{"title":"Voting and protest tendencies associated with changes in service delivery","authors":"Tina Fransman","doi":"10.1080/0376835x.2023.2252456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTExisting literature highlights the complexities of the relationship between voting, protest action and service delivery within Southern African democracies. We explore the relationship between these variables for South Africa by generating a new dataset from various sources. Although this relationship has been explored before, the existing evidence is mixed. The results from this study therefore bring a fresh perspective, especially at a time during which the political power of the incumbent African National Congress has been declining. We find that improvements in service delivery are not significantly associated with an increase in votes for the incumbent party, indicating that accountability is not the main motivation for South Africans’ voting decisions. However, we find a statistically significant negative correlation between protest action and service delivery, providing evidence of the increasing importance of protest action as a form of political accountability in South Africa.KEYWORDS: Accountabilityelectionspolitical participationprotest actionpublic service deliveryJEL CODES: D72H11H41H50 AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to thank Derek Yu, Servaas van der Berg, and participants at the Research on Socio-Economic Policy (ReSEP) seminar series for valuable inputs. Fransman acknowledges funding support from the National Research Foundation (NRF) and Research on Socio-Economic Policy (ReSEP).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In South Africa, more than 14 protests occurred daily, on average, over the period 1997 to 2013. (Bekker, Citation2022:232). There is also evidence to suggest that this number increased since 2013 (see: Runciman et al., Citation2016; Powell et al., Citation2015)2 The inert and predictable nature of voting outcomes, accompanied by electoral imbalances in the party system have raised concerns that elections fail to act as an accountability mechanism, which evokes deeper concern about the quality of democracy (Schulz-Herzenberg, Citation2009:2).3 The ANC has not always been the dominant party incumbent in all municipalities for local elections.4 Poisson regressions provide a standard framework in the analysis of count data. In reality however, it is often found that count data has a higher incidence of zero counts than is expected for the Poisson distribution.","PeriodicalId":51523,"journal":{"name":"Development Southern Africa","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835x.2023.2252456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACTExisting literature highlights the complexities of the relationship between voting, protest action and service delivery within Southern African democracies. We explore the relationship between these variables for South Africa by generating a new dataset from various sources. Although this relationship has been explored before, the existing evidence is mixed. The results from this study therefore bring a fresh perspective, especially at a time during which the political power of the incumbent African National Congress has been declining. We find that improvements in service delivery are not significantly associated with an increase in votes for the incumbent party, indicating that accountability is not the main motivation for South Africans’ voting decisions. However, we find a statistically significant negative correlation between protest action and service delivery, providing evidence of the increasing importance of protest action as a form of political accountability in South Africa.KEYWORDS: Accountabilityelectionspolitical participationprotest actionpublic service deliveryJEL CODES: D72H11H41H50 AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to thank Derek Yu, Servaas van der Berg, and participants at the Research on Socio-Economic Policy (ReSEP) seminar series for valuable inputs. Fransman acknowledges funding support from the National Research Foundation (NRF) and Research on Socio-Economic Policy (ReSEP).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In South Africa, more than 14 protests occurred daily, on average, over the period 1997 to 2013. (Bekker, Citation2022:232). There is also evidence to suggest that this number increased since 2013 (see: Runciman et al., Citation2016; Powell et al., Citation2015)2 The inert and predictable nature of voting outcomes, accompanied by electoral imbalances in the party system have raised concerns that elections fail to act as an accountability mechanism, which evokes deeper concern about the quality of democracy (Schulz-Herzenberg, Citation2009:2).3 The ANC has not always been the dominant party incumbent in all municipalities for local elections.4 Poisson regressions provide a standard framework in the analysis of count data. In reality however, it is often found that count data has a higher incidence of zero counts than is expected for the Poisson distribution.
现有文献强调了南部非洲民主国家投票、抗议行动和服务提供之间关系的复杂性。我们通过从各种来源生成新的数据集来探索南非这些变量之间的关系。虽然这种关系之前已经被探讨过,但现有的证据是混杂的。因此,这项研究的结果带来了一个新的视角,特别是在现任非洲人国民大会的政治权力一直在下降的时候。我们发现,服务提供的改善与现任政党的选票增加没有显著关联,这表明问责并不是南非人投票决定的主要动机。然而,我们发现抗议行动与服务提供之间存在统计学上显著的负相关,这证明抗议行动作为南非政治问责的一种形式越来越重要。关键词:问责制、选举、政治参与、抗议行动、公共服务提供感谢作者谨感谢Derek Yu、Servaas van der Berg和社会经济政策研究(ressep)系列研讨会的参与者提供的宝贵意见。弗兰斯曼感谢国家研究基金会(NRF)和社会经济政策研究(ReSEP)的资金支持。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1 1997年至2013年期间,南非平均每天发生14起以上的抗议活动。(Bekker Citation2022:232)。也有证据表明,自2013年以来,这一数字有所增加(见:Runciman等人,Citation2016;投票结果的惰性和可预测性,以及政党制度中的选举不平衡,引发了人们对选举不能作为问责机制的担忧,这引发了对民主质量的更深层次的担忧(Schulz-Herzenberg, Citation2009:2)在所有的地方选举中,非国大并不总是占主导地位的执政党泊松回归为计数数据的分析提供了一个标准框架。然而,在现实中,经常发现计数数据的零计数发生率高于泊松分布的预期。
期刊介绍:
The Development Southern Africa editorial team are pleased to announce that the journal has been accepted into the Thomson Reuters (formerly ISI) Social Science Citation Index. The journal will receive its first Impact Factor in 2010. Development Southern Africa offers a platform for expressing views and encouraging debate among development specialists, policy decision makers, scholars and students in the wider professional fraternity and especially in southern Africa. The journal publishes articles that reflect innovative thinking on key development challenges and policy issues facing South Africa and other countries in the southern African region.