB027.","PeriodicalId":51656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Trade & Economic Development","volume":"275 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Trade & Economic Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2023.2275162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractIn this study, the panel data of 34 industrial sectors are selected from 2004 to 2019 in China and empirically tested the carbon emission reduction effect and its transmission path during the coordinated development of two-way FDI. The results show that the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector had a significant but heterogeneous carbon emission reduction effect. The coordinated development of two-way FDI in high-yield scale groups, low-energy-consumption industries and high-tech industries had a stronger inhibitory effect on carbon emissions. When the coordinated development level of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector was high, its carbon emission reduction effect was more significant. After the Belt and Road Initiative was put forward in 2013, the carbon emission reduction effect of the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial industry was stronger. The mechanism test results showed that the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China's industrial sector mainly affected domestic carbon emissions through three transmission paths: scale, structure, and technology effects. Of these, the scale effect was positive, and the structure and technology effects were negative.KEYWORDS: Coordinated development of two-way FDIcarbon emission reductionsimultaneous equation modelsChina's industrial sectorsJEL Classifications: A10A1A Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Credit author statementAll the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection and analysis were performed by Y.Q., H.H. and J.W. The first draft of the manuscript was written by H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.Data availabilityData will be made available on request.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Hunan Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning Fund under Grant number 21ZDAJ007 and Collaborative Innovation Center for Emissions Trading system Co-constructed by the Province and Ministry under Grant number 22CICETS-ZD010 and 22CICETS-YB027.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development ( JITED) focuses on international economics, economic development, and the interface between trade and development. The links between trade and development economics are critical at a time when fluctuating commodity prices, ongoing production fragmentation, and trade liberalisation can radically affect the economies of advanced and developing countries. Our aim is to keep in touch with the latest developments in research as well as setting the agenda for future analysis. Publication of high quality articles covering; theoretical and applied issues in international and development economics; econometric applications of trade and/or development issues based on sound theoretical economic models or testing fundamental economic hypotheses; models of structural change; trade and development issues of economies in Eastern Europe, Asia and the Pacific area; papers on specific topics which are policy-relevant; review articles on important branches of the literature including controversial and innovative ideas are also welcome. JITED is designed to meet the needs of international and development economists, economic historians, applied economists, and policy makers. The international experts who make up the journal’s Editorial Board encourage contributions from economists world-wide.