A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAPITALISM: MAX WEBER AND MILTON FRIEDMAN

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1781
Ertugrul Gokcekuyu
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAPITALISM: MAX WEBER AND MILTON FRIEDMAN","authors":"Ertugrul Gokcekuyu","doi":"10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose- The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism,\" and Milton Friedman's influential book, \"Capitalism and Freedom,\" offer valuable insights into the intricate relationship between religion, capitalism, and the development of Western societies. Weber's analysis focuses on the historical and cultural factors that have shaped the evolution of capitalism, particularly examining the influence of religious beliefs, such as Protestantism. He argues that the Protestant work ethic, emphasizing hard work, thrift, and the pursuit of wealth, played a significant role in fostering capitalism. On the other hand, Friedman, an economist and advocate of classical liberal economics, explores the advantages of free-market capitalism and emphasizes limited government intervention in the economy. While acknowledging the historical impact of religion, Friedman primarily addresses the economic principles of capitalism and its relationship with political freedom. Weber's work draws upon historical research and sociological insights, while Friedman relies on economic theory and empirical analysis. Ultimately, Weber's analysis provides a deeper understanding of how Western societies adopted a capitalist work ethos, while Friedman's \"Capitalism and Freedom\" promotes a laissez-faire approach to economic policy, advocating for limited government intervention and the benefits of free markets. Methodology- Methodology employed in this study centers around conducting a discourse analysis of Max Weber's \"The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism\" and Milton Friedman's \"Capitalism and Freedom.\" The aim was to deconstruct the narratives presented in these influential books and analyze their respective perspectives on the relationship between religion, capitalism, and freedom. The primary methodological approach involved a close reading and critical examination of the texts, through which the ideas, arguments, and underlying assumptions put forth by Weber and Friedman were explored. By thoroughly engaging with the content of the books, a comprehensive understanding of the authors' viewpoints and the nuances of their arguments was sought. Additionally, comparative analysis techniques were employed to identify similarities and differences in the approaches taken by Weber and Friedman. Through this comparative approach, the distinctive aspects of their theories were highlighted, and the broader discourse surrounding religion, capitalism, and freedom in Western societies was illuminated.. Findings- According to Max Weber, the Protestant Reformation, with a specific focus on Calvinism, was instrumental in promoting values and behaviors that nurtured the capitalist spirit. The Protestant work ethic, emphasizing hard work, thrift, and the pursuit of wealth, created an environment conducive to the rise of capitalism. Milton Friedman primarily explores the economic principles of capitalism and their relationship with political freedom. It is argued by Friedman that economic freedom is a necessary condition for achieving civil and political freedom. Emphasis is placed on the detrimental effects of excessive government intervention, and advocacy is made for limited state control and free-market capitalism. Friedman believes that a competitive capitalist system, characterized by voluntary cooperation and individual initiative, can prevent the concentration of coercive political power. It is posited by him that economic arrangements, based on free markets and individual freedom, are crucial for the overall promotion of a free society. Conclusion- Both studies are unique in their own ways and contribute to original ideas on what capitalism ought to be. Weber compared to Friedman has a profound insight in how capitalism has grown from specific cultural and religious values. Friedman struggles with explaining how capitalism might have risen, but relies heavily on classic liberal ideas on how capitalism must be perceived to be a necessity for political freedoms. Keywords: Capitalism, protestant ethic, economic freedom, political freedom, hard work, discipline, free market JEL Codes: B1, B2, P4, Z1","PeriodicalId":15124,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose- The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism," and Milton Friedman's influential book, "Capitalism and Freedom," offer valuable insights into the intricate relationship between religion, capitalism, and the development of Western societies. Weber's analysis focuses on the historical and cultural factors that have shaped the evolution of capitalism, particularly examining the influence of religious beliefs, such as Protestantism. He argues that the Protestant work ethic, emphasizing hard work, thrift, and the pursuit of wealth, played a significant role in fostering capitalism. On the other hand, Friedman, an economist and advocate of classical liberal economics, explores the advantages of free-market capitalism and emphasizes limited government intervention in the economy. While acknowledging the historical impact of religion, Friedman primarily addresses the economic principles of capitalism and its relationship with political freedom. Weber's work draws upon historical research and sociological insights, while Friedman relies on economic theory and empirical analysis. Ultimately, Weber's analysis provides a deeper understanding of how Western societies adopted a capitalist work ethos, while Friedman's "Capitalism and Freedom" promotes a laissez-faire approach to economic policy, advocating for limited government intervention and the benefits of free markets. Methodology- Methodology employed in this study centers around conducting a discourse analysis of Max Weber's "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism" and Milton Friedman's "Capitalism and Freedom." The aim was to deconstruct the narratives presented in these influential books and analyze their respective perspectives on the relationship between religion, capitalism, and freedom. The primary methodological approach involved a close reading and critical examination of the texts, through which the ideas, arguments, and underlying assumptions put forth by Weber and Friedman were explored. By thoroughly engaging with the content of the books, a comprehensive understanding of the authors' viewpoints and the nuances of their arguments was sought. Additionally, comparative analysis techniques were employed to identify similarities and differences in the approaches taken by Weber and Friedman. Through this comparative approach, the distinctive aspects of their theories were highlighted, and the broader discourse surrounding religion, capitalism, and freedom in Western societies was illuminated.. Findings- According to Max Weber, the Protestant Reformation, with a specific focus on Calvinism, was instrumental in promoting values and behaviors that nurtured the capitalist spirit. The Protestant work ethic, emphasizing hard work, thrift, and the pursuit of wealth, created an environment conducive to the rise of capitalism. Milton Friedman primarily explores the economic principles of capitalism and their relationship with political freedom. It is argued by Friedman that economic freedom is a necessary condition for achieving civil and political freedom. Emphasis is placed on the detrimental effects of excessive government intervention, and advocacy is made for limited state control and free-market capitalism. Friedman believes that a competitive capitalist system, characterized by voluntary cooperation and individual initiative, can prevent the concentration of coercive political power. It is posited by him that economic arrangements, based on free markets and individual freedom, are crucial for the overall promotion of a free society. Conclusion- Both studies are unique in their own ways and contribute to original ideas on what capitalism ought to be. Weber compared to Friedman has a profound insight in how capitalism has grown from specific cultural and religious values. Friedman struggles with explaining how capitalism might have risen, but relies heavily on classic liberal ideas on how capitalism must be perceived to be a necessity for political freedoms. Keywords: Capitalism, protestant ethic, economic freedom, political freedom, hard work, discipline, free market JEL Codes: B1, B2, P4, Z1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资本主义的比较研究:马克斯·韦伯与米尔顿·弗里德曼
《目的——新教伦理与资本主义精神》和米尔顿·弗里德曼颇具影响力的著作《资本主义与自由》对宗教、资本主义和西方社会发展之间错综复杂的关系提供了有价值的见解。韦伯的分析侧重于影响资本主义演变的历史和文化因素,特别是考察宗教信仰的影响,如新教。他认为,新教的职业道德,强调努力工作、节俭和追求财富,在培育资本主义方面发挥了重要作用。另一方面,经济学家和古典自由主义经济学的倡导者弗里德曼探索了自由市场资本主义的优势,并强调政府对经济的有限干预。在承认宗教的历史影响的同时,弗里德曼主要论述了资本主义的经济原则及其与政治自由的关系。韦伯的著作借鉴了历史研究和社会学见解,而弗里德曼则依赖于经济理论和实证分析。最终,韦伯的分析提供了对西方社会如何采用资本主义工作精神的更深层次的理解,而弗里德曼的“资本主义与自由”提倡自由放任的经济政策,提倡有限的政府干预和自由市场的好处。方法论——本研究采用的方法论围绕着对马克斯·韦伯的《新教伦理与资本主义精神》和米尔顿·弗里德曼的《资本主义与自由》进行话语分析。目的是解构这些有影响力的书中所呈现的叙事,并分析它们各自对宗教、资本主义和自由之间关系的看法。主要的方法论方法包括对文本的仔细阅读和批判性检查,通过这些文本,我们探索了韦伯和弗里德曼提出的思想、论点和潜在假设。通过彻底参与书的内容,作者的观点和他们的论点的细微差别的全面理解是寻求。此外,比较分析技术被用来识别韦伯和弗里德曼所采取的方法的异同。通过这种比较方法,突出了他们理论的独特方面,并照亮了围绕西方社会的宗教,资本主义和自由的更广泛的话语。调查结果——根据马克斯·韦伯的说法,新教改革,特别是加尔文主义,在促进培育资本主义精神的价值观和行为方面发挥了重要作用。新教的职业道德,强调努力工作、节俭和追求财富,创造了有利于资本主义兴起的环境。米尔顿·弗里德曼主要探讨资本主义的经济原则及其与政治自由的关系。弗里德曼认为,经济自由是实现公民自由和政治自由的必要条件。重点是政府过度干预的有害影响,并倡导有限的国家控制和自由市场资本主义。弗里德曼认为,以自愿合作和个人主动性为特征的竞争性资本主义制度可以防止强制性政治权力的集中。他认为,以自由市场和个人自由为基础的经济安排对全面促进自由社会至关重要。结论-这两项研究都有自己独特的方式,并有助于对资本主义应该是什么原创性的想法。与弗里德曼相比,韦伯对资本主义是如何从特定的文化和宗教价值观中成长起来的有着深刻的见解。弗里德曼努力解释资本主义是如何崛起的,但在很大程度上依赖于经典的自由主义思想,即资本主义必须被视为政治自由的必要条件。关键词:资本主义,新教伦理,经济自由,政治自由,努力工作,纪律,自由市场
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The meaning and practice of inclusion AMIDST gender diversity on boards of public sector organizations in Uganda COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TALENT MANAGEMENT AT THE LEVEL OF ACADEMIC STUDIES THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF BRAND LIKEABILITY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRAND IMAGE AND CONSPICUOUS CONSUMPTION DETERMINATION OF NEW FLIGHT ROUTE WITH DEA METHOD IN AIRLINE OPERATIONS INVESTIGATION OF TURKIYE S PERSPECTIVE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BY COUNTRY WITH MULTIVARIABLE STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1