Experimental urban commons?: Re-examining urban community food gardens in Cape Town, South Africa

IF 3.6 3区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geographical Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.1111/geoj.12553
Tinashe P. Kanosvamhira, Alexander Follmann, Daniel Tevera
{"title":"Experimental urban commons?: Re-examining urban community food gardens in Cape Town, South Africa","authors":"Tinashe P. Kanosvamhira,&nbsp;Alexander Follmann,&nbsp;Daniel Tevera","doi":"10.1111/geoj.12553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Contemporary literature on urban agriculture often analyses urban community gardens as ‘existing’ commons with the capacity to counter neoliberal urban development and resource management practices. However, the existing literature on ‘political gardening’ generally focuses on cities in North America and Europe, despite the prevalence of urban community gardens and neoliberal planning across other regions, including Southern cities. This paper examines urban community gardens in Cape Town, South Africa to assess their capacity to function as urban commons in six areas: infrastructure, inputs, land, produce, labour and immaterial components. This mixed-methods study employed questionnaires, semi-structured interviews and observations across 34 urban community gardens in the city. The findings and analysis demonstrate how the urban community gardens counter neoliberal privatisation and individualisation processes. However, their capacity to function as urban commons is significantly curtailed by an entrenchment within the neoliberal context. Thus, the urban community gardens are framed as ‘experimental’ commons, a valuable re-conceptualisation of alternative resource utilisation in neoliberal Southern cities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48023,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Journal","volume":"190 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geoj.12553","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geoj.12553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary literature on urban agriculture often analyses urban community gardens as ‘existing’ commons with the capacity to counter neoliberal urban development and resource management practices. However, the existing literature on ‘political gardening’ generally focuses on cities in North America and Europe, despite the prevalence of urban community gardens and neoliberal planning across other regions, including Southern cities. This paper examines urban community gardens in Cape Town, South Africa to assess their capacity to function as urban commons in six areas: infrastructure, inputs, land, produce, labour and immaterial components. This mixed-methods study employed questionnaires, semi-structured interviews and observations across 34 urban community gardens in the city. The findings and analysis demonstrate how the urban community gardens counter neoliberal privatisation and individualisation processes. However, their capacity to function as urban commons is significantly curtailed by an entrenchment within the neoliberal context. Thus, the urban community gardens are framed as ‘experimental’ commons, a valuable re-conceptualisation of alternative resource utilisation in neoliberal Southern cities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实验性城市公地?重新审视南非开普敦的城市社区菜园
当代有关城市农业的文献通常将城市社区菜园分析为 "现有的 "公共资源,有能力对抗 新自由主义的城市发展和资源管理实践。然而,尽管城市社区菜园和新自由主义规划在其他地区(包括南方城市)普遍存在,但现有的 "政治菜园 "文献一般都集中在北美和欧洲的城市。本文研究了南非开普敦的城市社区菜园,以评估其在基础设施、投入、土地、产品、劳动力和非物质成分等六个方面作为城市公共资源发挥作用的能力。这项混合方法研究采用了问卷调查、半结构式访谈和观察等方法,涉及该市的 34 个城市社区菜园。研究结果和分析表明了城市社区菜园是如何对抗新自由主义私有化和个人化进程的。然而,新自由主义背景下的固化大大削弱了它们作为城市公共资源的功能。因此,城市社区菜园被定格为 "实验性 "公地,这是对新自由主义南方城市中替代性资源利用的一种有价值的重新构想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Geographical Journal has been the academic journal of the Royal Geographical Society, under the terms of the Royal Charter, since 1893. It publishes papers from across the entire subject of geography, with particular reference to public debates, policy-orientated agendas.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Presidential Address and record of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) AGM 2024 Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) Medals and Awards celebration 2024 What builds inter-municipal cooperation? Assumed and added effects of a metropolitan bicycle-sharing project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1