Discernment of complex lithologies utilizing different scattering and textural components of SAR and optical data through machine learning approaches in Jaisalmer, Rajasthan, India

IF 1.4 4区 地球科学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Applied Remote Sensing Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.1117/1.jrs.17.044507
Raja Biswas, Virendra Singh Rathore
{"title":"Discernment of complex lithologies utilizing different scattering and textural components of SAR and optical data through machine learning approaches in Jaisalmer, Rajasthan, India","authors":"Raja Biswas, Virendra Singh Rathore","doi":"10.1117/1.jrs.17.044507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate lithological mapping is a difficult task through standard image processing techniques. We utilize the application of different machine learning (ML) algorithms on dual polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (SAR), optical data, and surface elevation images to map various lithologies in parts of Jaisalmer district of Rajasthan, India. Different SAR-derived textural and decomposition parameters were also used to improve the discrimination of various lithology units. Further, to improve the classification accuracy, different ML-based feature importance models, such as XGboost, decision tree, and random forest were implemented to select the useful bands for the classification of lithology. A total of 14 different ML classifiers were applied, and the best classifier was chosen after comparing their accuracies (overall accuracy, kappa coefficient, F1 score, and ROC-AUC curve) to map the lithology. Out of all of the classifiers used in this study, light gradient boosting machine (lightgbm) performed better in discriminating lithology (OA = 0.80, kappa coefficient = 0.75, and F1 score 0.79). In addition, the AUC values (>0.9 in all lithology units) were obtained for the “lightgbm” model, which is indicative of accurate discrimination of different lithological classes.","PeriodicalId":54879,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Remote Sensing","volume":"37 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jrs.17.044507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate lithological mapping is a difficult task through standard image processing techniques. We utilize the application of different machine learning (ML) algorithms on dual polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (SAR), optical data, and surface elevation images to map various lithologies in parts of Jaisalmer district of Rajasthan, India. Different SAR-derived textural and decomposition parameters were also used to improve the discrimination of various lithology units. Further, to improve the classification accuracy, different ML-based feature importance models, such as XGboost, decision tree, and random forest were implemented to select the useful bands for the classification of lithology. A total of 14 different ML classifiers were applied, and the best classifier was chosen after comparing their accuracies (overall accuracy, kappa coefficient, F1 score, and ROC-AUC curve) to map the lithology. Out of all of the classifiers used in this study, light gradient boosting machine (lightgbm) performed better in discriminating lithology (OA = 0.80, kappa coefficient = 0.75, and F1 score 0.79). In addition, the AUC values (>0.9 in all lithology units) were obtained for the “lightgbm” model, which is indicative of accurate discrimination of different lithological classes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在印度拉贾斯坦邦的Jaisalmer,通过机器学习方法利用SAR和光学数据的不同散射和纹理成分识别复杂岩性
通过标准的图像处理技术进行精确的岩性测绘是一项艰巨的任务。我们利用不同的机器学习(ML)算法在双偏振合成孔径雷达(SAR)、光学数据和地表高程图像上的应用,绘制了印度拉贾斯坦邦Jaisalmer地区部分地区的各种岩性。利用不同的sar导出的结构和分解参数来提高不同岩性单元的识别能力。为了提高分类精度,采用XGboost、决策树和随机森林等不同的基于ml的特征重要性模型来选择岩性分类的有用波段。总共使用了14种不同的ML分类器,通过比较它们的精度(总体精度、kappa系数、F1分数和ROC-AUC曲线)来选择最佳分类器来绘制岩性。在本研究使用的所有分类器中,光梯度增强机(lightgbm)在区分岩性方面表现较好(OA = 0.80, kappa系数= 0.75,F1评分0.79)。此外,“lightgbm”模型的AUC值在所有岩性单元中均>0.9,表明该模型能够准确区分不同岩性类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Remote Sensing
Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 环境科学-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Remote Sensing is a peer-reviewed journal that optimizes the communication of concepts, information, and progress among the remote sensing community.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring soil moisture in cotton fields with synthetic aperture radar and optical data in arid and semi-arid regions Cascaded CNN and global–local attention transformer network-based semantic segmentation for high-resolution remote sensing image Coastal chlorophyll-a concentration estimation by fusion of Sentinel-2 multispectral instrument and in-situ hyperspectral data Spectral index for estimating leaf water content across diverse plant species using multiple viewing angles Optimal band selection using explainable artificial intelligence for machine learning-based hyperspectral image classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1