The negative Commonwealth: Australia as ‘laboratory’, then and now

IF 1 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Thesis Eleven Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.1177/07255136231206181
Lorenzo Veracini, Dan Tout
{"title":"The negative Commonwealth: Australia as ‘laboratory’, then and now","authors":"Lorenzo Veracini, Dan Tout","doi":"10.1177/07255136231206181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Federated Australia was seen for a long time as a significant social ‘laboratory’. The Commonwealth itself was seen as an ‘experiment’. This widespread metaphor relied on a particular pattern of perception: the country was ‘new’ (it was not), and the country was allegedly isolated (it was not, at least not completely). Many believed that its social environment could be controlled, like that of a scientific laboratory. A laboratory is designed to shut all disturbances out – the value of the data and experiments depends on it. This article outlines this metaphor in the context of Australian history during the 20th century, its rhetorical power and what made it discursively possible.","PeriodicalId":54188,"journal":{"name":"Thesis Eleven","volume":"100 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thesis Eleven","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136231206181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Federated Australia was seen for a long time as a significant social ‘laboratory’. The Commonwealth itself was seen as an ‘experiment’. This widespread metaphor relied on a particular pattern of perception: the country was ‘new’ (it was not), and the country was allegedly isolated (it was not, at least not completely). Many believed that its social environment could be controlled, like that of a scientific laboratory. A laboratory is designed to shut all disturbances out – the value of the data and experiments depends on it. This article outlines this metaphor in the context of Australian history during the 20th century, its rhetorical power and what made it discursively possible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消极的联邦:澳大利亚过去和现在都是“实验室”
长期以来,澳大利亚联邦一直被视为一个重要的社会“实验室”。英联邦本身被视为一个“实验”。这个普遍的比喻依赖于一种特殊的感知模式:这个国家是“新”的(它不是),这个国家据称是孤立的(它不是,至少不是完全孤立的)。许多人认为它的社会环境是可以控制的,就像一个科学实验室一样。实验室的设计是为了排除一切干扰——数据和实验的价值就取决于此。本文在20世纪的澳大利亚历史背景下概述了这个隐喻,它的修辞力量以及它在话语上的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thesis Eleven
Thesis Eleven SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Established in 1996 Thesis Eleven is a truly international and interdisciplinary peer reviewed journal. Innovative and authorative the journal encourages the development of social theory in the broadest sense by consistently producing articles, reviews and debate with a central focus on theories of society, culture, and politics and the understanding of modernity. The purpose of this journal is to encourage the development of social theory in the broadest sense. We view social theory as both multidisciplinary and plural, reaching across social sciences and liberal arts and cultivating a diversity of critical theories of modernity across both the German and French senses of critical theory.
期刊最新文献
Jeffrey Alexander, a statesman in social theory and cultural sociology: An interview with Frédéric Vandenberghe From systems to forms: Reconstructing Niklas Luhmann’s approach to relationships Cornelius Castoriadis and Jacques Ellul on the dilemmas of technical autonomy ‘The coldest of all cold monsters’: Friedrich Nietzsche as a constitutional theorist Book review: The Work of History: Writing for Stuart Macintyre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1